Skip to main content
Log in

Fracture Mechanics Determinations of Allowable Crack Size in Railroad Rails

  • Feature
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An evaluation of fatigue behavior of rail steel is necessary to ensure rail transportation safety. Fatigue in these steels was studied with fracture mechanics techniques. The goal of these studies was to find out the appropriate way of preventing a crack from reaching its critical size in the rail. Tests were conducted on rail head, and transverse head cracks were analyzed through damage tolerance concepts. Critical crack size and crack growth characteristics for the rail were determined, and the residual service life was calculated for defective segments of the rails. Additionally, the allowable crack size for different nondestructive testing intervals was determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrew, P., Parnell, T.K., Caligiuri, D., Sire, A.: “Rail Cracking Due to Residual Stress from Manufacturing and Heat Treating,” Parnell Engineering & Consulting (2003–2004)

  2. Zerbst, U., Madler, K., Hintze, H.: Fracture mechanics in railway applications—an overview. Eng. Frac. Mech. 72, 163–194 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Edel, K.O.: Allowable crack sizes for railway wheels and rails. Theoret. Appl. Fracture Mech. 9, 75–82 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, K.L.: The strength of surfaces in rolling contact. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 203, 151–163 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ishida, M., Abe, N.: Experimental study on rolling contact fatigue from the aspect of residual stress. Wear 191, 65–71 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeong, D.Y.: “Correlations between Rail Defect Growth Data and Engineering Analyses, Part I: Laboratory Tests,” Volpe Center Technical Report for the UIC/WEC Joint Research Project on Rail Defect Management, Cambridge, MA (2003)

  7. Technical Specification for the Supply of Rail UIC 860 Infrastructure Commission from International Union of Railways (1986)

  8. “Recommended Procedure for the Determination of the Plane Strain Fracture Toughness (KIC) of Rail Steels,” ORE report 3, Office for Research and Experiments of the International Union of Railroads, Utrecht, The Netherlands (1987)

  9. “Fracture Mechanics Toughness Tests,” BS 7448, British Standards Institute

  10. “Standard Test Method for Plane Strain Fracture Toughness (KIC) of Metallic Materials,” E 399-83, American Society of Testing and Materials

  11. Forsyth, P.J.E., Ryder, D.A.: Some results of the examination of aluminum specimen fracture surfaces. Metallurgica, 63, 117 (1961)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeong, D.Y.: “Correlations between Rail Defect Growth Data and Engineering Analyses, Part II: Field Tests,” Volpe Center Technical Report for the UIC/WEC Joint Research Project on Rail Defect Management, Cambridge, MA (2003)

  13. Scutti, J.J., Pelloux, R.M., Fuquen-Moleno, R.: Fatigue behavior of a rail steel, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 7, 121–135 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Edel, K.O.: Investigation of critical flaws in railway wheels. Theoret. Appl. Fracture Mech. 4, 109–116 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Ravaee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ravaee, R., Hassani, A. Fracture Mechanics Determinations of Allowable Crack Size in Railroad Rails. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 7, 305–310 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-007-9068-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-007-9068-7

Keywords

Navigation