Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of the Stress–Strain Behavior of Open-Cell Aluminum Foam under Compressive Loading and the Effects of Various RVE Boundary Conditions

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prediction of the mechanical behavior of metallic foams with realistic microstructure and the effects of various boundary conditions on the mechanical behavior is an important and challenging issue in modeling representative volume elements (RVEs). A numerical investigation is conducted to determine the effects of various boundary conditions and cell wall cross sections on the compressive mechanical properties of aluminum foam, including the stiffness, plateau stress and onset strain of densification. The open-cell AA6101-T6 aluminum foam Duocel is used in the analyses in this study. Geometrical characteristics including the cell size, foam relative density, and cross-sectional shape and thickness of the cell walls are extracted from images of the foam. Then, the obtained foam microstructure is analyzed as a 2D model. The ligaments are modeled as shear deformable beams with elastic-plastic material behavior. To prevent interpenetration of the nodes and walls inside the cells with large deformations, self-contact-type frictionless interaction is stipulated between the internal surfaces. Sensitivity analyses are performed using several boundary conditions and cells wall cross-sectional shapes. The predicted results from the finite element analyses are compared with the experimental results. Finally, the most appropriate boundary conditions, leading to more consistent results with the experimental data, are introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Tekoglu and P.R. Onck, Size Effects in the Mechanical Behaviour of Cellular Materials, J. Mater. Sci., 2005, 40, p 5911–5917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M.F. Ashby, A.G. Evans, N.A. Fleck, and L.J. Gibson, Metal Foams: A Design Guide, 1st ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. Sridhar and N.A. Fleck, The Multiaxial Yield Behavior of an Aluminium Alloy Foam, J. Mater. Sci., 2005, 40, p 4005–4008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Reyes, O.S. Hopperstad, A.G. Hanssen, and M. Langseth, Modelling of Material Failure in Foam-Based Components, Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2004, 30, p 805–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Maheo, Elastic Behaviour of Multi-Scale, Open-Cell Foams, Compos. Part B, 2013, 44, p 172–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Degischer and B. Kriszt, Handbook of Cellular Metals: Production, Processing, Application, Wiley, New York, 2002

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Gibson and F. Ashby, Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd ed., Oxford shire press, Oxford, 1997

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. V.S. Deshpande and N.A. Fleck, Isotropic Constitutive Models for Metallic Foams, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2000, 48, p 1253–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P.R. Onck, Application of A Continuum Constitutive Model to Metallic Foam DEN-Specimens in Compression, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2001, 43, p 2947–2959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Kim and S. Kang, Development of Experimental Method to Characterize Pressure-Dependent Yield Criteria for Polymeric Foams, Polym. Test, 2003, 22, p 197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Ghayour, H. Hosseini-Toudeshky, M. Jalalvand, and E.J. Barbero, Micro/Macro Approach for Prediction of Matrix Cracking Evolution in Laminated Composites, J. Compos. Mater., 2015, 50, p 2647–2659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Sadeghi, H. Hosseini-Toudeshky, and B. Mohammadi, In-Plane Progressive Matrix Cracking Analysis of Symmetric Cross-Ply Laminates With Holes, Fatigue. Fract. Eng. M, 2014, 37, p 290–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Hosseini-Toudeshky, A. Farrokhabadi, and B. Mohammadi, Implementation of a Micro-Meso Approach for Progressive Damage Analysis of Composite Laminates, Struct. Eng. Mech., 2012, 43, p 657–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R.M. Christensen, Mechanics of Low Density Materials, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1986, 34, p 563–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J.L. Grenestedt, Influence of Wavy Imperfections in Cell Walls on Elastic Stiffness of Cellular Solids, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1998, 46, p 29–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. W.E. Warren and A.M. Kraynik, Foam Mechanics: The Linear Elastic Response of Two-Dimensional Spatially Periodic Cellular Materials, Mech. Mater., 1987, 6, p 27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. W.E. Warren and A.M. Kraynik, The Linear Elastic Properties of Open-Cell Foams, J. Appl. Mech., 1988, 55, p 341–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. W.E. Warren, A.M. Kraynik, and C.M. Stone, A Constitutive Model For Two-Dimensional Nonlinear Elastic Foams, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1989, 37, p 717–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Wang and A.M. Cuitino, Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Open-Cell Foams With Large Deformations, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2000, 48, p 961–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Harders, K. Hupfer, and J. Rosler, Influence of Cell Wall Shape And Density on the Mechanical Behaviour of 2D Foam Structures, Acta Mater., 2005, 53, p 1335–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. H.S. Kim and S.T.S. Al-Hassani, A Morphological Elastic Model of General Hexagonal Columnar Structures, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2001, 43, p 1027–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. H.S. Kim and S.T.S. Al-Hassani, The Effect of Doubly Tapered Strut Morphology on the Plastic Yield Surface of Cellular Materials, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2002, 44, p 1559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Avalle, G. Belingardi, and A. Ibba, Mechanical Models of Cellular Solids: Parameters Identification from Experimental Tests, Int. J. Impact. Eng., 2007, 34, p 3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. Miedzinska, T. Niezgoda, and R. Gieleta, Numerical and Experimental Aluminium Foam Microstructure Testing With the Use of Computed Tomography, Comp. Mater. Sci., 2012, 64, p 90–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. “International Standard” Iso13314, Mechanical Testing Of Metals-Ductility Testing-Compression Test for Porous and Cellular Metals, 1st ed, 2011

  26. H. Kanahashi, T. Mukai, T.G. Nieh, T. Aizawa, and K. Higashi, Effect of Cell Size on the Dynamic Compressive Properties of Open-Celled Aluminum Foams, Mater. Trans., 2002, 10, p 2548–2553

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Ali Farsi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamidi Ghaleh Jigh, B., Farsi, M.A. & Hosseini Toudeshky, H. Prediction of the Stress–Strain Behavior of Open-Cell Aluminum Foam under Compressive Loading and the Effects of Various RVE Boundary Conditions. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 27, 2576–2585 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3329-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3329-3

Keywords

Navigation