Advertisement

A Probabilistic Approach to Examine the Effect of Chemistry Variations on Distortion During Industrial Gas Carburizing

  • Satyam S. Sahay
  • Vinayak Deshmukh
  • Mohamad El-Zein
Article

Abstract

Industrial carburizing operations have been traditionally simulated for several decades by solving the diffusion equation. However, using this deterministic approach, it is difficult to capture batch-to-batch variations in the properties attributed to process and chemistry variations. In the current study, a probabilistic approach is used to capture the variations in process parameters and alloy chemistry. The advantage of this approach is illustrated through a case study on reduction in distortion variations as well as its absolute value during the carburizing operation. Finally, some of the opportunities and challenges in the carburizing simulation are discussed.

Keywords

modeling processes heat treating automotive 

References

  1. 1.
    S.S. Sahay, Modeling of Industrial Heat Treatment Operations, CRC Handbook on “Thermal Process Modelling of Steels”, C. Hakan Gur, Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2009, p 313–339Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C.A. Stickels, Analytical Models for the Gas Carburizing Process, Met. Trans. B, 1989, 20B, p 535–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. Karabelchtchikova and R.D. Sisson, Carbon Diffusion in Steels: A Numerical Analysis Based on Direct Integration of the Flux, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 2006, 27, p 598–604Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O.K. Rowan and R.D. Sisson, Effect of Alloy Composition on Carburizing Performance of Steel, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 2009, 30(3), p 235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.S. Sahay and K. Mitra, Cost Model-Based Optimization of Carburizing Operation, Surf. Eng., 2004, 20, p 379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Reti, Residual Stresses in Carburized, Carbonitrided, and Case-Hardened Components, Handbook of Residual Stress and Deformation of Steel, G. Totten, M. Howes, and T. Inoue, Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, 2002, p 189–208Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Z. Li, L. Ferguson, X. Sun, and P. Bauerle, Experiment and Simulation of Heat Treatment Results of C-Ring Test Specimen, Proceedings of the 23rd ASM Heat Treating Society Conference, September 25–28, 2005, p 245–252Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Deshmukh, S.S. Sahay, G. Deshmukh, E.M. Johnson, and M. El-Zein, Simulation and Optimization of Distortion in the Carburized Components, Proceedings of ASM M&MT Conference, Mumbai, 2011, p 1–4Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.S. Sahay, A Probabilistic Modeling Approach for Industrial Carburizing Operation, Proceedings of the 24th ASM Heat Treating Society Conference, September 17–19, 2007, p 261–264Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.M. Tartaglia and G.T. Eldis, Core Hardenability Calculations for Carburizing Steels, Metall. Trans. A, 1984, 15A, p 1173–1183Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Goldak, J. Zhou, S. Tchernov, and D. Downey, Validation of VrHeatTreat Software for Heat Treatment and Carburization, Goldak Technologies Inc., Ottawa, 2007Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.F. Watt, L. Coon, M. Bibby, J. Goldak, and C. Henwood, An algorithm for Modeling Microstructural Development in Weld Heat-Affected Zones (Part A) Reaction Kinetics, Acta Metall., 1988, 36(11), p 3029–3035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M.F. Ashby and K.E. Easterling, A First Report on Diagrams for Grain Growth in Welds, Acta Metall., 1982, 30(11), p 1969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.S. Kirkaldy and D. Venugopalan, Phase Transformations in Ferrous Alloys, American Institute of Mining Engineers, Philadelphia, PA, 1984, p 125–148Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K.W. Andrews, Hardenability of Steels, J. Iron Steel Inst., 1965, 7, p 721–727Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.S. Kirkaldy and R.C. Sharma, A New Phenomenology for Steel IT and CCT Curves, Scr. Metall., 1982, 16(10), p 1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.S. Kirkaldy, Prediction of Alloy Hardenability from Thermodynamic and Kinetic Data, Metall. Mater. Trans., 1973, 4, p 2327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.C. Simo, Numerical Analysis of Classical Plasticity, Handbook for Numerical Analysis, Vol. IV, P.G. Ciarlet and J.J. Lions, Ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1998Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    W.T. Cook, P.F. Morris, and L. Woollard, Calculated Hardenability for Improved Consistency of Properties in Heat Treatable Engineering Steels, J. Mater. Eng. Process., 1997, 6, p 443–448Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Cristinacce, Distortion in Case Carburized Components—The Steel Makers View, Heat Treating, Proc of the 18th Conference, R.A. Wallis and H.W. Walton, Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, 1999, p 5–11Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S.S. Sahay and M. El-Zein, Technology Vision: Residual Stress Engineering for Leaner, Greener and Safer Design, Surf. Eng., 2011, 27, p 77–79Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A.P. Zhigun, G.P. Guslyakova, A.B. El’kin, and L.D. Sokolov, Fatigue Strength of Straightened Machine Parts, Met. Sci. Heat Treat., 1980, 22(4), p 256–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    C.A. Stickels, Gas Carburizing, ASM Handbook, Vol. 4, Heat Treating, ASM International, Materials Park, 1991, p 322Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Satyam S. Sahay
    • 1
  • Vinayak Deshmukh
    • 1
  • Mohamad El-Zein
    • 2
  1. 1.John Deere Asia Technology Innovation CenterJohn Deere India Pvt LimitedMagarpatta City, PuneIndia
  2. 2.Moline Technology Innovation CenterMolineUSA

Personalised recommendations