Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical outcomes and local recurrence following total or subtotal gastrectomy for early adenocarcinoma of antrum

  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Cancer Research

Abstract

Objective

The choice between total gastrectomy (TG) and subtotal gastrectomy (STG) for early adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the stomach is still a matter of debate and controversy amongst surgeons. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes, quality of life (QoL), and local recurrence rates as well as other results of curative resection of early distal adenocarcinoma of the stomach using TG or STG performed in Iran.

Methods

Hospital records of 66 patients with early distal adenocarcinoma of stomach that underwent even total or subtotal gastrectomy with perigastric (D2) lymphadenectomy between October 2001 and February 2006 in Taleghani Hospital, Iran were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic data as well as clinicopathological factors including number of involved lymph nodes, tumor grading, depth of invation, tumor size, and tumor type were recorded. Post-operative outcomes including mortality and morbidity, tumor recurrence and quality of life were assessed. Univariate analyses using Fisher’s exact test, the Student t-test, and the Pearson χ2 test were used.

Results

Local recurrence of tumor was found in 8 (23%) TG group patients and in 19 (61%) patients of STG group. the Pearson χ2 test showed a significant higher recurrence rate in STG (P value=0.002, Relative Risk=2.68, Confidence Interval: 1.37–5.24).The mean time interval between gastrectomy and tumor recurrence was not different between TG and STG. (19.75±5.1 vs. 18.0±7.8 respectively; P value=0.507) Tumor size >5 cm (P value=0.004), diffuse type (P value=0.034), poor differentiation (P value=0.000) and serosal invasion (P value=0.012) were found to be significantly related to tumor recurrence in patients undergone gastrectomy. In none of the QoL measures a significant difference was found between TG and STG.

Conclusion

Our results show that subtotal and total gastrectomy methods with perigastric lymphadenectomy have a similar postoperative complication rate and surgical outcomes as well as patient’s QoL but STG was associated to a more than twofold increase in local recurrence risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ministry of Health and Medical Education. Death in Four Provinces of Iran[M]. 2000.

