Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Welding Consumables on the Ballistic Performance of Shielded Metal Arc Welded Dissimilar Armor Steel Joints

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The welding of dissimilar armor-grade steels is always challenging due to their carbon equivalent (CE) differences. In this investigation, dissimilar armor-grade steels (rolled homogenous armor (RHA) steels and ultra-high hard armor (UHA) steel) are welded using three electrodes, namely low hydrogen ferritic (LHF), austenitic stainless steel (ASS), and duplex stainless steel (DSS) by shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) process. All the three joints were tested against the 7.62 × 54 mm armor-piercing (AP) projectile. The projectile was wholly stopped at the Weld Metal (WM). Three modes of failures were observed in WM (1) wear debris (WD), (2) wear debris + continuous cracks (WDCC), and (3) fine wear debris + microcracks (FWDMC). The joint fabricated using ASS electrode with the level of failure of WDCC performs better than other joints with the lowest area density of 70 kg/m2 due to the high energy absorption capability of the austenite phase and higher strain hardening properties. At the interface, the martensitic band (MB) increases the hardness and has a vital role in determining ballistic resistance. The impact toughness and ductility of the weld metal play a significant role in deciding the ballistic performance more than hardness and strength properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

UHA:

Ultra-high hard armor

RHA:

Rolled homogenous armor

Q&T:

Quenched and tempered

BM:

Base metal

WM:

Weld metal

SMAW:

Shielded metal arc welding

GMAW:

Gas metal arc welding

CE:

Carbon equivalent

AFVs:

Armor fighting vehicles

MBTs:

Main battle tanks

ASS:

Austenitic stainless steel

DSS:

Duplex stainless steel

LHF:

Low hydrogen ferritic

SURA:

Joints made by SMAW process using ASS electrodes

SURD:

Joints made by SMAW process using DSS electrodes

SURF:

Joints made by SMAW process using LHF electrodes

UMZ:

Unmixed zone

MB:

Martensitic band

AP:

Armor piercing

FCC:

Face centered cubic

BCT:

Body centered tetragonal

BCC:

Body centered cubic

ISO:

International Organization for Standardization

K-TIG:

Keyhole-tungsten inert gas

HIC:

Hydrogen-induced cracking

HAZ:

Heat-affected zone

WPS:

Welding procedure specification

AWS:

American welding society

WPQR:

Welding procedure qualification record

ASME:

American Society of Mechanical Engineers

DAQ:

Data acquisition system

RT:

Radiography testing

PAUT:

Phased array ultrasonic testing

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

DoP:

Depth of penetration

WoP:

Width of penetration

ASTM:

American Society for Testing and Materials

NSR:

Notch strength ratio

SEM:

Scanning electron microscopy

DF:

Delta ferrite

A:

Austenite

M:

Martensite

B:

Bainite

FGHAZ:

Fine grain heat-affected zone

CGHAZ:

Coarse grain heat-affected zone

OES:

Optical emission spectrometer

FN:

Ferrite number

M s :

Martensitic start

B s :

Bainitic start

WD:

Wear debris

WDCC:

Wear debris + continuous cracks

FWDMC:

Fine wear debris + microcracks

Reference

  1. G. Magudeeswaran, V. Balasubramanian and G. Madhusudan Reddy, Metallurgical Characteristics of Armour Steel Welded Joints Used for Combat Vehicle Construction, Def. Technol., 2018, 14, p 590–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. F. Ade, Ballistic Qualification of Armor Steel Weldments, Weld. J., 1991, 70, p 53–58.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Madhusudhan Reddy and T. Mohandas, Ballistic Performance of High-Strength Low-Alloy Steel Weldments, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1996, 57, p 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P.K. Jena, B. Mishra, K. Siva Kumar and T.B. Bhat, An Experimental Study on the Ballistic Impact Behavior of Some Metallic Armour Materials Against 7.62 mm Deformable Projectile, Mater. Des., 2010, 31, p 3308–3316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Mishra, P.K. Jena, B. Ramakrishna, V. Madhu, T.B. Bhat and N.K. Gupta, Effect of Tempering Temperature, Plate Thickness and Presence of Holes on Ballistic Impact Behavior and ASB Formation of a High Strength Steel, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2012, 44, p 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S.N. Dikshit, Influence of Hardness on Perforation Velocity in Steel Armour Plates, Def. Sci. J., 2000, 50, p 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S.N. Dikshit, V.V. Kutumbarao and G. Sundararajan, The Influence of Plate Hardness on the Ballistic Penetration of Thick Steel Plates, Int. J. Impact Eng., 1995, 16, p 293–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S.N. Dikshit, Ballistic Behaviour of Tempered Steel Armour Plates under Plane Strain Condition, Def. Sci. J., 1998, 48, p 167–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Demir, M. Übeyli and R.O. Yildirim, Investigation on the Ballistic Impact Behavior of Various Alloys against 7.62 Mm Armor Piercing Projectile, Mater. Des., 2008, 29, p 2009–2016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Mishra, P.K. Jena, B. Hazarika, K. Siva Kumar and T. Balakrishna Bhat, An Experimental Study on the Shattering Behavior of a High Strength Armour Steel under Blast and Long Rod Penetrator Impact, Mater. Des., 2010, 31, p 3971–3981.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. C.E. Anderson, V. Hohler, J.D. Walker and A.J. Stilp, Influence of Projectile Hardness on Ballistic Performance, Int. J. Impact Eng., 1999, 6, p 619–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Trajkovski, R. Kunc, V. Pepel and I. Prebil, Flow and Fracture Behavior of High-Strength Armor Steel PROTAC 500, Mater. Des., 2015, 66, p 37–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. N. Kiliç, S. Bedir, A. Erdik, B. Ekici, A. Taşdemirci and M. Güden, Ballistic Behavior of High Hardness Perforated Armor Plates against 7.62mm Armor Piercing Projectile, Mater. Des., 2014, 63, p 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Kumbhar, P. Ponguru Senthil and A.K. Gogia, Microstructural Observations on the Terminal Penetration of Long Rod Projectile, Def. Technol., 2017, 13, p 413–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Magudeeswaran, V. Balasubramanian and G. Madhusudhan Reddy, Hydrogen Induced Cold Cracking Studies on Armour Grade High Strength, Quenched and Tempered Steel Weldments, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33, p 1897–1908.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Balakrishnan, V. Balasubramanian and G.M. Reddy, Effect of Hardfaced Interlayer Thickness and Low Hydrogen Ferritic Capping on Ballistic Performance of Shielded Metal Arc Welded Armour Steel Joints, J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 2013, 20, p 82–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Balakrishnan, V. Balasubramanian and G. Madhusudhan Reddy, Effect of Hardfacing Consumables on Ballistic Performance of Q&T Steel Joints, Def. Technol., 2013, 9, p 249–258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Balakrishnan, V. Balasubramanian and G. Madhusudhan Reddy, Effect of Joint Design on Ballistic Performance of Quenched and Tempered Steel Welded Joints, Mater. Des., 2014, 54, p 616–623.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Balakrishnan, V. Balasubramanian, G. Madhusuhan Reddy and K. Sivakumar, Effect of Buttering and Hardfacing on Ballistic Performance of Shielded Metal Arc Welded Armour Steel Joints, Mater. Des., 2011, 32, p 469–479.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. A.K. Pramanick, H. Das, G.M. Reddy, M. Ghosh, G. Das, S. Nandy and T.K. Pal, Effect of Bainitic Microstructure on Ballistic Performance of Armour Steel Weld Metal Using Developed High Ni-Coated Electrode, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2018, 27, p 2110–2123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Karhu, V. Kujanpää, K. Leino, and J. Siltanen, Laser-GMA Hybrid Welding of Direct Quenched Steel in Lap Joint Configuration—A Preliminary Study, in ICALEO 2012 - 31st International Congress on Applications of Lasers and Electro-Optics, 2012.

