Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 482–488 | Cite as

Failure Analysis of a Ti6Al4V Screw Used in a RASL Procedure

  • Nikhil K. Kar
  • Tim Roig
  • Jaydeep K. Kar
  • Yinghui Hu
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed


A failure analysis investigation was performed on a Ti6Al4V medical implant screw that failed after 1 month of surgical implantation. Light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and finite element analysis (FEA) techniques were utilized to characterize the mode(s) of failure and fracture surfaces. Complete fracture of the screw was observed near the transition from the tapered thread at the back of the screw, to the flute portion towards the front of the screw. Fractographic analysis revealed significant fretting and flattening of the threads, indicating lack of fixation to the bone, and micromotion of the screw during implant life. Off-axis, reverse bending macroscopic beach marks, as well as microscopic fatigue striations were found on opposite sides of the annular fracture surface. These features suggest intermittent cyclic bending led to crack initiation, and propagation of crack fronts originating along circumference of the tapered thread transition region. Microvoid coalescence (overload features) were also found on the fracture surface, as well as secondary cracks along the screw circumference within the thread root. FEA was used to show the development of localized stress concentrations within the thread root radius at the taper transition region, consistent with observed crack initiation areas. The fracture morphology suggests that premature failure occurred because of interacting factors including: a lack of fixation between bone and screw, micromotion of the screw threads against the bone, and reverse bending fatigue within the tapered to flute transition region. These conditions may have been exacerbated by the use of an improper screw diameter or inadequate installation torque.


Titanium alloy Failure analysis Fatigue 



The authors acknowledge and thank the technical staff at Kars’ Advanced Materials Inc. for their discussions and assistance.


  1. 1.
    J. Williams, N. Chawla, Fractography of a neck failure in a double-modular hip implant. Case Stud. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2, 45–50 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Kluess, E. Steinhauser, M. Joseph, U. Koch, M. Ellenrieder, W. Mittelmeier, R. Bader, Laser engravings as reason for mechanical failure of titanium-alloyed total hip stems. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 135, 1027–1031 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Giacaglia, W. de Queiroz Lamas, Pedicle screw rupture: a case study. Case Stud. Eng. Fail. Anal. 4, 64–75 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Cognet, M. Levadoux, X. Martinache, The use of screws in the treatment of scapholunate instability. J. Hand Surg. (Eur. Vol.) 36E(8), 690–693 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    American Society for Metals, ASM metals reference handbook, 2nd edn. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, 1995), pp. 392–393Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Fowler, A. Ilyas, Headless compression screw fixation of scaphoid fractures. Hand Clin. 26, 351–361 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    United States Patent, Patent Number: 6,030,162, Date of Patent 29 Feb, Huebner (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Kabir, Flexible screw design for bone implant application (School of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, 2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Bailey, J. Kuiper, C. Kelly, Biomechanical evaluation of a new composite bioresorbable screw. J. Hand Surg. (Br. Eur. Vol.) 31B(2), 208–212 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikhil K. Kar
    • 1
  • Tim Roig
    • 1
  • Jaydeep K. Kar
    • 1
  • Yinghui Hu
    • 2
  1. 1.KARS’ Advanced Materials Inc.AnaheimUSA
  2. 2.Tencate CompositesCamarilloUSA

Personalised recommendations