Skip to main content
Log in

Productıon and Cleaning of Lattice Structures Used in the Space and Aerospace Industry with Metal Additive Manufacturing Method

  • Technical Article
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thanks to additive manufacturing, the use of lattice structures in aviation and space industry, especially heat exchangers, fuel nozzles and turbo machines located at the front of airplanes has increased. The production of computer-designed parts with the desired precision and geometry is important for concepts such as assembly, wear and surface properties. Problems encountered in selective laser melting (SLM) such as porosity, powder particle adhesions, affect assembly and surface properties. For this reason, cleaning is inevitable in sensitive systems used in the aerospace industry to have ready-to-use products after production or to prevent dust particles from breaking and causing problems in the workflow. To this purpose, chemical washing process was applied to improve the surface quality of the lattice structures and the healing effects of the acids used on the surfaces were investigated. In the experiment, nine lattice structures were produced from CoCr alloy and the effects of three different acid solutions prepared using hydrofluoric acid, nitric acid, sulfuric acid and hydrochloric acid on surface cleaning capacity were examined. The changes in the models immersed in the acid solution using the controlled immersion method for 180 seconds are presented comparatively. As a result of the experiment, it was seen that especially the solution containing hydrofluoric acid contributed to the improvement of the surface properties after production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Qiu, N.J. Adkins and M.M. Attallah, Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Selectively Laser-Melted and of HIPed Laser-Melted Ti–6Al–4V, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2013, 578, p 230–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. D.A. Hollander, M. Von Walter, T. Wirtz, R. Sellei, B. Schmidt-Rohlfing, O. Paar and H.J. Erli, Structural, Mechanical and in vitro Characterization of İndividually Structured Ti–6Al–4V Produced by Direct Laser Forming, Biomaterials, 2006, 27(7), p 955–963.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Gong, K. Rafiab, Gu. Hengfeng, T. Starr and B. Stucker, Analysis of Defect Generation in Ti–6Al–4V Parts Made Using Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Processes, Addit. Manuf., 2014, 1, p 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Jiang, M. Rifat and S. Basu, Impact of Surface Roughness and Porosity on Lattice Structures Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing-A Computational Study, Proc. Manuf., 2020, 48, p 781–789.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Hague, I. Campbell and P. Dickens, Implications on Design of Rapid Manufacturing, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 2003, 217(1), p 25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu. Liu, P. Kamm, F. García-Moreno, J. Banhart and D. Pasini, Elastic and Failure Response of İmperfect Three-Dimensional Metallic Lattices: the Role of Geometric Defects İnduced by Selective Laser Melting, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2017, 107, p 160–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. X. Zhou, D. Wang, X. Liu, DanDan Zhang, Qu. Shilian, J. Ma, G. London, Z. Shen and W. Liu, 3D-İmaging of Selective Laser Melting Defects in a Co–Cr–Mo Alloy by Synchrotron Radiation Micro-CT, Acta Mater., 2015, 98, p 1–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Kempen, B. Vrancken, S. Buls, L. Thijs, J. Van Humbeeck, J. P. Kruth, Selective Laser Melting of Crack-Free High Density M2 High Speed Steel Parts by Baseplate Preheating, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 136 (6) (2014)

  9. W. Di, Y. Yongqiang, S. Xubin and C. Yonghua, Study on Energy İnput and its İnfluences on Single-Track, Multi-track, and Multi-layer in SLM, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2012, 58(9), p 1189–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Strano, L. Hao, R.M. Everson and K.E. Evans, Surface Roughness Analysis, Modelling and Prediction in Selective Laser Melting, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2013, 213(4), p 589–597.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Simchi, The Role of Particle Size on the Laser Sintering of İron Powder, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2004, 35(5), p 937–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Łyczkowska, P. Szymczyk, B. Dybała and E. Chlebus, Chemical Polishing of Scaffolds Made of Ti–6Al–7Nb Alloy by Additive Manufacturing, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 2014, 14(4), p 586–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Wysocki, P. Maj, A. Krawczyńska, K. Rożniatowski and J. Zdunek, Krzysztof Jan Kurzydłowski and Wojciech Święszkowski, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties İnvestigation of CP Titanium Processed by Selective Laser Melting (SLM), J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2017, 241, p 13–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Tyagi, T. Goulet, C. Riso and F. Garcia-Moreno, Reducing Surface Roughness by Chemical Polishing of Additively Manufactured 3D Printed 316 Stainless Steel Components, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2019, 100(9), p 2895–2900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Neda, S. Turenne and V. Brailovski, Surface Finish Control of Additively-Manufactured Inconel 625 Components Using Combined Chemical-Abrasive Flow Polishing, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2018, 252, p 728–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. N. Sunay, M. Kaya, Y. Kaynak, Chemical Post-processing Methods for Enhancing Surface Properties of Parts Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing, A Rev. Sigma J. Eng. Nat. Sci./Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 38 (4) (2020)

  17. C.L. Jones, I. Helmar, L. Diehl, J. Tinley, K.D. Chappuis, J.F. Sullivian, Methods of Designing Three-Dimensional Lattice Structures for İmplants, U.S. Patent No. 10.695.184. 30 Jun. (2020)

  18. J. Kadkhodapour, H. Montazerian, ACh. Darabi, A.P. Anaraki, S.M. Ahmadi, A.A. Zadpoor and S. Schmauder, Failure Mechanisms of Additively Manufactured Porous Biomaterials: Effects of Porosity and Type of Unit Cell, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2015, 50, p 180–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Dumas, P. Terriault and V. Brailovski, Modelling and Characterization of a Porosity Graded Lattice Structure for Additively Manufactured Biomaterials, Mater. Des., 2017, 121, p 383–392.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Nishi, K. Seto, Y. Kamashita, A. Kaji, A. Kurono and E. Nagaoka, Survival of Microorganisms on Complete Dentures Following Ultrasonic Cleaning Combined With İmmersion in Peroxide-Based Cleanser Solution, Gerodontology, 2014, 31(3), p 202–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Chekioua and R. Delimi, Purification of H2SO4 of Pickling Bath Contaminated by Fe (II) İons Using Electrodialysis Process, Energy Proc., 2015, 74, p 1418–1433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. S.M. Kim, A. Hsu, Y.-H. Lee, M. Dresselhaus, T. Palacios, K.K. Kim and J. Kong, The Effect of Copper Pre-cleaning on Graphene Synthesis, Nanotechnology, 2013, 24(36), p 365602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Iversen, B. Leffler, Aqueous Corrosion of Stainless Steels (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2010) pp. 1802-1878

  24. B. Yaylali, E.Y. Yazici, O. Celep, H. Deveci, Extraction of Cobalt From a Flotation Tailings in Different Mineral Acids Under Oxidative Conditions, in 15th International Mineral Processing Symposium (IMPS). (2016)

  25. T.D. Ngo, A. Kashani, G. Imbalzano, K.T.Q. Nguyen and D. Hui, Additive Manufacturing (3D printing): A Review of Materials, Methods, Applications and Challenges, Compos. Part B. Eng., 2018, 143, p 172–196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Agrawal and K.K. Sahu, An Overview Of The Recovery of Acid From Spent Acidic Solutions From Steel and Electroplating İndustries, J. Hazard. Mater., 2009, 171(1–3), p 61–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Aerospace: EADS and EOS, Study Demonstrates Savings Potential for DMLS in the Aerospace İndustry, www.eos.info

  28. A.B. Spierings, N. Herres, G. Levy, Influence of the Particle Size Distribution on Surface Quality and Mechanical Properties in AM Steel Parts, Rapid Prototyp. J. (2011)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Özgün Ceren Akbay.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This invited article is part of a special issue in the Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance entitled “Space and Aerospace Exploration Revolution: Metal Additive Manufacturing.” The issue was organized by Shahrooz Nafisi, Relativity Space; Paul Gradl, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center; Douglas Hofmann, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology; and Reza Ghomashchi, The University of Adelaide, Australia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akbay, Ö.C., Bahçe, E., Uysal, A. et al. Productıon and Cleaning of Lattice Structures Used in the Space and Aerospace Industry with Metal Additive Manufacturing Method. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 31, 6310–6321 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06541-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06541-2

Keywords

Navigation