Advertisement

Influence of Steel Grade on Surface Cooling Rates and Heat Flux during Quenching

  • T. S. Prasanna Kumar
Article

Abstract

Immersion quenching is one of the most widely used processes for achieving martensitic and bainitic steels. The efficiency and quality of quenching are generally tested using standard quench probes for obtaining the cooling curves. A host of parameters like quenchant type, steel grade, bath agitation, section thickness, etc., affect the cooling curves. Cooling curve analyses covered under ASTM standards cannot be used to assess the performance of a quenchant for different grades of steel, as they use a common material for the probe. This article reports the development of equipment, which, in conjunction with mathematical models, can be used for obtaining cooling curves for a specific steel/quenchant combination. The mathematical models couple nonlinear transient inverse heat transfer with phase transformation, resulting in cooling curves specific to the steel grade-quenchant combination. The austenite decomposition models were based on an approach consistent with both the TTT diagram of the steel and Fe-C equilibrium phase diagrams. The TTT diagrams for the specific chemistry of the specimens and the thermophysical properties of the individual phases as functions of temperature were obtained using JMatPro software. Experiments were conducted in the laboratory for computing surface temperature and heat flux at the mid-section of a 25-mm diameter by 100-mm-long cylindrical specimen of two types of steels in two different quenchants. A low alloy steel (EN19) and a plain carbon steel (C45) were used for bringing out the influence of austenite transformation on surface cooling rates and heat flux. Two types of industrial quenchants (i) a mineral oil, and (ii) an aqueous solution of polymer were used. The results showed that the cooling curves, cooling rate curves, and the surface heat flux depended on the steel grade with the quenchant remaining the same.

Keywords

carbon/alloy steels heat flux heat treating inverse modeling modeling processes quenching surface cooling curves 

Nomenclature

c

Specific heat (J/kg·K)

k

Thermal conductivity (W/m·K)

L

Latent heat (J/kg)

p

No. of future time steps (-)

q

Heat flux (W/m2)

\(\dot{q}\)

Rate of latent heat release (W/m3)

r

Radial coordinate (m)

s

No. of thermocouples (-)

S

Objective function (K2)

T

Temperature (K)

t

Time (s)

X

Fraction austenite transformed (-)

Y

Temperature (K)

z

Axial coordinate (m)

[C]

Capacitance matrix

{F}

Force vector

[K]

Stiffness matrix

δ

Flux increment fraction (-)

ɛ

Error of convergence (-)

ρ

Density (kg/m3)

ψ

Hardness (HRC)

θ

Parameter (-)

References

  1. 1.
    G.E. Totten, C.E. Bates, and N.A. Clinton, Ed., Handbook of Quenchants and Quenching Technology, American Society of Metals, Materials Park, OH, 1993Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASTM Designation D6200-01Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.P. de Oliviera, M.A. Savi, P.M.C.L. Pacheco, and L.F.G. de Souza, Thermomechanical Analysis of Steel Cylinders Quenching Using a Constitutive Model with Diffusional and Non-diffusional Phase Transformations, Mech. Mater., 2010, 42, p 31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Simsir and C. Hakan Gur, Simulation of Quenching, Handbook of Thermal Processing of Steels, C. Hakan Gur and J. Pan, Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2008, p 341–425 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Li, G. Zhao, S. Niu, and C. Huang, FEM Simulation of Quenching Process and Experimental Verification of Simulation Results, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2007, 452–453, p 705–714Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Li, G. Zhao, and L. He, Finite Element Method Based Simulation of Stress-Strain Field in the Quenching Process, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 15, p 276–290Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.H. Kang and Y.T. Im, Thermo-Elasto-Plastic Finite Element Analysis of Quenching Process of Carbon Steel, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2007, 192–193, p 381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Eshraghi Kakhki, A. Kermanpur, and M.A. Golozar, Numerical Simulation of Continuous Cooling of a Low Alloy Steel to Predict Microstructure and Hardness, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2009, 17, p 1–21Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Carlone, G.S. Palazzo, and R. Pasquino, Finite Element Analysis of the Steel Quenching Process: Temperature Field and Solid-Phase Change, Comput. Math. Appl., 2010, 59, p 585–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Zehtab Yazdi, S.A. Sajjadi, S.M. Zebarjad, and Moosavi. Nezhad, Prediction of Hardness at Different Points of Jominy Specimen Using Quench Factor Analysis Method, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2008, 199(1–3), p 124–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T.S. Prasanna Kumar, Coupled Analysis of Surface Heat Flux, Microstructure Evolution, and Hardness During Immersion Quenching of a Medium Carbon Steel in Plant Conditions, Mater. Perform. Charact., 2012, 9(5), Paper ID MPC104477Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.V. Beck et al., Inverse Heat Conduction, Ill Posed Problems, Wiley/Interscience, New York, 1985Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    O.M. Alifanov, Inverse Heat Transfer Problems, Springer, Berlin, 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T.S. Prasanna Kumar, A Serial Solution for the 2-D Inverse Heat Conduction Problem for Estimating Multiple Heat Flux Components, Numer. Heat Transf. B, 2004, 45(6), p 541–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    T.S. Prasanna Kumar and H.C. Kamath, Multidimensional Analysis of Interface Heat Flux in Metallic Molds During Solidification of Aluminum Alloy Plate Castings, 108th Casting Congress of American Foundrymen’s Society, June 2004 (Rosemont, IL, USA)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Arun Kumar, K.V. Sreenivasa Rao, and T.S. Prasanna Kumar, Spatial Variation of Heat Flux at the Metal-Mold Interface due to Mold Filling Effects in Gravity Die-Casting, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2007, 51, p 2676–2685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    T.S. Prasanna Kumar, P.V.D. Ramesh, and D.R.G. Achar, Estimation of Heat Flux in GTAW Process Using Inverse Heat Conduction Method, IIW IC 08, Jan 2008 (Chennai)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Babu and T.S. Prasanna Kumar, Effect of Bath Temperature on Surface Heat Flux During Quenching in CNT Nanofluids, Heat Treat 2011, Oct 30–Nov 2, 2011 (Cincinnati, OH)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K.V. Sreenivasa Rao, “Spatial and Temporal Variation of Metal-Mold Interface Heat Flux During Gravity Die Casting,” Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, India, 2008Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    JMatPro by Sente Software: http://www.sentesoftware.co.uk
  21. 21.
    W.A. Johnson and R.F. Mehl, Reaction Kinetics in Processes of Nucleation and Growth, Trans. AIME, 1939, 135, p 416–458Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Avrami, Kinetics of Phase Change. I, General Theory, J. Chem. Phys., 1939, 7, p 1103–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Avrami, Kinetics of Phase Change. II: Transformation-Time Relations for Random Distribution of Nuclei, J. Chem. Phys., 1940, 8, p 212–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    D.P. Koistinen and R.E. Marburger, A General Equation Prescribing the Extent of the Austenite-Martensite Transformation in Pure Iron-Carbon Alloys and Carbon Steels, Acta Metall., 1959, 7, p 59–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringIIT MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations