Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple-Output Fracture Characteristics Optimization of Bi-material Interfaces for Composite Pipe Repair Using Swarm Intelligence Technique

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript


For gas and oil pipelines undergoing corroding metal damage, a standard alternative method for reinforcing them is by using bi-material composite repair. Internal pressure at interface of the repair forms a blister and the stresses induced due to pressure. Various practical models are studied for evaluating and designing such repairs against breakdown. This study examined various optimum levels of factors affecting fracture mechanics characteristics (FMC) of failure through crack propagation at the interface using particle swarm optimization (PSO). The significant factors from crack length, composite repair material, testing models and FMC’s regression models found out using ANOVA to predict outputs without experimentations. Response surface technique discussed the effect of square and interaction levels of factors on outputs. Multiple-outputs synchronization together provided multiple set of optimum factor levels were obtained using PSO technique integrated with a genetic algorithm. It prolongs convergence to obtain multiple solutions, and PSO also used an optimal Pareto front to convert into a non-dominated useful set of solutions. Thus, Multi-output PSO analysis improved the accuracy of composite repair characteristics by having minimum thickness of composite repair while withstanding maximum pressure. Vast data on the combination of the optimal solution have been generated for every possible combination of factors. This generated data may be used as a reference manual for researchers in the field of composite repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The data analyzed for this manuscript is the part of our research work and is available for public used.


  1. J. Frittelli, A. Andrews, P.W. Parfomak, R. Pirog, J.L. Ramseur, M. Ratner, U.S. Rail Transportation of Crude Oil: Background and Issues for Congress Specialist in Transportation Policy Specialist in Energy Policy Specialist in Energy and Infrastructure Policy Specialist in Energy Economics Specialist in Environmental Policy. Congr Res Serv (2014)

  2. ASME PCC-2. Repair of Pressure Equipment and Piping (2018)

  3. G.H. Koch, M.P. Brongers, N.G. Tompson, Y.P. Virmani, J.H. Payer. Corrosion Costs and Preventive Strategies in the United States. Fed Highw Adm Off Infrastruct Res Dev (2001), pp. 260–311

  4. C.J. Kuhlman, U.S. Lindholm, D.R. Stephens, T.J. Kilinski, R.B. Francini. Long-term reliability of gas pipeline repairs by reinforced composites. Final report, July 1991–May 1995. United States (1995)

  5. J.M. Duell, J.M. Wilson, M.R. Kessler, Analysis of a carbon composite overwrap pipeline repair system. Int. J. Press. Vessel Pip. 85, 782–788 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Alexander, F. Worth, Using industry standards for designing composite repair systems for corroded process piping. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Press. Vessel Pip. Div. PVP 1, 175–184 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T.S. Mally, A.L. Johnston, M. Chann, R.H. Walker, M.W. Keller, Performance of a carbon-fiber/epoxy composite for the underwater repair of pressure equipment. Compos. Struct. 100, 542–547 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. I.A. Alnaser, Y. Alsaadi, M.W. Keller, Comparison of the crack-growth rates for full-encirclement and patch composite repairs. Compos. Struct. (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barros S. De, B.M. Fadhil, F. Alila, J. Diop, J.M.L. Reis, P. Casari et al., Using blister test to predict the failure pressure in bonded composite repaired pipes. Compos. Struct. 211, 125–133 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H.W. Andresen, A.T. Echtermeyer, Critical energy release rate for a CSM reinforced carbon fibre composite/steel bonding. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 37, 742–751 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. I.A. Alnaser, M.W. Keller, Comparison of coupon and full-scale determination of energy release rate for bonded composite repairs of pressure equipment. Eng. Fract. Mech. 146, 31–40 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Yunus, M.S. Alsoufi, Mathematical modeling of multiple quality characteristics of a laser microdrilling process used in Al7075/SiCp metal matrix composite using genetic programming. Model. Simul. Eng. 2019, 1–15 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Yunus, M.S. Alsoufi, Application of response surface methodology for the optimization of the control factors of abrasive flow machining of multiple holes in zinc and Al/SiCp MMC wires. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 15, 655–674 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. C.P. Mohanty, S.S. Mahapatra, M.R. Singh, A particle swarm approach for multi-objective optimization of electrical discharge machining process. J. Intell. Manuf. 27, 1171–1190 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Garg, A hybrid PSO-GA algorithm for constrained optimization problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 274, 292–305 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. P.A. Zugliani, M.D. Banea, S. Budhe, R.J. Carbas, L.F.M. da Silva, N.R.F. Rohem et al., Bonded composite repair of metallic pipeline using energy release rate method. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 33, 2141–2156 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. J.M. Wilson. Characterization of a carbon fiber reinforced polymer repair system for structurally deficient steel piping. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Tulsa (2006)

  18. H. Jin, G.M. Miller, N.R. Sottos, S.R. White, Fracture and fatigue response of a self-healing epoxy adhesive. Polymer (Guildf) 52, 1628–1634 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. W.K. Goertzen, M.R. Kessler, Dynamic mechanical analysis of carbon/epoxy composites for structural pipeline repair. Compos. Part B Eng. 38, 1–9 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. I.A. Alnaser. Comparison of quasi-static and fatigue performance of composite repairs using coupon and full-scale samples. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Tulsa (2017)

  21. M. Yunus, M.S. Alsoufi, Multi-objective optimizations of mechanical characteristics of objects in computer aided SIS manufacturing process using empirical PSO algorithm. Rom. J. Inf. Technol. Autom. Control 30, 23–36 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. M.M. Oreijah, M. Yunus, A parametric analysis to evaluate the performance metrics of power generation system involving Trilateral Flash Cycle using three different working fluids for low grade waste heat. AIMS Energy (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors received no financial support for the research and/or for the publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Yunus.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alnaser, I.A., Yunus, M., Alfattani, R. et al. Multiple-Output Fracture Characteristics Optimization of Bi-material Interfaces for Composite Pipe Repair Using Swarm Intelligence Technique. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 21, 507–517 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: