Abstract
The science of failure prevention relies heavily on the experience of personnel on a project. As the nation is about to face a tremendous decline in the experienced workforce due to the baby boomer generation’s retirement, it is critical to begin focusing on capturing their knowledge. Cataloging and communicating the knowledge of potential failures is critical to prevent engineering disasters. Many companies have adopted failure-reporting systems that allow them to record their engineering failures to promote failure prevention. While recording this information is vital to learning from past mistakes, often the information is not stored so that engineers and designers can easily recall this valuable linguistic information and use it to improve designs. Therefore, more effective systems for cataloging and utilizing corporate memory of recorded failure events are needed. This article presents the design of a computational linguistic database to support the failure prevention tool, the risk in early design (RED) method. RED promotes failure prevention by identifying failure risks as early as the conceptual phase of product design, where impacts of failure prevention are greatest. It uses a database populated by historical failure event information to present specific areas that are at risk of failure in a product.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beiter, K.A., Cheldelin, B., Ishii, K.: Assembly quality method: a tool in aid of product strategy, design, and process improvement. In: Proceedings of the Design Engineering Technical Conferences, ASME, Baltimore, MD (2000)
Hawkins, P.G., Woolons, D.J.: Failure modes and effects analysis of complex engineering systems using functional models. Artif. Intell. Eng. 12, 375–395 (1998)
Wirth, R., et al.: Knowledge-based support anlysis for the analysis of failure modes and effects. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 9(3), 219–229 (1996)
Kurfman, M., Rajan, J., Stone, R., Wood, K., Stock, M.: Experimental studies assessing the repeatability of a functional modeling derivation method. J. Mech. Des. 125(4), 682–693 (2003)
Otto, K., Wood, K.: Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering, Systematic Design, and New Product Development. Prentice-Hall, New York (2001)
Hirtz, J., Stone, R., McAdams, D., Szykman, S., Wood, K.: A functional basis for engineering design: reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Res. Eng. Des. 13(2), 65–82 (2002)
Miles, L.: Techniques of Value Analysis Engineering. McGraw-Hill (1972)
Pahl, G., Beitz, W.: Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Design Council, London (1984)
Greer, J., Stock, M., Stone, R., Wood, K.: Enumerating the component space: first steps toward a design naming convention for mechanical parts. In: Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Chicago, IL (2003)
Tumer, I., Stone, R., Bell, D.: Requirements for a failure mode taxonomy for use in conceptual design. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm (2003)
Collins, J.A., Hagan, B.T., Bratt, H.M.: The failure experience matrix: a useful design tool. ASME J. Eng. Ind. August, 1074–1079 (1976)
Barbour, G.L.: Failure model and effects analysis by matrix method. In: Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (1977)
Collins, J.A.: Mechanical Reliability and Design. Wiley (1993)
Goddard, P.L., Dussalt, H.B.: The automated matrix FMEA-A logistics engineering tool. In: Proceedings of the Society of Logistics Engineers’ 19th Annual Symposium (1984)
Henning, S., Paasch, R.: Diagnostic analysis of mechanical systems. In: Proceedings of the Design Engineering Technical Conferences, ASME, Baltimore, MD (2000)
Grantham Lough, K., Stone, R., Tumer, I.: Function based risk assessment: mapping function to likelihood. In: Proceedings of 2005 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conference, September 24–28, Long Beach, CA
Grantham Lough, K., Stone, R., Tumer, I.: The risk in early design (RED) method. J. Eng. Des. on-line November 21, 2007, edition, hardcopy pending
Grantham Lough, K., Stone, R., Tumer, I.: Prescribing and implementing the risk in early design (RED) method. J. Ind. Syst. Eng., publication pending
Stone, R., Tumer, I., Van Wie, M.: The function failure design method. J. Mech. Des. 127(3), 397–407 (2005)
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense. DSMC Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition, 2nd edn. Defense Systems Management College Press, Fort Belvoir, VA (1999)
Van Wie, M., Grantham Lough, K., Stone, R., Barrientos, F., Tumer, I.: An analysis of risk and function information in early stage design. Submitted to Proceedings of Design Engineering Technical Conference DETC, Long Beach, CA (2005)
ASM International. Handbook of Case Histories in Failure Analysis, vol. 1, pp. 3–8. USA (1992)
Wang, J., Roush, M.: What Every Engineer Should Know About Risk Engineering and Management. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (2002)
Uder, S., Stone, R., Tumer, I.: Function based risk assessment and failure prediction for unmanned space missions. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress IMECE 2004-60846
Brown, A.F.: Development of a method for flight anomaly characterization. JPL Technical Report, JPL D-11382. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA (1994)
Quinn, J.D.: Flight P/FRs and the design review process. JPL Technical Report, JPL D-11381. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasedena, CA (1994)
National Transportation Safety Board. www.ntsb.gov (2001)
Wikipedia, “Galileo spacecraft.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_spacecraft (2006)
NASA, Public Lessons Learned System Database. http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsrtype.html?id=36&sdb=nasacenters&name=NASA+Public+Lessons+Learned+System+(PLLS)+Database (2004)
NASA, Public Lessons Learned System Database, PLLS Data Entry: 0305. http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsrtype.html?id=36&sdb=nasacenters&name=NASA+Public+Lessons+Learned+System+(PLLS)+Database (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Consequence | Likelihood | |
|---|---|---|
L1-Prod, C1-Max Risk | ||
Stop gas fails due to abrasive wear | 3 | 1 |
Stop gas fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Stop gas fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Stop gas fails due to thermal shock | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to abrasive wear | 5 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to buckling | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to corrosion fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to direct chemical attack | 5 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 5 | 4 |
Import gas fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to surface fatigue | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to temperature-induced deformation | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to thermal fatigue | 5 | 2 |
Import gas fails due to thermal shock | 5 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to yielding | 4 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to buckling | 3 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to corrosion fatigue | 4 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to yielding | 4 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to corrosion fatigue | 4 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to yielding | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to abrasive wear | 5 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to buckling | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to corrosion fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to direct chemical attack | 5 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 5 | 4 |
Guide gas fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to surface fatigue | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to temperature-induced deformation | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to thermal fatigue | 5 | 2 |
Guide gas fails due to thermal shock | 5 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to yielding | 4 | 1 |
Guide thermal energy fails due to abrasive wear | 3 | 1 |
Guide thermal energy fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide thermal energy fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide thermal energy fails due to thermal shock | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to abrasive wear | 5 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to corrosion fatigue | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to creep | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to direct chemical attack | 5 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 5 | 5 |
Export thermal energy fails due to impact fracture | 5 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to intergranular corrosion | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to surface fatigue | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to temperature-induced deformation | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to thermal fatigue | 5 | 2 |
Export thermal energy fails due to thermal shock | 5 | 2 |
Export thermal energy fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to yielding | 4 | 3 |
L2-Agg, C1-Max Risk | ||
Stop gas fails due to abrasive wear | 3 | 1 |
Stop gas fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Stop gas fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Stop gas fails due to thermal shock | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to abrasive wear | 5 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to buckling | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to corrosion fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to direct chemical attack | 5 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 5 | 2 |