  2. de Vries AC, Kuipers EJ. Epidemiology of premalignant gastric lesions: implications for the development of screening and surveillance strategies [J]. Helicobacter 2007; 12:22–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goh KL. Changing trends in gastrointestinal disease in the Asia-Pacific region [J]. J Dig Dis 2007; 8:179–185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsuzaka M, Fukuda S, Takahashi I, et al. The decreasing burden of gastric cancer in Japan [J]. Tohoku J Exp Med 2007; 212:207–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsugane S, Sasazuki S. Diet and the risk of gastric cancer: review of epidemiological evidence [J]. Gastric Cancer 2007; 10:75–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scurtu R, Groza N, Otel O, et al. Quality of life in patients with esophagojejunal anastamosis after total gastrectomy for cancer [J]. Rom J Gastroenterol 2005; 14:367–372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liedman B. Symptoms after total gastrectomy on food intake, body composition, bone metabolism, and quality of life in gastric cancer patients—is reconstruction with a reservoir worthwhile [J]? Nutrition 1999; 15:677–682.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuchs CS, Mayer RJ. Gastric carcinoma [J]. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:32–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. De Manzoni G, Verlato G, Roviello F, et al. Subtotal versus total gastrectomy for T3 adenocarcinoma of the antrum [J]. Gastric Cancer 2003; 6:237–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roukos D, Schmidt-Mathiesen A, Encke A. Adenocarcinoma of the gastric antrum: does D2 total gastrectomy with splenectomy improve prognosis compared to D1 subtotal gastrectomy? A long-term survival analysis with emphasis on Lauren classification [J]. Surg Oncol 1995; 4:323–332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cenitagoya GF, Bergh CK, Klinger-Roitman J. A prospective study of gastric cancer. ‘Real’ 5-year survival rates and mortality rates in a country with high incidence [J]. Dig Surg 1998; 15:317–322.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Robertson CS, Chung SC, Woods SD, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing R1 subtotal gastrectomy with R3 total gastrectomy for antral cancer [J]. Ann Surg 1994; 220:176–182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schlatter C. Uber Ernahrung und Verdauung nach vollstandiger Entfernung des Magens und Osophagojejunostomie beim Menschen, Brun’s Beitrage Klin Chir 1887; 19:757–776.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lau MK, Le AT, El-Serag HB. Noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma remains an important and deadly cancer in the United States: secular trends in incidence and survival J]. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101:2485–2492.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Le A, Berger D, Lau M, et al. Secular trends in the use, quality, and outcomes of gastrectomy for noncardia gastric cancer in the United States [J]. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14:2519–2527.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith JK, McPhee JT, Hill JS, et al. National outcomes after gastric resection for neoplasm [J]. Arch Surg 2007; 142:387–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Siewert JR, Böttcher K, Roder JD, et al. Prognostic relevance of systematic lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Carcinoma Study Group [J]. Br J Surg 1993; 80:1015–1018.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Roukos DH, Paraschou P, Lorenz M. Distal gastric cancer and extensive surgery: a new evaluation method based on the study of the status of residual lymph nodes after limited surgery [J]. Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7:719–726.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Piso P, Werner U, Lang H, et al. Proximal versus distal gastric carcinoma. What are the differences [J]? Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7:520–525.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hansson LE, Ekström AM, Bergström R, et al. Surgery for stomach cancer in a defined Swedish population: current practices and operative results. Swedish Gastric Cancer Study Group [J]. Eur J Surg 2000; 166:787–795.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McCulloch P, Ward J, Tekkis PP, ASCOT group of surgeons, British Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Group. Mortality and morbidity in gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery: initial results of ASCOT multicentre prospective cohort study [J]. BMJ 2003; 327:1192–1197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Adashek K, Sanger J, Longmire WP Jr. Cancer of the stomach: Review of consecutive ten year intervals [J]. Ann Surg 1979; 189:6–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. White RR, Mackie JA, Fitts WT Jr. An analysis of twenty years’ experience with operations for carcinoma of the stomach [J]. Ann Surg 1975; 181:611–615.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bittner R, Butters M, Ulrich M, et al. Total gastrectomy. Updated operative mortality and long-term survival with particular reference to patients older than 70 years of age [J]. Ann Surg 1996; 224:37–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu CW, Hsieh MC, Lo SS, et al. Morbidity and mortality after radical gastrectomy for patients with carcinoma of the stomach [J]. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 181:26–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bozzetti F, Marubini E, Bonfanti G, et al. Total versus subtotal gastrectomy: surgical morbidity and mortality rates in a multicenter Italian randomized trial. The Italian Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group [J]. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 613–620.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bozzetti F, Marubini E, Bonfanti G, et al. Subtotal versus total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: five-year survival rates in a multicenter randomized Italian trial. Italian Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group [J]. Ann Surg 1999; 230:170–178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Svedlund J, Sullivan M, Liedman B, et al. Quality of life after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma: controlled study of reconstructive procedures [J]. World J Surg 1997; 21:422–433.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Davies J, Johnston D, Sue-Ling H, et al. Total or subtotal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma? A study of quality of life [J]. World J Surg 1998; 22:1048–1055.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jentschura D, Winkler M, Strohmeier N, et al. Quality-of-life after curative surgery for gastric cancer: a comparison between total gastrectomy and subtotal gastric resection [J]. Hepatogastroenterology 1997; 44:1137–1142.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Braga M, Molinari M, Zuliani W, et al. Surgical treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma: impact on survival and quality of life. A prospective ten year study [J]. Hepatogastroenterology 1996; 43:187–193.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Korenaga D, Orita H, Okuyama T, et al. Quality of life after gastrectomy in patients with carcinoma of the stomach [J]. Br J Surg 1992; 79:248–250.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Larsson J, Akerlind I, Permerth J, et al. The relation between nutritional state and quality of life in surgical patients [J]. Eur J Surg 1994; 160:329–334.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehrdad Moghimi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moghimi, M., Marashi, S.A., Salehian, T. et al. Surgical outcomes and local recurrence following total or subtotal gastrectomy for early adenocarcinoma of antrum. Chin. J. Cancer Res. 20, 279–285 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11670-008-0279-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11670-008-0279-6

Keyword

CLC number

Navigation