Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effective Parameters on Chemical Accidents Occurrence: Findings from a Systematic Review

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chemical accidents have had an increasing trend both in developed and developing countries in the two recent decades. Inappropriate infrastructures make developing countries more vulnerable to chemical accidents. Assessing chemical risks and defining the relevant causes as well as variables are necessary for reducing the injuries and causalities of such chemical incidents. The aim of this study was to explore the causes and parameters affecting occurrence of chemical accidents. The study was performed in 2018. The systematic review adopted in this paper was based on a step-wise process including framing questions, identifying relevant works, assessing the quality of studies, summarizing the evidence and lastly discussing methods, results, and findings. It used bibliographies, citation databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, and other available records to find an answer to the question of what the effective parameters are on the chemical accident occurrence. Descriptive and thematic analyses were performed to find the articles. The written manuscript was evaluated by PRISMA checklist. It examined 24 peer-reviewed English papers, four reports, and one guideline. It found 39 variables mostly contributing to the occurrence of chemical accidents during this systematic review study. These variables were classified into three main causes and four categories. The main causes included direct/immediate factors, indirect/external/environmental factors, and root parameters. Prevention and mitigation chemical action plans are required to establish chemical safety and preparedness against chemical incidents. Further studies are needed to make the causes, categories and variables more valid, specific, and detailed based on the characteristics of production, storage, transportation, and chemical disposal activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Appendix 5—Environmental consequences of chemical accidents report of OECD special session (extracts), in Major Accidents to the Environment, ed. I. Vince (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2008), pp. 183–190

  2. M.H. Wood, L. Fabbri, Challenges and opportunities for assessing global progress in reducing chemical accident risks. Prog. Disaster Sci. 4, 100044 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C.T. Kiranoudis, S.P. Kourniotis, M. Christolis, N.C. Markatos, K.G. Zografos, I.M. Giannouli et al., An operational centre for managing major chemical industrial accidents. J. Hazard. Mater. 89(2), 141–161 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Hou, Environmental accident and its treatment in a developing country: a case study on China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 184(8), 4855–4859 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S.J. Kang, Trends in major industrial accidents in Korea. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 12, 75–77 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D.D. Derezinski, M.G. Lacy, P.B. Stretesky, Chemical accidents in the United States, 1990–1996*. Soc. Sci. Q. 84(1), 122–143 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R.M. Darbra, A. Palacios, J. Casal, Domino effect in chemical accidents: main features and accident sequences. J. Hazard. Mater. 183(1–3), 565–573 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Kukkonen, A.L. Savolainen, I. Valkama, S. Juntto, T. Vesala, Long-range transport of ammonia released in a major chemical accident at Ionava, Lithuania. J. Hazard. Mater. 35(1), 1–16 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Marshall, The predictions of human mortality from chemical accidents with especial reference to the lethal toxicity of chlorine. J. Hazard. Mater. 22(1), 13–56 (1989)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. P.R. Kleindorfer, J.C. Belke, M.R. Elliott, K. Lee, R.A. Lowe, H.I. Feldman, Accident epidemiology and the U.S. chemical industry: accident history and worst-case data from RMP*Info. Risk Anal. 23(5), 865–881 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Sarangi, T. Zaidi, R.K. Pal, D. Katgara, V.G. Gadag, S. Mulay et al., Effects of exposure of parents to toxic gases in Bhopal on the offspring. Am. J. Ind. Med. 53(8), 836–841 (2010)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Broughton, The Bhopal disaster and its aftermath: a review. Environ. Health Glob. Access Sci. Source 4(1), 6 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Zanjani, Z. Rafie Majd, A. Mirzazadeh, Calculation of the fuzzy reliability in Neishabour train disaster; a case study. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. Stud. 2(1), 1–15 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.R. Elliott, Y. Wang, R.A. Lowe, P.R. Kleindorfer, Environmental justice: frequency and severity of US chemical industry accidents and the socioeconomic status of surrounding communities. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58(1), 24–30 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. K.P. Prem, D. Ng, M.S. Mannan, Harnessing database resources for understanding the profile of chemical process industry incidents. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 23(4), 549–560 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. H.D. Zhang, X.P. Zheng, Characteristics of hazardous chemical accidents in China: a statistical investigation. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25(4), 686–693 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Kidam, M. Hurme, Analysis of equipment failures as contributors to chemical process accidents. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 91(1–2), 61–78 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Sales, F. Mushtaq, M.D. Christou, R. Nomen, Study of major accidents involving chemical reactive substances analysis and lessons learned. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 85(2B), 117–124 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. OECD, Guiding Principles for Chemical Accident Prevention, Preparedness and Response, 2nd edn. (OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications, Paris, 2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. R.R. Fullwood, Chapter 9—Chemical Process Accident Consequence Analysis (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Meel, L.M. O’Neill, J.H. Levin, W.D. Seider, U. Oktem, N. Keren, Operational risk assessment of chemical industries by exploiting accident databases. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 20(2), 113–127 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D. Huizer, A.M.J. Ragas, R. Oldenkamp, J.G.M. van Rooij, M.A.J. Huijbregts, Uncertainty and variability in the exposure reconstruction of chemical incidents—the case of acrylonitrile. Toxicol. Lett. 231(3), 337–343 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. W. Jiang, W. Han, Analysis of “2·28” keeper chemical industries hazardous chemical explosion accident based on FTA and HFACS. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15, 2151 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hazardous Substances Emergency Events Surveillance, Nine States, 1999–2008. Contract No.: 2 (2015)

