Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability Assessment and Improvement for Aircraft Lock Mechanism with Multiple Failure Modes

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an aircraft, the lock mechanism is one of the important components of the landing gear door lock system, whose working performance affects the aircraft flight performance directly. This research focuses on reliability assessment and reliability improvement of the locking process of an aircraft lock mechanism. First, according to the motion principle of the aircraft lock mechanism, a simulation model of the locking process is built by LMS Virtual.Lab simulation platform. Then, two performance functions of the two critical failure modes of the locking process about maximum locking resistance and required time are established, respectively. Subsequently, Kriging model and importance sampling method are combined to evaluate the reliability of the locking process. Finally, the reliability sensitivity is analyzed to identify critical variables which influence the reliability. Three cases are analyzed by adjusting the parameters of the two most critical variables, and the results show that the system reliability and the reliability of each failure mode are improved during the locking process of the aircraft lock mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Wang, B.F. Song, T.X. Yu, Investigation on experimental motion reliability based on simulation system for mechanism the multibody simulation model. J. Astronaut. 32(5), 1005–1011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Z.C. Sun, T.X. Yu, W.M. Cui, B.F. Song, A simulative reliability trial method for mechanism based on multi-factors coupling. J. Astronaut. 34(11), 1516–1522 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Pang, T.X. Yu, B.F. Song, Failure mechanism analysis and reliability assessment of an aircraft slat. Eng. Fail. Anal. 60, 261–279 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Guo, W.M. Cui, Y. Shi, J.Y. Liu, B.F. Song, Function failure and failure boundary analysis for an aircraft lock mechanism. Eng. Fail. Anal. 70, 428–442 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Sun, G. Chen, Kinematic accuracy analysis of planar mechanisms with clearance involving random and epistemic uncertainty. Eur. J. Mech. A. Solids 58, 256–261 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S.X. Wang, Y.H. Wang, B.Y. He, Dynamic modeling of flexible multibody systems with parameter uncertainty. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 36, 605–611 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T.W. Liao, Z.H. Zhan, C.R. Mount, An integrated database and expert system for failure mechanism identification: part I automated knowledge acquisition. Eng. Fail. Anal. 6, 387–406 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. X.S. Yu, T.X. Yu, L.K. Song, B.F. Song, Failure criterion analysis and reliability assessment in process of cartridge ejection. Eng. Fail. Anal. 96, 130–141 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L.J. Shen, Y.G. Zhang, K.L. Song, Failure analysis of a lock mechanism with multiple dependent components based on two phase degradation model. Eng. Fail. Anal. 104, 1076–1093 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. X.C. Zhuang, T.X. Yu, Time-varying dependence research on wear of revolute joints and a lock mechanism. Eng. Fail. Anal. 96, 543–561 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. X.Y. Li, W.B. Chen, R. Kang, Performance margin-based reliability analysis for aircraft lock mechanism considering multi-source uncertainties and wear. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 205, 107234 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M.D. Angelis, E. Patelli, M. Beer, Advanced line sampling for efficient robust reliability analysis. Struct. Saf. 52, 170–182 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S.F. Song, Z.Z. Lu, H.W. Qiao, Subset simulation for structural reliability sensitivity analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94, 658–665 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D.L. Allaix, V.I. Carbone, An improvement of the response surface method. Struct. Saf. 33, 165–172 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. E.H. Jorge, A.A. Diego, Neural-network-based reliability analysis: a comparative study. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 191, 113–132 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J.P.C. Kleijnen, Kriging metamodeling in simulation: a review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 192(3), 707–716 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Neal, Radford, Slice Sampling. Ann. Stat. 31(3), 705–767 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Lloyd, Stuart, least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 28, 129–137 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. G.J. Hahn, S.S. Shapiro, Statistical Models in Engineering (Wiley, Hoboken, 1994), p. 88

    Google Scholar 

  20. Z.Z. Lu, C.L. Liu, L. Fu, An adaptive importance sampling algorithm and its application for multiple failure modes. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 38(5), 705–711 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52075443), Foundation of Equipment Advance Research Program of China (No. 61400040503), and Basic Research Program of Natural Science of Shaanxi Province of China (No. 2020JM-113).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yugang Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, K., Zhang, Y. & Shen, L. Reliability Assessment and Improvement for Aircraft Lock Mechanism with Multiple Failure Modes. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 21, 640–648 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-01091-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-01091-6

Keywords

Navigation