Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic Failure Prediction of High Strength Steel Rocket Motor Cases

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In traditional deterministic analysis, uncertainties are either ignored or accounted by applying conservative assumptions. In those cases, only the mean values or nominal values are used in the analysis. Currently, the operating pressure of high strength steel rocket motor cases is predicted by arbitrarily assumed safety factor based on experience. This leads to over weight of motor cases and cost. Hence a methodology is required to predict the operating pressure more accurately by considering optimal safety factor. This paper presents the probabilistic failure assessment methodology to predict the safety factor for the specified reliability using various failure pressure prediction equations. In this study, the scatter in the yield strength, ultimate strength, and thickness of the structure is considered. Monte–Carlo simulation method is used to perform the probabilistic failure assessment. A suitable failure pressure prediction equation is identified among thirteen equations using stress–strength interference theory based on the statistical measure of the predicted and literature test failure pressure. The reliability-based safety factor is computed for the specified reliability with the use of identified failure pressure prediction equation. The safe operating pressure of steel rocket motor cases is computed for the specified reliability levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AD :

Anderson–darling statistic

e :

2.7828183

n :

Strain hardening exponent

N :

Factor of safety

p :

Probability

r :

Radius, R i ≤ r ≤ R o (mm)

R :

Reliability (%)

s :

Predicted failure pressure (MPa)

S :

Literature experimental failure pressure (MPa)

t :

Thickness of cylinder (mm)

u :

Radial displacement (mm)

y :

Margin of safety

z :

Standard normal variate for the specified reliability

α :

Significance level

ε :

Strain

κ :

R o /R i

D i , D o :

Inner and outer diameters of cylinder (mm)

p i :

Internal pressure (MPa)

p m :

Maximum/failure pressure/burst pressure of unflawed vessel (MPa)

R i, R o :

Inner and outer radii of cylinder (mm)

V S :

Coefficient of variation of experimental failure pressure (%)

V s :

Coefficient of variation of predicted failure pressure (%)

x i :

(r + u)/R o

ε i :

Effective strain at inner surface

ε o :

Effective strain at outer surface

ε u :

True strain at ultimate load

ε ult :

Nominal strain at ultimate load

σ 0 :

Material constant in stress–strain equation

σ S :

Standard deviation of experimental failure pressure

σ s :

Standard deviation of predicted failure pressure

σ u :

True stress at ultimate load (MPa)

σ ult :

Ultimate tensile strength (MPa)

σ ys :

Yield strength or 0.2% proof stress (MPa)

μ S :

Mean of experimental failure pressure (MPa)

μ s :

Mean of predicted failure pressure (MPa)

p o :

Operating pressure (MPa)

COV:

Coefficient of variation (%)

References

  1. F.A. Willams, M. Barrere, N.C. Huang, Fundamental aspects of solid propellant rockets (AGARD No.116) (The Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, Technical Services, Slough, UK 1969)

  2. B.H. James, Structural Integrity Analysis of Solid rocket Motors. Conference on Stress and Strain in Engineering (National Committee on Applied Mechanics, The Institution of Engineers, Australia, Brisbane, 1973)

  3. B. Nageswara Rao, Fracture of solid rocket propellant grains. Eng. Fract. Mech. 43, 455–459 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Christopher, B.S.V. Rama Sarma, P.K. Govindan Potti, B. Nageswara Rao, K. Sankaranarayanasamy, A comparative study on failure pressure estimates of unflawed cylindrical vessels. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 79, 53–66 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anghel Calin, Ioan Lazar, Risk assessment for vessels affected by corrosion. Int. J. Periodica Polytech. Ser. Chem. ENG. 48(2), 103–118 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Kleio Avrithi, Strength model uncertainties of burst, yielding and excessive bending of piping, J. Press. Vessel Technol. 131(3), 031207–031218 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D.J. Delph, D.L. Berger, D.G. Harlow, M. Ozturk, Probabilistic lifetime prediction technique for piping under creep conditions. J. Press. Vessel Technol. 132(5), 051206–051212 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J.H. Faupel, Yielding and bursting of characteristics of heavy walled cylinders. Trans. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 78, 1031–1064 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Wellinger, D. Uebing, Festikeitsverhalten dickwandiger hohlzylinder unter innerdruck im vollplastischen bereich, Mitteilungen der Vereinigung der Grosskessel bestizer, Heft. 66, 1960 (in French)

  10. AMS, Boiler and Pressure Vessels Code, (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1962)

  11. C.R. Soderberg, Interpretation of creep tests on tubes. Trans. ASME 63, 737–748 (1941)

    Google Scholar 

  12. L.B. Turner, The stresses in a thick hollow cylinder subjected to internal pressure. Trans. Camb. Phil. Soc. 21, 377–396 (1910)

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Nadai, Plasticity (McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, 1931)

    Google Scholar 

  14. R.W. Bailey, Thick-walled tubes and cylinders under high pressure and temperatures. Eng. (London), 129, 772–777, 785–786, 818–819 (1930)

  15. A. Nadai, Theory of Flow and Fracture of Solids (McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, 1950)

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Marin, F.P.J. Rimrott, Design of Thick Walled Pressure Vessels Based Upon the Plastic Range, Welding Research Council Bulletin Series, No. 41, (1958)

  17. N.L. Svensson, Bursting pressure of cylindrical and spherical vessels. Trans. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 25, 89–96 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  18. C.I. Benjamin, Wei destructive tests of full size rocket motor cases and their applications to light weight design. J. Space Craft Rockets 2, 363–368 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Margetson, Burst pressure predictions of rocket motors, AIAA paper No. 78-1569, AIAA/SAE 14th Joint Propulsion Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 22–27 July 1978

  20. M. Stefan, The Anderson—Darling Statistic, Technical report No. 39, (1979)

  21. W. Yao, X. Chen, W. Luo, M. Tooren, J. Guo, Review of uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design optimization methods for aerospace vehicles. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 47, 450–479 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S.S. Rao, Reliability-Based Design (McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  23. E.F. Franklin, R.F. Joy, Probability Applications in Mechanical Design (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. K.C. Kapur, L.R. Lamberson, Reliability in Engineering Design (Wiley, New York, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Krishnaveni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krishnaveni, A., Christopher, T., Jeyakumar, K. et al. Probabilistic Failure Prediction of High Strength Steel Rocket Motor Cases. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 14, 478–490 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-014-9829-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-014-9829-z

Keywords

Navigation