Import gas fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to surface fatigue | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to temperature-induced deformation | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to thermal fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to thermal shock | 5 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to yielding | 4 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to buckling | 3 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to corrosion fatigue | 4 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to yielding | 4 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to corrosion fatigue | 4 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to yielding | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to abrasive wear | 5 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to buckling | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to corrosion fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to direct chemical attack | 5 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 5 | 2 |
Guide gas fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to surface fatigue | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to temperature-induced deformation | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to thermal fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to thermal shock | 5 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to yielding | 4 | 1 |
Guide thermal energy fails due to abrasive wear | 3 | 1 |
Guide thermal energy fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide thermal energy fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide thermal energy fails due to thermal shock | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to abrasive wear | 5 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to corrosion fatigue | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to creep | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to direct chemical attack | 5 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 5 | 3 |
Export thermal energy fails due to impact fracture | 5 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to intergranular corrosion | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to surface fatigue | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to temperature-induced deformation | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to thermal fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to thermal shock | 5 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to yielding | 4 | 2 |
L1-Prod, C2-Ave Aug Risk | ||
Stop gas fails due to abrasive wear | 3 | 1 |
Stop gas fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Stop gas fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Stop gas fails due to thermal shock | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to abrasive wear | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to buckling | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to corrosion fatigue | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to direct chemical attack | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 4 | 4 |
Import gas fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to surface fatigue | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to temperature-induced deformation | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to thermal fatigue | 5 | 2 |
Import gas fails due to thermal shock | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to yielding | 4 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to buckling | 3 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to corrosion fatigue | 4 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to yielding | 4 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to corrosion fatigue | 4 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to electrical overstress. | 4 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to yielding | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to abrasive wear | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to buckling | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to corrosion fatigue | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to direct chemical attack | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 4 | 4 |
Guide gas fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to surface fatigue | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to temperature-induced deformation | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to thermal fatigue | 5 | 2 |
Guide gas fails due to thermal shock | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to yielding | 4 | 1 |
Guide thermal energy fails due to abrasive wear | 3 | 1 |
Guide thermal energy fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide thermal energy fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide thermal energy fails due to thermal shock | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to abrasive wear | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to corrosion fatigue | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to creep | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to direct chemical attack | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 4 | 5 |
Export thermal energy fails due to impact fracture | 5 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to surface fatigue | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to temperature-induced deformation | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to thermal fatigue | 5 | 2 |
Export thermal energy fails due to thermal shock | 4 | 2 |
Export thermal energy fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to yielding | 4 | 3 |
L2-Agg, C2-Ave Aug Risk | ||
Stop gas fails due to abrasive wear | 3 | 1 |
Stop gas fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Stop gas fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Stop gas fails due to thermal shock | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to abrasive wear | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to buckling | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to corrosion fatigue | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to direct chemical attack | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 4 | 2 |
Import gas fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to surface fatigue | 3 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to temperature-induced deformation | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to thermal fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to thermal shock | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Import gas fails due to yielding | 4 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to buckling | 3 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to corrosion fatigue | 4 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Store gas fails due to yielding | 4 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to corrosion fatigue | 4 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Supply gas fails due to yielding | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to abrasive wear | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to buckling | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to corrosion fatigue | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to direct chemical attack | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 4 | 2 |
Guide gas fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to surface fatigue | 3 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to temperature-induced deformation | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to thermal fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to thermal shock | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Guide gas fails due to yielding | 4 | 1 |
Guide thermal energy fails due to abrasive wear | 3 | 1 |
Guide thermal energy fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide thermal energy fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Guide thermal energy fails due to thermal shock | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to abrasive wear | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to cavitation erosion | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to corrosion fatigue | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to creep | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to direct chemical attack | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to electrical overstress | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to erosion corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to high-cycle fatigue | 4 | 3 |
Export thermal energy fails due to impact fracture | 5 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to intergranular corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to pitting corrosion | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to surface fatigue | 3 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to temperature-induced deformation | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to thermal fatigue | 5 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to thermal shock | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to undercurrent | 4 | 1 |
Export thermal energy fails due to yielding | 4 | 2 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grantham Lough, K.A., Stone, R.B. & Tumer, I.Y. Failure Prevention in Design Through Effective Catalogue Utilization of Historical Failure Events. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 8, 469–481 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-008-9160-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-008-9160-7