  25. Y. Li, H. Ping, Z.H. Ma, L.G. Pan, Statistical analysis of sudden chemical leakage accidents reported in China between 2006 and 2011. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 21(8), 5547–5553 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. H. Dong, Y. Liu, D. Zhao, J. Chen, Y. Wang, W. Wang (eds.), Lessons learned from analyzing an explosion accident at Shanghai Secco chemical plant (2019)

  27. Y. Gong, Y. Fan, Applying HFACS approach to accident analysis in petro-chemical industry in China: case study of explosion at Bi-benzene plant in Jilin (2016), pp. 399–406

  28. K.H. Harrington, S.E. Rose (eds.), Summary of the Sierra chemical explosives manufacturing incident investigation (2000)

  29. H.Q. Feng, H.A. Gabbar, K. Suzuki, D. Rizal, Use of grey relation analysis in causative analysis of chemical plant accidents. Int. J. Perform. Eng. 2(4), 341–350 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. S.H. Baek, H.M. Kwon, H.S. Byun, A study on process safety incident precursors to prevent major process safety incidents in the Yeosu chemical complex. Korean Chem. Eng. Res. 56(2), 212–221 (2018)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. S. Hanna, J. Chang, Dependence of maximum concentration from chemical accidents on release duration. Atmos. Environ. 148, 1–7 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. W. Duan, G. Chen, Q. Ye, Q. Chen, The situation of hazardous chemical accidents in China between 2000 and 2006. J. Hazard. Mater. 186(2–3), 1489–1494 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. X. Zhang, X. Li, Analysis of hazardous chemicals transportation accidents and transportation management. Chem. Eng. Trans. 67, 745–750 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. M.F. Orr, J. Wu, S.L. Sloop, Centers for disease C, prevention. Acute chemical incidents surveillance—hazardous substances emergency events surveillance, Nine states, 1999–2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries, vol. 64 (Washington, DC, 2002, 2015), pp. 1–9

  35. R.K. Gangopadhyay, S.K. Das, M. Mukherjee, Chlorine leakage from bonnet of a valve in a bullet: a case study. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 18(4), 526–530 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. N.A.E. Hussin, K. Kidam, A. Johari, H. Hashim, Suitability analysis of corrective actions to prevent major chemical process accidents. J. Teknol. 79(3), 97–106 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  37. L. Zhou, G. Fu, Y. Xue, Human and organizational factors in Chinese hazardous chemical accidents: a case study of the ‘8.12’ Tianjin Port fire and explosion using the HFACS-HC. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 24(3), 329–340 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. C. Zhu, J. Zhu, L. Wang, M.S. Mannan, Lessons learned from analyzing a VCE accident at a chemical plant. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 50, 397–402 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. E. Mihailidou, K. Antoniadis, M. Assael, The 319 major industrial accidents since 1917. Int. Rev. Chem. Eng. 4, 529–540 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  40. S. Jing, X. Liu, C. Cheng, X. Shang, X. Gang (eds.) Study on a process safety management system: design of a chemical accident database (2014)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Sadeghi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadeghi, F., Khoshmanesh zadeh, B., Fatemi, F. et al. Effective Parameters on Chemical Accidents Occurrence: Findings from a Systematic Review. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 20, 1184–1191 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-00923-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-00923-9

Keywords

Navigation