Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Shot Peening on the Intergranular Corrosion Susceptibility of a Novel Super304H Austenitic Stainless Steel

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The surface phase constituent of Super304H austenitic stainless steel, after shot peening and sensitization treatment at 600, 650, and 700 °C for 2 h, was characterized using x-ray diffraction method. The degree of sensitization (DOS) was investigated by means of double-loop electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation (DL-EPR) test, and the morphology after DL-EPR test was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results showed that nano-sized grains and strain-induced martensite together with compressive residual stress formed on the surface of Super304H steel after shot peening. Surface compressive residual stresses relaxed greatly after being sensitized at 600-700 °C for 2 h, and no systematic correlation was observed between the compressive residual stresses developed and the intergranular corrosion susceptibility (IGCS). Because of the occurrence of strain-induced martensite in the shot-peened specimens, their IGCS is much higher than that of the as-received specimen when being sensitized at 600-650 °C for 2 h. Besides, the DOS increased with the increasing of shot peening time and the content of strain-induced martensite. On the contrary, the IGCS of Super304H stainless steels subjected to shot peening was eliminated when being sensitized at 700 °C for 2 h because of the reverse transformation of strain-induced martensite and faster diffusion rate of Cr at higher temperature in ultrafine-grained austenite which had helped healing the chromium depletion zone in a very short time. In a word, shot peening promoted desensitization of Super304H steel in a time shorter than 2 h at higher temperature up to 700 °C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Ou, H. Xing, X.L. Wang, and J. Sun, Tensile Yield Behavior and Precipitation Strengthening Mechanism in Super304H Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A., 2014, 600(10), p 171–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Gao, C.L. Zhang, and X.H. Xiong, Intergranular Corrosion Susceptibility of a Novel Super304H Stainless Steel, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2012, 24(9), p 26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C.L. Zhang, X.H. Xiong, S.B. Ping, and Y. Gao, Influence of Chemical Composition on the Intergranular Corrosion Susceptibility of Super304H Austenitic Heat-Resistant Steel, Corros. Eng. Sci. Techn., 2014, 49(7), p 624–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Jiang and L. Zhu, Strengthening Mechanisms of Precipitates in S30432 Heat-Resistant Steel During Short-Term Aging, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 53(9), p 170–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. F.Q. Guo, S.C. Cheng, and Z.D. Liu, Effect of Carbon and Niobium on Intergranular Corrosion of ASME S30432 Austenitic Heat Resistant Steel, Mater. Mech. Eng., 2007, 31(8), p 11–14

    Google Scholar 

  6. E.A. Trillo, R. Beltran, J.G. Maldonado, R.J. Romero, and L.E. Murr, Combined Effects of Deformation (Strain and Strain State), Grain Size and Carbon Content on Carbide Precipitation and Corrosion Sensitisation in 304 Stainless Steel, Mater. Charact., 1995, 35, p 99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R.V. Taiwade, Effect of Grain Size on Degree of Sensitization of Chrome-Manganese Stainless Steel, ISIJ Int., 2013, 32, p 2206–2212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C.L. Briant and A.M. Ritter, The Effects of Deformation Induced Martensite on the Sensitization of Austenitic Stainless Steels, Metall. Trans. A, 1980, 11(12), p 1980–2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D.N. Wasnik, V. Kain, and I. Samajdar, Resistance to Sensitisation and Intergranular Corrosion Through Extreme Randomisation of Grain Boundaries, Acta Mater., 2002, 34(50), p 4587–4601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Shimada, H. Kokawa, and Z.J. Wang, Optimization of Grain Boundary Character Distribution for Intergranular Corrosion Resistant 304 Stainless Steel by Twin-Induced Grain Boundary Engineering, Acta Mater., 2002, 50(9), p 2331–2341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. X. Peng, J. Yan, and Y. Zhou, Effect of Grain Refinement on the Resistance of 304 Stainless Steel to Breakaway Oxidation in Wet Air, Acta Mater., 2005, 53, p 5079–5088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y.K. Zhang, J.Z. Lu, and K.Y. Luo, Stress Corrosion Cracking Resistance of AISI, 304 SS Subjected to Laser Shock Processing, Mater. Sci., 2013, 179, p 137–152

