Advertisement

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 457–466 | Cite as

Preventive Maintenance Policies for Equipment Under Condition Monitoring Based on Two Types of Failure Rate

  • Yunzhi Yao
  • Chen Meng
  • Cheng Wang
  • Saisai Jin
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed

Abstract

In this article, we deal with optimal preventive maintenance policies based on online condition monitoring. The failure rate function is important for maintenance decisions. Two concepts of failure are proposed and the computing method based on condition monitoring data is given. Both un-repairable and repairable equipment are taken into consideration. For repairable equipment, the degree of degradation and failure rate will decrease after maintenance. The result of the simulation shows that taking the two types of failure rate functions into account will make the expected cost rate less than the classical method. So we draw a conclusion that the two types of failure rate functions are advantageous in maintenance decisions.

Keywords

Preventive maintenance policy Condition monitoring data Failure rate Degradation degree 

References

  1. 1.
    B. Bergquist, P. Soderholm, Data analysis for condition-based railway infrastructure maintenance. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 31(5), 773–781 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    X. Liu, J. Li, K.N. Al-Khalifa, A.S. Hamouda, D.W. Coit, E.A. Elsayed, Condition-based maintenance for continuously monitored degrading systems with multiple failure modes. IIE Trans. 45(4), 422–435 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Koochaki, A.C. Jos, H. Wortmann, W. Klingenberg, The influence of condition-based maintenance on workforce planning and maintenance scheduling. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51(8), 2339–2351 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Ashok, G. Subra, Application of statistical techniques and neural networks in condition-based maintenance. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 29(3), 439–461 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.V. Phuc, B. Christophe, Condition-based maintenance with imperfect preventive repairs for a deteriorating production system. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 28(6), 624–633 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Do, A. Voisin, E. Levrat, A.B. Iung, A Proactive condition-based maintenance strategy with both perfect and imperfect maintenance actions. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 133(1), 22–32 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N.J.M. Van, A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94(1), 2–21 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Peng, M. Dong, M.J. Zuo, Current status of machine prognostics in condition-based maintenance: a review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 50(1), 297–313 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Wang, Overview of a semi-stochastic filtering approach for residual life estimation with applications in condition based maintenance. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. O J. Risk Reliab. 255(2), 185–197 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Deloux, B. Castanier, Condition-based maintenance approaches for deteriorating system evolving in a stressful environment. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. O J. Risk Reliab. 222(4), 613–622 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Gebraeel, J. Pan, Prognostic degradation models for computing and updating residual life distributions in a time-varying environment. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 54(4), 539–550 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    I.T. Yu, C.D. Fuh, Estimation of time to hard failure distributions using a three-stage method. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 59(2), 405–412 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Axel, Joint modeling of degradation and failure time data. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 193(5), 1693–1706 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M.J. Zuo, R.Y. Jiang, R.C.M. Yam, Approaches for reliability modeling of continuous-state devices. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 48(1), 9–18 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Lin, M.J. Zuo, R.C.M. Yam, General sequential imperfect preventive maintenance models. Int. J. Reliab. Qual. Saf. Eng. 7(3), 253–266 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. Lin, M.J. Zuo, R.C.M. Yam, Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance models with two categories of failure modes. Naval Res. Logist. 48, 172–183 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Elferik, D.M. Ben, Age-based hybrid model for imperfect preventive maintenance. IIE Trans. 38(4), 365–375 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    X.J. Zhou, L.F. Xi, A dynamic opportunistic maintenance policy for continuously monitored systems. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 12(3), 294–305 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Missilery EngineeringShijiazhuang Mechanical Engineering CollegeShijiazhuangChina
  2. 2.Beijing Aerospace Control CenterBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations