Skip to main content

An Alternative Failure Distribution for Reliability Evaluation of Diverse Technological Systems


A new failure distribution for reliability evaluation of modern technological systems is proposed in this article. Methods for estimation the parameters of this distribution were presented based on failure statistics and the dependence of reliability indexes was investigated over time. The proposed failure distribution can be applied to describe the different failure behavior of modern machines and man-machine systems. On the example of practical cases, the hypothesis of compliance of the proposed theoretical law of distributions to the actual statistical data on failures of various technological systems was tested by the criterion χ2 - K. Pearson.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5 
Fig. 6 
Fig. 7 
Fig. 8 


  1. 1.

    K.C. Kapur, Lamberson L R Reliability in Engineering Design. (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bebbington, M., Lai, CD. & Zitikis, R. Life expectancy of a bathtub shaped failure distribution. Stat Papers 51599–612 (2010).

  3. 3.

    B. Bertsche, Reliability in Automotive and Mechanical Engineering: Determination of Component and System Reliability. (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    M.D. Russell, T.A. Jur, Engineering Analysis of Failure: A Determination of Cause Method. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 17, 8–14 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    A. Kaufmann, D. Grouchko, Cruon R Mathematical models for the study of the reliability of systems. (Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, London, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Weibull, W.: A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics 1951; pp. 293-297.

  7. 7.

    Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) Handbook, 2007; 105 p. Moubray J. Reliability-centered maintenance. 2. ed. New York: Industrial Press; 1997.

  8. 8.

    A. Meyna, B. Pauli, Zuverlässigkeitstechnik: Quantitative Bewertungsverfahren. (Carl Hanser Verlag, München Wien, 2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    D.B. Kececioglu, Reliability Engineering Handbook. (DEStech Publications Inc., Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    G. Härtler, Statistik für Ausfalldaten: Modelle und Methoden für Zuverlässigkeits- untersuchungen. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Girphanov A. Electromagnetic compatibility of submersible electrical equipment of oil production enterprises and development of a set of measures to improve the reliability of its work (Dissertation). Samara, Russia, 2005. (

  12. 12.

    I.N. Bronshtein, K.A. Semendyayev, G. Musiol, H. Muehlig, Handbook of Mathematics. (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Babayev S., Habibov I. and Melikov R. Fundamentals of the reliability theory of oilfield equipment. Publishing company AGNA, Baku, Azerbaijan; 2015., (In Russian).

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iftikhar Chalabi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chalabi, I. An Alternative Failure Distribution for Reliability Evaluation of Diverse Technological Systems. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 21, 1866–1874 (2021).

Download citation


  • Reliability
  • Failure distribution
  • Failure rate
  • Failure density function
  • Survival probability