    Google Scholar 

  13. S.X. Li, Y.N. He, and S.R. Yu, Evaluation of the Effect of Grain Size on Chromium Carbide Precipitation and Intergranular Corrosion of 316L Stainless Steel, Corros. Sci., 2013, 66(3), p 211–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A.T. Krawczynska, M. Gloc, and K. Lublinska, Intergranular Corrosion Resistance of Nanostructured Austenitic Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Sci., 2013, 48, p 4517–4523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Lale and Farzad Kargar, Suppression of Chromium Depletion and Sensitization in Austenitic Stainless Steel by Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment, Mater. Lett., 2011, 65, p 1935–1937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M.J. Povich, Low Temperature Sensitization of Type 304 SS, Corrosion., 1978, 34(2), p 60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. V. Kain, K. Chandra, K.N. Adhe, and P.K. De, Effect of Cold Work on Low-Temperature Sensitization Behaviour of Austenitic Stainless Steels, J. Nucl. Mater., 2004, 33(4), p 115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. H. Th, D.E. Keijser, J.I. Langford, E.J. Mittemeijer, and B.P. Vogels, Use of the Voigt Function in a Single-Line Method for the Analysis of X-ray Diffraction Line Broadening, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 1982, 15(6), p 308–314

    Google Scholar 

  19. A.K. De, D.C. Murdock, and M.C. Mataya, Quantitative Measurement of Deformation-Induced Martensite in 304 Stainless Steel by X-ray Diffraction, Scr. Mater., 2004, 43(50), p 1445–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Verifying the Alignment of X-ray Diffraction Instrumentation for Residual Stress Measurement, E915-10, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, West Conshohocken, 2010, p 1–4.

  21. J.L. Lv and H.Y. Luo, Influence of Tensile Pre-strain and Sensitization on Passive Films in AISI, 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2012, 135(2–3), p 973–978

    Google Scholar 

  22. I. Shakhova, V. Dudko, and A. Belyakov, Effect of Large Strain Cold Rolling and Subsequent Annealing on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of an Austenitic Stainless Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 54(5), p 176–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S.J. Lee, Y.M. Park, and Y.K. Lee, Reverse Transformation Mechanism of Martensite to Austeniten a Metastable Austenitic Alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, 515, p 32–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Zhang, X.T. Jing, and B.Z. Lou, Mechanism and reversible behavior of the α′ → γ Transformation in 1Cr18Ni9Ti Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Sci., 1999, 34, p 3291–3296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J.L. Lv and H.Y. Luo, Influence of Tensile Pre-strain and Sensitization on Martensite Reversion Mechanism in Austenitic Stainless Steel, Mater. Charact., 2013, 77, p 10–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. R. Singh and K. Ravikumar, The Effects of Cold Working on Sensitization and Intergranular Corrosion Behavior of AISI, 304 austenitic stainless steel, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2003, 34(13), p 2441–2447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. H.H. Yu, H.Y. Luo, and J.L. Lv, Effects of Pre-deformation on Electrochemical Behavior of AISI304 Stainless Steel, Procedia Eng., 2012, 27(20), p 1626–1634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. K. Zhan, X.Y. Wu, C.H. Jiang, and V. Ji, Thermal Relaxation Behavior of Residual Stress and Microstructure in Shot Peened S30432 Steel at Elevated Temperatures, Mater. Trans., 2012, 53(6), p 1195–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. C. Stawstrom and M. Hillert, An Improved Depleted-Zone Theory of Intergranular Corrosion of 18-8 Stainless Steel, J. Iron Steel Inst., 1969, 207, p 77–85

    Google Scholar 

  30. P.S. Chowdhury, S.K. Guchhait, and P.K. Mitra, Understanding the Effect of Uniaxial Tensile Strain on the Early Stages of Sensitization in AISI, 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2015, 155(15), p 217–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. P.I. Williams and R.G. Faulkner, Chemical Volume Diffusion Coefficients for Stainless Steel Corrosion Studies, J. Mater. Sci., 1987, 22(10), p 3537–3542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Z. Fang, Y.S. Hu, and L. Zhang, Effect of Deformation Induced Martensite on Electrochemical Behaviors of Type 304 Stainless Steel in the Active State, Corros. Sci. Prot. Technol., 1997, 1(2), p 75–78

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would acknowledge greatly the financial support from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (51471072) and Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Storage Materials of Guangdong Province.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Gao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, R.K., Zheng, Z.J. & Gao, Y. Effect of Shot Peening on the Intergranular Corrosion Susceptibility of a Novel Super304H Austenitic Stainless Steel. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 25, 20–28 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-015-1806-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-015-1806-5

Keywords

Navigation