Abstract
Bobbin tool friction stir welding is an expanded technology of friction stir welding, which has broad application prospects. In this study, an analysis of the microstructure and hardness, tensile performance, and crack growth behavior of a 12-mm-thick 5083 aluminum-alloy bobbin tool friction stir welding joint were carried out for different zones. The results show that the tensile strength of NZ can reach 95% of BM, while the tensile strength of HAZ is only 73% of BM; the elongation of NZ is 97% of BM, and the elongation of HAZ is only 47% of BM. The mechanical properties of 5083 aluminum alloy decreased after welding. For a specimen with a pre-crack vertical to the weld, when the crack propagates from the base material into the weld, the growth rate is significantly accelerated due to poor weld performance. The specimen with a pre-crack near the heat-affected zone has the fastest crack growth rate, and for the specimen with a pre-crack inside the weld nugget, the growth rate is between the other two specimens.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Z.Y. Qi, R.Z. Wu, G.J. Wang, Q. Wang, L.G. Hou. Application of Aluminum Alloy in Shipbuilding and Ocean Engineering[J]. Light Alloy Process. Technol. 2016(01)
A. Magee, L. Ladani, T.D. Topping and E.J. Lavernia, Effects of Tensile Test Parameters on the Mechanical Properties of a Bimodal Al–Mg Alloy[J], Acta Mater., 2012, 60(16), p 5838–5849.
Y.S. Ding, X.L. Wu, K.Y. Gao, C. Huang, X.Y. Xiong, H. Huang, S.P. Wen and Z.R. Nie, The Influence of Stabilization Treatment on Long-Term Corrosion Resistance and Microstructure in Er and Zr Containing 5083 Aluminum Alloy[J], Mater. Charact., 2020, 161, p 110143.
M.M. Sharma, J.D. Tomedi and T.J. Weigley, Slow Strain Rate Testing and Stress Corrosion Cracking of Ultra-Fine Grained and Conventional Al–Mg Alloy[J], Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, 619, p 35–46.
F.A. Guo, N. Trannoy and J. Lu, Characterization of the Thermal Properties by Scanning thermal Microscopy in Ultrafine-Grained Iron Surface Layer Produced by Ultrasonic Shot Peening[J], Mater. Chem. Phys., 2006, 96(1), p 59–65.
Z.Y. Ma, Research Progress of Friction Stir Welding and Processing Technology [J], Sci. Obs., 2009, 4(05), p 53–54.
C. Gürel and M. Selcuk, Recent Developments in Friction Stir Welding of Al-alloys[J], J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 23(6), p 1936–1953.
Y.H. Zhao, Y.M. Li, Y.F. Hao, Y.G. Chen and G.Q. Wang, Analysis of Microstructure and Properties of 2219 Aluminum Alloy Double-Shaft Friction Stir Welded Joints[J], Aerosp. Mater. Technol., 2012, 42(6), p 70–75.
P.L. Threadgill, M.M.Z. Ahmed, J.P. Martin, J.G. Perrett, B.P. Wynne. The Use of Bobbin Tools for Friction Stir Welding of Aluminium Alloys[J]. Mater. Sci. Forum, 2010, 884.
M.K. Sued, D. Pons, J. Lavroff and E.H. Wong, Design Features for Bobbin Friction Stir Welding Tools: Development of a Conceptual Model Linking the Underlying Physics to the Production Process[J], Mater. Des., 2014, 54, p 632–643.
Q. Wen, W.Y. Li, F.F. Wang and X.W. Yang, Research Progress of Double-Shaft Shoulder Friction Stir Welding Methods[J], Aviation Manuf. Technol., 2017, 12, p 16–23.
J. Liu, J.H. Yang, F.W. Han and W.B. Gong, Microstructure and Properties of Thick Plate Aluminum Alloy Friction Stir Welding Keyhole Repair Welding joint[J], Mater. Eng., 2012, 7, p 29–33.
H.J. Liu, J.C. Hou and H. Guo, Effect of Welding Speed on Micro-structure and Mechanical Properties of Self-Reacting Friction Stir Welding 6061–T6 Aluminum Alloy[J], Mater. Des., 2013, 50, p 872–878.
T. Sarikka, M. Ahonen, R. Mouginot, P. Nevasmaa, P.K. Roikonen, U. Ehrnstén and H. Hänninen, Microstructural, Mechanical, and Fracture Mechanical Characterization of SA 508-Alloy 182 Dissimilar Metal Weld in View of Mismatch State[J], Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 2016, 145, p 13–22.
W. Wang, K. Qiao, J.L. Wu, T.Q. Li, J. Cai and K.S. Wang, Fatigue Properties of Friction Stir Welded Joint of Ultrafine-Grained 2024 Aluminium Alloy[J], Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2017, 22(2), p 110–119.
