Skip to main content
Log in

Traditional Metallurgy, Nanotechnologies, and Structural Materials: A Sorby Award Lecture

  • Feature
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional metallurgical processes are among the many “old fashion” practices that use nanoparticles to control the behavior of materials. Many of these practices were developed long before microscopy could resolve nanoscale features, yet the practitioners learned to manipulate and control microstructural elements that they could neither see nor identify. Furthermore, these early practitioners used that control to modify microstructures and develop desired material properties. Centuries old colored glass, ancient high-strength steels and medieval organ pipes derived many of their desirable features through control of nanoparticles in their microstructures. Henry Sorby was among the first to recognize that the properties of rocks, minerals, metals, and organic materials were controlled by microstructure. However, Mr. Sorby was accused of the folly of trying to study mountains with a fsmicroscope. Although he could not resolve nanoscale microstructural features, Mr. Sorby’s observations revolutionized the study of materials. The importance of nanoscale microstructural elements should be emphasized, however, because the present foundation for structural materials was built by manipulating those features. That foundation currently supports several multibillion dollar industries but is not generally considered when the nanomaterials revolution is discussed. This lecture demonstrates that using nanotechnologies to control the behavior of metallic materials is almost as old as the practice of metallurgy and that many of the emergent nanomaterials technologists are walking along pathways previously paved by traditional metallurgists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rean, O., Roca, M.C.: Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. J. Nanoparticle Res. 8(2), 2006, Prespectives, Springer Science, Preprint

  2. Nel, A., Xia, T., Madler, L., Li, N.: Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311, 622 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. “Interim Guideline for Working Safely with Nanomaterials” Texas A&M University, contact bree@tamu.edu, (2006)

  4. Brenner, S.S.: Tensile strength of whiskers. JAP 27, 1484 (1956)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H.: 52nd Hatfield memorial lecture: large hunks of very strong steel. Mater. Sci. Technol. 21, (2005)

  6. Ma, F., Xu, K.W.: Size—dependent theoretical tensile strength and other mechanical properties of [001] oriented Au, Ag and Cu nanowires. J. Mater. Res. 21, 2810 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reed-Hill, R.E.: Physical Metallurgy Principles, Second Edition, pp. 144–146. D. Van Norstand Company, New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Orowan, E.: Z. Phys. 89, 634 (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fletcher, E.E.: High Strength Low Allow Steels, pp. 125–129. Battelle Press, Columbus, OH (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dayal, R.K., Parvathavarthini, N., Raj, B.: Influence of metallurgical variables on sensitization kinetics in austenitic stainless steels. Int. Mater. Rev. (2005)

  11. Latanison, R.M., Staehle, R.W.: Stress Corrosion Cracking of Iron, Chromium, Nickel Alloys. Fundamental Aspects of Stress Corrosion Cracking, p. 214. NACE, Houston, TX (1969)

  12. Mayer, H.: Fatigue crack growth and threshold measurements at very high frequencies. Int. Mater. Rev. 44(1), 1 (1999)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hollingsworth, E.H., Hunsicker, H.Y.: Corrosion of Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys, p. 583, Ninth Edition, Metals Handbook, vol. 13, Corrosion, (1987)

  14. Madia, W.J.: Building the future on atom at a time: realizing Feynman’s vision. Met. Matl. Trans. A 37A, 2905 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baker, T.N., Li, Y., Wilson, J.A., Crave, A.J., Crowther, D.N.: Evolution of precipitates, in particular cruciform and cuboid precipitates, during simulated direct charging of thin slab cast vanadium microalloyed steel. Mater. Sci. Technol. 20, 720 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lasa, L., Rodriquez-Ibabe, J.M.: Toughness and fatigue behavior of eutectic and hypereutectic Al-Si-Cu-Mg alloys produced through lost foam and squeeze casting. Mater. Sci. Technol. 20, 1599 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Markandeyer, R., Nagarjuna, S., Sarma, D.S.: Precipitation hardening of Cu-Ti-Zr alloys. Mater. Sci. Technol. 20, 849 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Laha, K., Kyona, J., Sasaki, T., Kishinoto, S., Shinyu, N.: Improved creep strength and ductility of type 347 austenitic stainless steel through the self healing effect of boron on creep cavities. Met. Matl. Trans. A 36A, 399 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Beaubois, V., Huez, J., Coste, S., Brucelle, O., Lacaze, J.: Short term precipitation kinetics of delta phase in strain free inconel 718 alloy. Mater. Sci. Technol. 20, 1019 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rao, G.A., Srinivan, M., Sarma, D.S.: Effect of solution treatment temperature on microstructure and mechanical properties of hot isostatically pressed superalloy Inconel 718. Mater. Sci. Technol. 20, 1161 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Xiao, D.H., Wang, J.N., Ding, D.Y.: Effect of minor cerium additions on microstructure and mechanical properties of cast Al-Cu-Mg-Ag alloy. Mater. Sci. Technol. 20, 1237 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim, J.I.L., Miyazaki, S.: Comparison of shape memory characteristics of a Ti-50.9At. Pct. Ni alloy aged at 473 and 673 K. Met. Matl. Trans. A 36A, 3301 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sehitoglu, H., Foglesong, T., Maier, H.J.: Precipitate effects on the mechanical behavior of aluminum copper alloys: part I. experiments. Met. Matl. Trans. A 36A, 749 (2005)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee, S.W., Yeh, J.W.: Microstructural evolution and superplasticity of Al-5.8 Mg- 0.23 Mn alloys processed by reciprocating extrusion. Met. Matl. Trans. A 36A, 2225 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Feynman, H.: There’s plenty of room at the bottom. Eng. Sci. 23(5), 22–36 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. R. Louthan Jr..

Additional information

This article was presented at "Microscopy & Microanalysis 2007" in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., on Auguest 6, 2007.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Louthan, M.R. Traditional Metallurgy, Nanotechnologies, and Structural Materials: A Sorby Award Lecture. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 7, 229–238 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-007-9055-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-007-9055-z

Keywords

Navigation