Advertisement

Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 1890–1897 | Cite as

Characterization of Micro-arc Oxidation Coatings on 6N01 Aluminum Alloy Under Different Electrolyte Temperature Control Modes

  • Xuefei Wang
  • Zongtao Zhu
  • Yuanxing Li
  • Hui Chen
Article
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

The micro-arc oxidation coatings of 6N01 aluminum alloy produced under different control modes of the electrolyte temperature are discussed in detail. Compared to those coated by a thermostatically controlled treatment, the coatings had different surface characterizations when they were coated without controlling the electrolyte temperature, particularly after treatment involving boiling electrolytes. Scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy were used to observe the morphology of the coatings. Energy-dispersive spectrometry and x-ray diffractometer were used to characterize their elemental and crystalline phase compositions. The results indicate that the treatment without a controlled electrolyte temperature ultimately led to a thicker and rougher film with a respectably thick inner barrier film, a lower content of γ-Al2O3 and better corrosion resistance.

Keywords

6N01 aluminum alloy boiling electrolyte electrolyte temperature micro-arc oxidation surface characterization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51405398 and 51505392) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Liu, J. Wu, W. Xue et al., Discharge Behaviors During Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation on Aluminum Alloy, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2014, 148, p 284–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Fazel, H.R. Salimijazi, M.A. Golozar, and M.R.G. Jazi, A Comparison of Corrosion, Tribocorrosion and Electrochemical Impedance Properties of Pure Ti and Ti6Al4 V Alloy Treated by Micro-arc Oxidation Process, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 324, p 751–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    X. Yu, L. Chen, H. Qin, M. Wu, and Z. Yan, Formation Process of In Situ Oxide Coatings with High Porosity Using One-Step Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2016, 366, p 432–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Pezzato, K. Brunelli, E. Napolitani, M. Magrini, and M. Dabala, Surface Properties of AZ91 Magnesium Alloy After PEO Treatment Using Molybdate Salts and Low Current Densities, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 357, p 1031–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.M.S. Al Bosta and K. Ma, Influence of Electrolyte Temperature on Properties and Infrared Emissivity of MAO Ceramic Coating on 6061 Aluminum Alloy, Infrared Phys. Technol., 2014, 67, p 63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Raj and M. MubarakAli, Formation of Ceramic Alumina Nanocomposite Coatings on Aluminium for Enhanced Corrosion Resistance, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2009, 209, p 5341–5352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Jun-Hua, W. Jin, L. Yan, D. Mao-Hua, and H. Fu-Zhu, Effects of Single Pulse Energy on the Properties of Ceramic Coating Prepared by Micro-arc Oxidation on Ti Alloy, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 324, p 405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P.B. Srinivasan, J. Liang, C. Blawert, M. Stoermer, and W. Dietzel, Effect of Current Density on the Microstructure and Corrosion Behaviour of Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation Treated AM50 Magnesium Alloy, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2009, 255, p 4212–4218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Stojadinovic, N. Tadic, N. Radic, P. Stefanov, B. Grbic, and R. Vasilic, Anodic Luminescence, Structural, Photoluminescent, and Photocatalytic Properties of Anodic Oxide Films Grown on Niobium in Phosphoric Acid, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 355, p 912–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Z. Zhu, Y. Li, X. Wang, and H. Chen, Surface Treatment to Reduce and Redistribute Residual-Stresses in A7N01 Weld by Micro-arc Oxidation, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2016, 231, p 248–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.A. Curran and T.W. Clyne, Porosity in Plasma Electrolytic Oxide Coatings, Acta Mater., 2006, 54, p 1985–1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. Dehnavi, B.L. Luan, X.Y. Liu, D.W. Shoesmith, and S. Rohani, Correlation Between Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation Treatment Stages and Coating Microstructure on Aluminum Under Unipolar Pulsed DC Mode, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2015, 269, p 91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Alsrayheen, B. Campbell, E. McLeod, R. Rateick, and V. Birss, Exploring the Effect of Alkaline Silicate Solution Composition on the ac/dc Spark Anodization of Al-Cu Alloys, Electrochim. Acta, 2012, 60, p 102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. Dehnavi, B.L. Luan, D.W. Shoesmith, X.Y. Liu, and S. Rohani, Effect of Duty Cycle and Applied Current Frequency on Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO) Coating Growth Behavior, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2013, 226, p 100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R.H.U. Khan, A. Yerokhin, X. Li, H. Dong, and A. Matthews, Surface Characterisation of DC Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation Treated 6082 Aluminium Alloy: Effect of Current Density and Electrolyte Concentration, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2010, 205, p 1679–1688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Bahramian, K. Raeissi, and A. Hakimizad, An investigation of the Characteristics of Al2O3/TiO2 PEO Nanocomposite Coating, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 351, p 13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xuefei Wang
    • 1
  • Zongtao Zhu
    • 1
  • Yuanxing Li
    • 1
  • Hui Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations