Skip to main content
Log in

Failure Analysis and Optimization of High Mechanical Strength Surge Arresters Using Finite Element Analysis

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High mechanical strength surge arresters (HPCAs) are essential components for protecting electrical power systems from overvoltage surges. However, HPCAs can fail under cantilever loading conditions, which is a rare but serious event that can have significant consequences for the reliability of the power system. This paper presents a failure analysis and optimization of HPCAs based on finite element analysis (FEA). A three-dimensional FEA model was developed and used to evaluate the cantilever strength of the arrester under various design configurations. The existing design configuration with 12 insulating rods of 5.8 mm diameter was found to fail to meet the cantilever strength criteria. Therefore, the deflection values of various configurations of insulating rod diameter (5.8, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 mm) and number of rods (12, 18, and 14) were evaluated. The depth of the insulating rods inside the aluminum end fittings (EFs) was also varied. This work further employs a ramping method in analysis to reduce processing time and applies adhesion boundary conditions to simulate the behavior of the insulating rods and aluminum EFs. These approaches have allowed us to accurately model the behavior of the HPCA under cantilever loading conditions and investigate the failure mechanisms of the system. The FEA results showed that the cantilever strength of the HPCA could be significantly improved by increasing the diameter of the insulating rods and/or increasing the number of rods. The proposed approach is used to develop a new HPCA design with improved mechanical strength, which is validated through experimental testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. Hinrichsen, Metal-oxide surge arresters. Fundamentals, Siemens 1, (2001)

  2. P. Pinceti, M. Giannettoni, A simplified model for zinc oxide surge arresters. IEEE Trans. Power Delivery. 14(2), 393–398 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. IEEE Guide for Surge Voltage Arresters for Alternating-Current Power Circuits, IEEE standard C62.11-2020, (2020)

  4. ANSI/IEEE Standard for Surge Arresters for Alternating Current Power Circuits. in ANSI/IEEE Std 28-1974 (Revision of IEEE 28-1972), pp.1-28, 18 Dec. 1974, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.1974.7403780

  5. F. Fernandez, R. Diaz, Metal oxide surge arrester model for fast transient simulations, in Proceedings of 2001 International conference on power system transients, pp 681-687. (2001)

  6. V.S. Brito, G.R.S. Lira, E.G. Costa, M.J.A. Maia, A wide-range model for metal-oxide surge arrester. IEEE Trans. Power Delivery. 33(1), 102–109 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2017.2704108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P.M. Miguel, Comparison of surge arrester models. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 29(1), 21–28 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2013.2279835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Steinfeld, B. Kruska and W. Welsch, Manufacturing and Application of Cage Design High Voltage Metal Oxide Surge Arresters, in XIIIth International Symposium on high Volt-age Engineering, Netherlands, Vol 25, (2003)

  9. E.P. Dick, B.K. Gupta, J.W. Porter, A. Greenwood, Practical design of generator surge protection. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 6(2), 736–743 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1109/61.131134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. W. Durbak, Surge arrester modeling, in 2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194), Columbus, OH, USA, 2001, pp. 728-730 vol 2, (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/PESW.2001.916946

  11. K. Steinfeld, Design of metal-oxide surge arresters with polymeric housings, in World Conference & Exhibition on Insulators, Arresters and Bushings, pp 16-19, (2003)

  12. L. Klingbeil, U. Bauch, Surge arresters in composite housings-new developments and long-term experiences, in 2008 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition, pp. 1-7, (2008)

  13. W. A. Chisholm, Mechanical and environmental considerations in transmission line surge arrester applications, in 2013 International Symposium on Lightning Protection (XII SIPDA), pp. 384-393, (2013)

  14. PGCIL Technical Specification, Section: Switchgear – SA, C/ENGG/SPEC/SWGR/SA/R12, (2020)

  15. K.M.M. Muneer et al., Structural analysis of 420 kV polymer-housed surge arrester. Int. J. Power Energy Syst. (2022). https://doi.org/10.2316/J.2022.203-0385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S.M. Seyyedbarzegar, M. Mirzaie, Application of finite element method for electro-thermal modeling of metal oxide surge arrester. Comput. Appl. Eng. 23(6), 910–920 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. G. Costa, R.M. Barros, H. M. Alves, M. A. Bastos, Thermal behavior analysis of ZnO polymeric surge arrester using the finite elements method. in 2014 ICHVE International Conference on High Voltage Engineering and Application, pp 1-4, IEEE, (2014)

  18. D. Zhang, F. Kasolis, Topology optimization for a station class surge arrester model. Int. J. Numer. Model. Electron. Netw. Dev. Fields. 36(3), e3041 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. N. Alti, Contribution to the study and analysis of the metal oxide surge arresters failure. PhD diss., (2022)

  20. COMSOL Multiphyics (2016) How to Model Adhesion and Decohesion in COMSOL Multiphysics by Henrik Sönnerlind

  21. COMSOL (n.d.) COMSOL Knowledgebase/1102-Structural Contact Modelling Guidelines. Retrieved from COMSOL.COM: https://www.comsol.com/support/knowledgebase/110

  22. H.A. Mesbah, R. Benzaid, B. Benmokrane, Evaluation of bond strength of FRP reinforcing rods in concrete and FE modelling. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Constr. Sci. 4(3), 21–41 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Masmoudi, H. Mohamed, S. Metiche, Finite element modeling for deflection and bending responses of GFRP poles. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 27(6), 639–658 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. M.M. Prabhakar et al., An overview of burst, buckling, durability and corrosion analysis of lightweight FRP composite pipes and their applicability. Compos. Struct. 230, 111419 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. N. A. A. Latiff, Optimization of zinc oxide surge arrester design in reducing leakage current. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Malaya (Malaysia), (2018)

  26. M. Keuser, B. Kepp, G. Mehlhorn, F. Rostasy, Nonlinear static analysis of end-fittings for GFRP-prestressing rods. Comput. Struct. 17(5–6), 719–730 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Madhoushi, M.P. Ansell, Effect of glue-line thickness on pull-out behavior of glued-in GFRP rods in LVL: Finite element analysis. Polym. Testing. 62, 196–202 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that they have received no funding from anyone for this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ishant Jain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhoye, G., Jain, I. Failure Analysis and Optimization of High Mechanical Strength Surge Arresters Using Finite Element Analysis. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-024-01916-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-024-01916-8

Keywords

Navigation