Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 345–352 | Cite as

Hemocompatibility Improvement of Chromium-Bearing Bare-Metal Stent Platform After Magnetoelectropolishing

  • Ryszard RokickiEmail author
  • Waseem Haider
  • Shivani Kaushal Maffi


Research was undertaken to determine the influence of the increased content of chromium in the outermost passive layer of magneto-electrochemically refined Co-Cr alloy L-605 surface on its hemocompatibility. The chemistry, roughness, surface energy, and wettability of conventionally electropolished (EP) and magnetoelectropolished (MEP) samples were studied with x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), open circuit potential, atomic force microscopy, and contact angle meter. In vitro hemocompatibility of tested material surfaces was assessed using two important indicators of vascular responses to biomaterial, namely endothelialization and platelets adhesion. The endothelialization was assessed by seeding and incubating samples with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) for 3 days before counting and observing them under a fluorescent microscope. The platelet (rich plasma blood) adhesion and activation test on EP and MEP L-605 alloy surfaces was assessed using a laser scanning confocal microscope. The XPS analysis of MEP samples showed significant enrichment of the passive layer with Cr and O when compared with the EP one. The amount of other elements in the passive layer did not show a significant difference between EP and MEP treatments. The adhesion of HUVEC cells shows remarkable affinity to surfaces enriched in Cr (MEP) with almost 100% confluency. In addition, the number of platelets that adhered to standard EP surfaces was higher compared to the MEP surface. The present study shows that the chromium-enriched surface of cobalt-chromium alloy L-605 by the magnetoelectropolishing process tremendously improves surface hemocompatibility with regard to stent functionality by enhanced endothelialization and lower platelet adhesion and should be taken under consideration as an alternative surface of biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents, polymer-free drug-eluting stents as well as bare-metal stents.


biomaterial magnetic magnets oxidation stainless steel 



Fort Wayne Metals Research Products Corporation is gratefully acknowledged for providing Co-Cr alloy L-605 sample for the studies. We also are thankful to Mrs. Chandan Pulletikurthi from Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA for growing HUVEC cell cultures. Dr. Waseem Haider would also like to thank the US Army Research Office (W911NF-14-1-0100) for their support.


  1. 1.
    B. Zuckerman, The Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) Trial: An FDA Perspective,
  2. 2.
    R. Waksman, Drug-Eluting Stents: Will the Transformation to Bioabsorption Make Durable Polymers Obsolete, Cardiovasc. Revasc. Med., 2013, 14, p 69–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Wood, Cordis Quits Coronary Stent Business, Dropping Cypher, Nevo DES. June 15, 2011 HeartWire,
  4. 4.
    E.H. Christiansen, L.O. Jensen, P. Thayssen, H.H. Tilsted, L.R. Krusell, K.N. Hansen et al., Biolimus-Eluting Biodegradable Polymer-Coated Stent Versus Durable Polymer Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Unselected Patients Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (SORT OUT V): A Randomised Non-inferiority Trial, Lancet, 2013, 381, p 661. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61962-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P.C. Smits, S. Hofma, M. Togni, N. Vazquez, M. Valdes, V. Voudris et al., Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent (COMPARE II): A Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial. Lancet, 2013, 381, p 651. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61852-2 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Tada, R.A. Byrne, T. Schuster, R. Cuni, H. Kitabata, K. Tiroch et al., Early Vascular Healing with Rapid Breakdown Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography, Cardiovasc Revasc Med, 2013, 14, p 84–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L.V. Poperenko, M.F. Maitz, and M.V. Vinnichenko, Blood Compatibility Study of Chromium Oxide Films Deposited on Stainless Steel Surfaces by Magnetron Sputtering, Funct. Mater., 2003, 10(3), p 447–452Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Rokicki, Apparatus and Method for Enhancing Electropolishing Using Magnetic Field. US Patent 7632390.
  9. 9.
    T. Hryniewicz, K. Rokosz, and R. Rokicki, Electrochemical and XPS Studies of 316L Stainless Steel After Electropolishing in Magnetic Field, Corros. Sci., 2008, 50(9), p 2676–2681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Waksman, Will Biodegradable Polymers Replace Durable Polymers of the DES Technology,
  11. 11.
    S. Wood, Stent Pioneer Julio Palmaz Urges DES Makers to “Learn from Mistakes of the Past.(heart/wire)Interventional/Surgery October 27, 2009,
  12. 12.
    B. O’Brien and W. Carroll, The Evolution of Cardiovascular Stent Material and Surfaces in Response to Clinical Drivers: A Review, Acta Biomater., 2009, 5, p 945–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Raber, H. Kelbaek, M. Ostoijc, A. Baumbach, D. Heg, D. Tuller et al., Effect of Biolimus-Eluting Stents wit Biodegradable Polymers vs Bare-Metal Stents on Cardiovascular Events Among Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction, The COMFORTABLE AMI, Randomized Trial. JAMA., 2012, 308(8), p 777–787. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.10065 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    I. De Scheerder, J. Sohier, K. Wang, E. Verbeken, X. Zhou, and L.E.T.A.L. Froyen, Metallic Surface Treatment Using Electrochemical Polishing Decreases Thrombogenicity and Neointimal Hyperplasia of Coronary Stents, J. Interven. Cardiol., 2000, 13(3), p 179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    I. De Scheerder, J. Sohier, E. Verbeken, L. Froyen, and J. Van Humbeeck, Biocompatibility of Coronary Stent Material: Effect of Electrochemical Polishing, Mat.-wiss.u. Werkstofftech., 2001, 32, p 142–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S.M. Slack, T.A. Horbett, The Vroman Effect, A Critical Review. Protein at Interfaces II, Book Chapter 8, p 112–128, ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 602Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    W. Norde and J. Lyklema, Protein Adsorption and Bacterial Adhesion to Solid Surfaces: A Physiochemical Approach, Colloids Surf., 1989, 38, p 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Toscano and M. Santore, Fibrinogen Adsorption on Three Silica-Based Surfaces: Conformation and Kinetics, Langmuir, 2006, 22, p 2588–2597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. van Beusekom, P. Serruys, and W. van der Glessen, Coronary Stent Coatings, Coron. Artery Dis., 1994, 5, p 590–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    L. Lambrech, B. Young, and R. Stafford, The Influence of Preadsorbed Canine von Willebrand Factor, Fibrinonectin and Fibrinogen on Ex Vivo Artificial Surface-Induced Thrombosis, Thromb. Res., 1986, 41, p 99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    P. Barnabeu and A. Caprani, Influence of Surface-Charge on Adsorption of Fibrinogen and or Albumin on Rotating Disc Electrode of Platinum and Carbon, Biomaterials, 1990, 11, p 258–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Boilar, Ed., The Chemistry of Coordination Compounds, Reinhold Pbl, New York, 1966, p 448–471Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    T. Yoshioka, K. Tsuru, S. Hayakawa, and A. Osaka, Preparation of Alginic Acid Layers on Stainless-Steel Substrates for Biomedical Applications, Biomaterials, 2003, 24(17), p 2889–2894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Lestellius, B. Liedberg, and P. Tengvall, In Vitro Plasma Protein Adsorption on ω-Functionalized Alkanethiolate Self-Assembled Monolayers, Langmuir, 1997, 13(22), p 5900–5908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. Lin and W. Chuang, Synthesis, Surface Characterization, and Platelet Reactivity Evaluation for the Self-Assembled Monolayer of Alkanethiol with Sulfonic Acid Functionality, J. Biomed. Master Res., 2000, 51(3), p 413–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    I.H. Bae, I.K. Park, D.S. Park, H. Lee, and M.H. Jeong, Thromboresistant and Endothelialization Effects of Dopamine-Mediated Heparin Coating on a Stent Material Surface, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 2012, 23, p 1259–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Y. Weng, J. Chen, Q. Tu, Q. Li, M. Maitz, and N. Huang, Biomimetic Modification of Metallic Cardiovascular Biomaterials: From Function Mimicking to Endothelialization In Vivo, Interface Focus, 2012, 2, p 356–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Martins, B. Ratner, and M. Barbosa, Protein Adsorption on Mixtures of Hydroxyl and Methyl-Terminated Alkanethiols Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold Electrodes Studied by Chronopotentiometry, Biomaterials, 2003, 24, p 3697–3706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    B. Siravaman and R. Latour, The Adherence of Platelets to Adsorbed Albumin by Receptor-Mediated Recognition of Binding Sites Exposed by Adsorption-Induced Unfolding, Biomaterials, 2010, 31(6), p 1036–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryszard Rokicki
    • 1
    Email author
  • Waseem Haider
    • 2
  • Shivani Kaushal Maffi
    • 3
  1. 1.ElectrobrightMacungieUSA
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Texas-Pan AmericanEdinburgUSA
  3. 3.Department of Molecular MedicineUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio and Edinburg Regional Academic Health CenterEdinburgUSA

Personalised recommendations