Advertisement

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 408–415 | Cite as

Performance Evaluation of Potassium Dichromate and Potassium Chromate Inhibitors on Concrete Steel Rebar Corrosion

  • O. A. Omotosho
  • J. O. Okeniyi
  • O. O. Ajayi
Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed

Abstract

This study investigated the performance of potassium dichromate and potassium chromate inhibitors on the corrosion of steel rebar in concrete partially immersed in sulfuric acid and sodium chloride medium. The open circuit potential corrosion monitoring technique was employed for the acidic and marine simulating environments, and potential readings were taken in accordance with ASTM C 876. Inhibiting quality and uniformity of the inhibitors were then analyzed using an extreme value statistical modeling approach of the Weibull probability density distribution for determining the most efficient inhibitor. In the inhibitor concentrations used, the statistically analyzed experimental results identified 0.145 M potassium chromate as exhibiting the best inhibiting quality in sulfuric acid whereas the synergetic admixture of 0.032 M potassium dichromate and 0.097 M potassium chromate was predicted as showing the lowest probability of corrosion risk in sodium chloride solution. However, the overall probabilistic results rated potassium chromate as the best inhibitor compared to potassium dichromate in most of the other concentrations investigated in the study, especially in concrete structures exposed to saline environments.

Keywords

Corrosion inhibitors Performance Passive/active corrosion Extreme value Weibull density distribution 

References

  1. 1.
    Franciskovic, J., Miksic, B., Rogan, I., Tomcic M.: Protection and repair of reinforced concrete structures by means of mci-inhibitors and corrosion protective materials. In: Proceedings on Structural Engineering Conferences: International Conferences on Bridges, p. 554 (2006). Available on the web: http://www.cortecvci.com/Publications/Papers/057%20Protection%20and%20repair%20of%20reinforced%20concrete.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2010
  2. 2.
    Yongmo, X., Hailong, S., Miksic, B.A.: Comparison of inhibitors MCI and NaNO2 in carbonation-induced corrosion. Mater. Perform. 43, 42–46 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loto, C.A.: Effect of inhibitors and admixed chloride on electrochemical corrosion behavior of mild steel reinforcement in concrete in seawater. NACE Corros. Prev. Control 48(9), 759–763 (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berke, N.S.: Corrosion Inhibitors in Concrete. Corrosion 89. Paper 445, NACE, Houston, Texas, pp. 1–10 (1989)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griffin, D.F.: Corrosion of Metals in Concrete, p. 65. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI (1975)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Loto, C.A., Odumbo, E.T.: Electrochemical potential monitoring of corrosion and coating protection of mild steel reinforcement in concrete. Corrosion 45(7), 535 (1989)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Afolabi, A.S.: Synergistic Inhibition of Potassium Chromate and Sodium Nitrite on Mild Steel in Chloride Sulphide Media (2008). Available on the web: http://lejpt.academicdirect.org/A1/143_154.htm. Accessed 18 July 2008
  8. 8.
    Craig, R.J., Wood, L.E.: Effectiveness of corrosion inhibitors and their influence on the physical properties of Portland cement mortars. Highways Rese. Rec. 328, 77–78 (1970)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Treadaway, K.W.J., Russel, A.D.: The inhibition of the corrosion of steel in concrete. Highways Public Works 36, 40 (1968)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Loto, C.A., Okusanya, A.: The influence of clay addition on the electrochemical corrosion behavior of mild steel in concrete. Corros. Prev. Control J. 36(4), 105 (1989)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haynie, F.H.: Statistical treatment of data, data interpretation, and reliability. In: Baboian, R. (ed.) Corrosion Tests and Standards—Application and Interpretation, 2nd edn, pp. 83–88. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Montgomery, D.C., Runger, G.C.: Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burubai, W., Dagogo, G.: Comparative Study of Inhibitors on the Corrosion of Mild Steel Reinforcement in Concrete, Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR Ejorunal. Manuscript BC 06 008, vol. IX (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Izquierdo, D., Alonso, C., Andrade, C., Castellote, M.: Potentiostatic determinations of chloride threshold values for rebar depassivation: Experimental and statistical study. Electrochim. Acta 49, 2731–2739 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roberge, P.R.: Statistical interpretation of corrosion test results. In: Corrosion: Fundamentals, Testing, and Protection, ASM Handbook, vol. 13A, pp. 425–429. ASM International (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roberge, P.R.: Handbook of Corrosion Engineering. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Polyanin, A.D., Manzhirov, A.V.: Handbook of Mathematics for Engineers and Scientists. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Song, T.T.: Fundamentals of Probability and Statistics for Engineers. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, England (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hausmann, D., Hausmann Consulting, D.A.: Long-Term Performance of Steel in Concrete Immersed in Sea Water, NACE International, Corrosion 0428, p. 1 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentCovenant UniversityOtaNigeria

Personalised recommendations