  22. Z. Fei, Z. Pan, D. Cuiuri, H. Li, B. Wu, D. Ding, L. Su and A.A. Gazder, Investigation into the Viability of K-TIG for Joining Armour Grade Quenched and Tempered Steel, J. Manuf. Process., 2018, 32, p 482–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Carrier, E. Markiewicz, G. Haugou, D. Lebaillif, N. Leconte and H. Naceur, Influence of the Heat Affected Zone on the Dynamic Behavior of a Welded Joint of Armoured Steel, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2017, 104, p 154–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. G. Magudeeswaran, V. Balasubramanian, G. Madhusudhan Reddy and G. Gopalakrishnan, Experimental Investigation on the Performance of Armour Grade Q&T Steel Joints Fabricated by Flux Cored Arc Welding with Low Hydrogen Ferritic Consumables, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2009, 25, p 583.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Guidelines for welding of super duplex stainless steel- arcelormittal https://industeel.arcelormittal.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Duplex-Stainless-Steels-Welding-Guidelines-EN-Juin-2019-Web.pdf

  26. W. Chuaiphana and L. Srijaroenpramong, Microstructure, Mechanical Properties and Pitting Corrosion of TIG Weld Joints Alternative Low-Cost Austenitic Stainless Steel Grade 216, Advan. Join Process., 2020, 2, p 100027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. G.M. Reddy, T. Mohandas and D.S. Sarma, Cold Cracking Studies on Low Alloy Steel Weldments: Effect of Filler Metal Composition, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2003, 8, p 407–414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. K. Maweja and W. Stumpf, The Design of Advanced Performance High Strength Low-Carbon Martensitic Armour Steels. Microstructural Considerations, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 480, p 160–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. A.K. Pramanick, H. Das, G.M. Reddy, M. Ghosh, G. Das, S. Nandy and T.K. Pal, Development and Design of Microstructure Based Coated Electrode for Ballistic Performance of Shielded Metal Arc Welded Armour Steel Joints, Mater. Des., 2016, 103, p 52–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Z. Rosenberg, R. Kositski and A. Malka-Markovitz, The Effective Strength of Metallic Plates Perforated by Rigid Projectiles, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2018, 121, p 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. G. Krauss and D.K. Matlock, Effects of Strain Hardening and Fine Structure on Strength and Toughness of Tempered Martensite in Carbon Steels, Le J. Phys. IV, 1995, 5, p C8-51.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Z. Rosenberg and E. Dekel, On the Deep Penetration and Plate Perforation by Rigid Projectiles, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2009, 46, p 4169–4180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. J. Wang and Y. Li, Microstructure Characterization in the Weld Metals of HQ130 + QJ63 High Strength Steels, Bull. Mater. Sci., 2003, 26, p 295–299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. F. Xiao, B. Liao, D. Ren, Y. Shan and K. Yang, Acicular Ferritic Microstructure of a Low-Carbon Mn-Mo-Nb Microalloyed Pipeline Steel, Mater. Charact., 2005, 54, p 305–314.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. R. Datta, D. Mukerjee and S. Mishra, Weldability and Toughness Evaluation of Pressure Vessel Quality Steel Using the Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW) Process, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 1998, 7, p 817–823.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. H. Alipooramirabad, A. Paradowska, R. Ghomashchi and M. Reid, Investigating the Effects of Welding Process on Residual Stresses, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties in HSLA Steel Welds, J. Manuf. Process., 2017, 28, p 70–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. J. Verma and R.V. Taiwade, Dissimilar Welding Behavior of 22% Cr Series Stainless Steel with 316L and Its Corrosion Resistance in Modified Aggressive Environment, J. Manuf. Process., 2016, 24, p 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. D. Shirmohammadi, M. Movahedi and M. Pouranvari, Resistance Spot Welding of Martensitic Stainless Steel: Effect of Initial Base Metal Microstructure on Weld Microstructure and Mechanical Performance, Mater Sci Eng A., 2017, 703, p 154–161.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to record sincere thanks to the Directorate of Extramural Research & Intellectual Property Rights (ERIPR), Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Ministry of Defence, Government of India, New Delhi, and Research Innovation Centre (RIC), DRDO, Chennai, for the financial support rendered through an R&D project No: EPIR/EP/RIC/2016/1/M/01/1630. The authors are grateful to the Director, Combat Vehicles Research & Development Establishment (CVRDE), DRDO, Avadi, Chennai, for providing base materials to carry out this investigation. The authors wish to thank the Director, Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory (DMRL), DRDO, Hyderabad, for granting permission to conduct the ballistic test.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Naveen Kumar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naveen Kumar, S., Balasubramanian, V., Malarvizhi, S. et al. Effect of Welding Consumables on the Ballistic Performance of Shielded Metal Arc Welded Dissimilar Armor Steel Joints. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 31, 162–179 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06219-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06219-9

Keywords

Navigation