Advertisement

Journal of Phase Equilibria and Diffusion

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 246–254 | Cite as

Microstructural Characterization of AA6061 Versus AA6061 HIP Bonded Cladding–Cladding Interface

  • Abhishek Mehta
  • Le Zhou
  • Esin A. Schulz
  • Dennis D. KeiserJr.
  • James I. Cole
  • Yongho Sohn
Article
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

Microstructural characterization using scanning electron microscopy and scanning transmission electron microscopy (TEM/STEM) was carried out near the interface between the two AA6061 alloys that were hot isostatically pressed (HIP) to clad Zr laminated U-10 wt.% Mo metallic nuclear fuel. The HIP-bonded AA6061–AA6061 interface consisted of discontinuous layer of Mg2Si along with traces of fine MgO dispersoids and small precipitates of Al19(Fe, Cr, Cu)4MnSi2. To examine the presence of statistical variation, quantitative microscopy was also conducted, using several HIP’ed samples, to measure the relative linear density of the Mg2Si precipitates at the HIP bonded AA6061–AA6061 interface. In order to better understand the formation of discontinuous Mg2Si layer, solid-to-solid diffusion couple experiments were carried out using temperature and time relevant to HIP. The discontinuous Mg2Si layer was not observed in diffusion couples that were rapidly water-quenched, but those slowly cooled in air and in furnace developed the discontinuous Mg2Si. Presence of oxygen, confirmed by electron energy loss spectroscopy via STEM, at the interface would be the potential driving force for the migration of Mg and Si atoms, where Mg would preferentially react with oxygen to form MgO, and excess Mg would react with Si to form Mg2Si during cooling. Faster cooling after HIP may minimize the formation of excessive Mg2Si.

Keywords

aluminum cladding electron microscopy hot isostatic pressing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Materials Threat Reduction (NA-212), National Nuclear Security Administration, under DOE-NE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517. Accordingly, the US Government retains a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or allow others to do so, for US Government purposes.

References

  1. 1.
    J.L. Snelgrove, G.L. Hofman, M.K. Meyer, C.L. Trybus, and T.C. Wiencek, Development of Very-High-Density Low-Enriched-Uranium Fuels, Nucl. Eng. Des., 1997, 178(1), p 119-126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.L. Snelgrove, G.L. Hofman, C.L. Trybus, and T.C. Wiencek, Development of Very-High-Density Fuels by the RERTR Program, 19th International Meeting on Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors (RERTR); Seoul (Korea, Republic of), (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.D. Keiser, S.L. Hayes, M.K. Meyer, and C.R. Clark, High-Density, Low-Enriched Uranium Fuel for Nuclear Research Reactors, JOM, 2003, 55(9), p 55-58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.A. Moore, F.J. Rice, N.E. Woolstenhulme, W.D. Swank, D.C. Haggard, J.-F. Jue, B.H. Park, S.E. Steffler, N.P. Hallinan, M.D. Chapple, and D.E. Burkes, Monolithic Fuel Fabrication Process Development at the Idaho National Laboratory, RERTR 2008-30th International Meeting on Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors, 2008Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. Park, N. Eriksson, D. Keiser, J. Jue, B. Rabin, G. Moore, and Y. Sohn, Microstructural Anomalies in Hot-Isostatic Pressed U–10 wt.% Mo Fuel Plates with Zr Diffusion Barrier, Mater. Charact., 2015, 103, p 50-57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Park, J. Yoo, K. Huang, D. Keiser, J. Jue, B. Rabin, G. Moore, and Y. Sohn, Growth Kinetics and Microstructural Evolution During Hot Isostatic Pressing of U-10 wt.% Mo Monolithic Fuel Plate in AA6061 Cladding with Zr Diffusion Barrier, J. Nucl. Mater., 2014, 447(1), p 215-224ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Huang, Y. Park, D. Keiser, Jr., and Y. Sohn, Interdiffusion Between Zr Diffusion Barrier and U-Mo Alloy, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 2012, 33(6), p 443-449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Dickson, L. Zhou, A.P.Y. Puente, M. Fu, D. Keiser, and Y. Sohn, Interdiffusion and Reaction Between Zr and Al Alloys from 425 to 625 °C, Intermetallics, 2014, 49, p 154-162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y. Park, N. Eriksson, R. Newell, D. Keiser, and Y. Sohn, Phase Decomposition of γ-U (BCC) in U-10 wt% Mo Fuel Alloy During Hot Isostatic Pressing of Monolithic Fuel Plate, J. Nucl. Mater., 2016, 480, p 271-280ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.-F. Jue, D.D. Keiser, C.R. Breckenridge, G.A. Moore, and M.K. Meyer, Microstructural Characteristics of HIP-Bonded Monolithic Nuclear Fuels with a Diffusion Barrier, J. Nucl. Mater., 2014, 448(1), p 250-258ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Crapps, K. Clarke, J. Katz, D.J. Alexander, B. Aikin, V.D. Vargas, J.D. Montalvo, D.E. Dombrowski, and B. Mihaila, Development of the Hot Isostatic Press Manufacturing Process For Monolithic Nuclear Fuel, Nucl. Eng. Des., 2013, 254, p 43-52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Moore, J. Jue, B. Rabin, and M. Nilles, Full Size U-10Mo Monolithic Fuel Foil and Fuel Plate Fabrication-Technology Development, Proceedings of the Research Reactor Fuel Management Conference, 2010Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Villars and L. Calvert, Pearson’s Handbook of Crystallographic Data for Intermetallic Phases, Second Edition, 1991, 1, p 825Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Chandler, Heat Treater’s Guide: Practices and Procedures for Nonferrous Alloys, ASM international, 1996, p 201–205Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R.D. Schmidt, E.D. Case, J. Giles, III, J.E. Ni, and T.P. Hogan, Room-Temperature Mechanical Properties and Slow Crack Growth Behavior of Mg2Si Thermoelectric Materials, J. Electron. Mater., 2012, 41(6), p 1210-1216ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.W. Armstrong, Dislocation Pile-Ups: From 110 Cracking in MgO to Model Strength Evaluations, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, 409(1), p 24-31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abhishek Mehta
    • 1
    • 2
  • Le Zhou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Esin A. Schulz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dennis D. KeiserJr.
    • 3
  • James I. Cole
    • 3
  • Yongho Sohn
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Advanced Materials Processing and Analysis CenterUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  3. 3.Idaho National LaboratoryIdaho FallsUSA

Personalised recommendations