M. Rakin, B. Medjo, N. Gubeljak and A. Sedmak, Micromechanical Assessment of Mismatch Effects on Fracture of High-Strength Low Alloyed Steel Welded Joints[J], Eng. Fract. Mech., 2013, 109, p 221–235.
M. Muzvidziwa, M. Okazaki, K. Suzuki and S. Hirano, Role of Microstructure on the Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior of a Friction Stir Welded Ti-6Al–4V[J], Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2016, 652, p 59–68.
D. Ghahremani Moghadam and K. Farhangdoost, Influence of Welding Parameters on Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Crack Growth Rate in Friction Stir Welded Nugget of 2024–T351 Aluminum Alloy Joints[J], Trans. Nonferrous Metals Soc. China, 2016, 26(10), p 2567–2585.
S.R. Sharma and R.S. Mishra, Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior of Friction Stir Processed Aluminum Alloy [J], Scripta Mater., 2008, 59(4), p 395–398.
P. Moreira, A. Jesus, A. Ribeiro and P. Castro, Fatigue Crack Growth in Friction Stir Welds of 6082–T6 and 6061–T6 Aluminium Alloys: A Comparison[J], Theoret. Appl. Fract. Mech., 2008, 50(2), p 81–91.
X.J. Wang, S.W. Li, Y. Niu, J. Zhang. Experimental Analysis of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate of A7075 Friction Stir Welding[J]. Trans. China Weld. Inst., 2008(09): 5-7+113.
L. Zhang, H.L. Zhong, S.C. Li, H.J. Zhao, J.Q. Zhao and L. Qi, Microstructure Mechanical Properties and Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior of Friction Stir Welded Joint of 6061–T6 Aluminum Alloy[J], Int. J. Fatigue, 2020, 135, p 105556.
Y.H. Jin, L. Zhang, L.L. Zhang, X.J. Wang. Micro-area low-cycle fatigue crack growth behavior of 7050 aluminum alloy FSW joint[J]. Trans. China Weld. Inst., 2020, 41(10): 11-16+97-98.
X.M. Zhang, G.Z. He and F.W. Han, Research on the Application of Friction Stir Welding Technology in the Manufacture of Aluminum Alloy Car Bodies for Railway Passenger Cars[J], Metalwork. (Cold Work.), 2016, S1, p 561–563.
K.V. Jata and S.L. Semiatin, Continuous Dynamic Recrystallization During Friction Stir Welding of High Strength Aluminum Alloys[J], Scripta Mater., 2000, 43(8), p 743–749.
Z.Y. Ma, R.S. Mishra and M.W. Mahoney, Superplastic Deformation Behaviour of Friction Stir Processed 7075Al Alloy[J], Acta Mater., 2002, 50(17), p 4419–4430.
P. Dong, Research on the Structure and Properties of 6005A–T6 Aluminum Alloy Friction Stir Welding Joint[D], Jilin University, China, 2014.
R. Karimbeav, Y.S. Pyun, E. Maleki, O. Unal and A. Amanov, An Improvement in Fatigue Behavior of AISI 4340 Steel by Shot Peening and Ultrasonic Nanocrystal Surface Modification[J], Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2020, 791, p 139752.
R.A. Donald and P.P. Pradeep, Essentials of Materials Science and Engineering[M], Defence Industry Press, Beijing, 2004, p 151
J.Z. Zhou, Y.J. Sun, S. Huang, J. Sheng, J. Li and E. Agyenim-Boateng, Effect of Laser Peening on Friction and Wear Behavior of Medical Ti6Al4V alloy[J], Opt. Laser Technol., 2019, 109, p 263–269.
A. Rotella, Y. Nadot, S. Richard, S. L’Heritier and A. Roy, Fatigue Life of Cast Al Component[J], Procedia Eng, 2015, 133, p 211–222.
G.P. Guo and C.F. Ding, Mechanical Testing of Aeronautical Materials[M], China Machine Press, Beijing, 2017, p 236
H.J. Liu, J.J. Sun, T. Jiang, S.W. Guo, Y.N. Liu and X. Lin, Research on Rolling Contact Fatigue of an Ultra-High Carbon Steel[J], Acta Metall Sinica, 2014, 50(12), p 1446–1452.
M. Achintha, D. Nowell, D. Fufari, E.E. Sackett and M.R. Bache, Fatigue Behaviour of Geometric Features Subjected to Laser Shock Peening: Experiments and Modelling[J], Int. J. Fatigue, 2014, 62, p 171–179.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775355].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, B., Wang, L., Hui, L. et al. Analysis of Multi-zone Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior of Friction Stir Welded 5083 Aluminum Alloy. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 31, 53–63 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06191-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06191-4