Analysis of Tube Bend Data
To evaluate the tube bend test results in terms of rupture life, rupture ductility, and creep deformation, several assumptions were made. For rupture life, a reference stress, which can be thought of as the ‘average’ stress in a component that controls creep deformation, was considered to relate the stress in the uniaxial creep test to the more complex geometry of the thick-wall tube bend. Recent work comparing large databases of pressurized straight tube creep-rupture tests have shown the one particular definition of the reference stress (\( \upsigma_{\text{REF}}^{\text{StraightTube}} \)) for a tube under internal pressure gives good agreement over a range of tube sizes, conditions, and materials (Ref 17-19). This definition, which has recently been adopted as an alternative for design of components in ASME boiler and pressure vessel code Section I (Ref 1), is given by:
$$ \upsigma_{\text{REF}}^{\text{StraightTube}} = \frac{P}{{\ln (r_{\text{o}} /r_{\text{i}} )}} $$
(5)
where P is the internal pressure, r
o is the external radius, and r
i is the internal radius (Ref 17). Similar methods have provided a reference stress (\( \upsigma_{\text{REF}}^{\text{TubeBend}} \)) for a tube bend based on the tube thickness (t), the radius of the bend (a), and the mean diameter of the tube (b) given by:
$$ \upsigma_{\text{REF}}^{\text{TubeBend}} = \frac{Pb}{t}\frac{(1 - b/2a)}{(1 - b/a)}, $$
(6)
although there is limited experimental data to verify its accuracy (Ref 20, 21). The stresses calculated for the tube bends and the straight tube section are provided in Table 2, which shows that the stress in the bends approach the straight tube stress as bend radius increases. Figure 10 compares the tube bend time to rupture results with the uniaxial un-strained data, the expected behavior for alloy 740 (Eq 2), and the minimum expected rupture life (−20% on stress). The figure shows that, even accounting for the increase in stress due to the tube geometry, the data for the tube bend failures all fall well below the uniaxial behavior and even below the minimum life. Therefore, creep life is significantly reduced in alloy 740 due to cold-straining to levels of 15% or greater.
Table 2 Tube bend test and analysis results
Evaluation of creep ductility must take into account any ovality in the tube bend. Ovality was calculated based on the maximum (d
max) and minimum (d
min) diameter measurements on the OD as follows:
$$ {\text{Ovality}}\left( \% \right) = 100 \times 2\times \left( {d_{ \max } - d_{ \min } } \right)/\left( {d_{ \max } + d_{ \min } } \right). $$
(7)
Since the degree of ovality may change during creep, the circumference of the oval tube, which in earlier work was only considered as a circle (Ref 2), was approximated to obtain an average strain using:
$$ {\text{Circumference}} = \uppi \sqrt {\frac{{(d_{\max } )^{2} + (d_{\min } )^{2} }}{2}} . $$
(8)
Figure 11 shows the calculated ovality and strain measurements based on Eq 7 and 8 for the 15%OFS sample including the bend and straight section regions. At time zero, when the OD creep strain is 0, the sample has 2 to 3% ovality. As creep strain accumulates, the ovality decreases. The creep strain in the bend region is relatively uniform despite differences in measured ovality, presumably because creep deformation is uniform and Eq 8 accounts for the changing ovality. At failure, the ovality in the bend is nearly zero and the scatter is the same as the straight tube section. Data from power plant piping operating in the creep regime which failed with over 100,000 h of service showed a similar finding, that is, that ovality was reduced during operation, but did not reach zero ovality until failure (Ref 22). Thus, the tube bend tests, although less than 5000 h, appear re-produce realistic long-term in-service behavior.
To analyze the observed failures strains in Table 2, the effects of multiaxiality on creep were considered. Research on notched bars of alloy 740 tested at 750 °C showed that ductility obeyed Spindler’s equation (Ref 23, 24):
$$ \frac{{\upvarepsilon_{\text{true}}^{\text{Multiaxial}} }}{{\upvarepsilon_{\text{true}}^{\text{Uniaxial}} }} = \exp \left( {p\left( {1 - \frac{{\upsigma_{1} }}{{\upsigma_{\text{VM}} }}} \right) + q\left( {\frac{1}{2} - \frac{3}{2}\frac{{\upsigma_{\text{m}} }}{{\upsigma_{\text{VM}} }}} \right)} \right) = 0.702({\text{tube}}) $$
(9)
where p and q are constants (= 0.15 and 1.25, respectively), σ1 is the maximum principle stress, σVM is the effective stress, and σm is the mean stress. This gives a ratio of multiaxial strain at failure to uniaxial strain at failure of ~0.70 for a tube under internal pressure. The tube geometry is considered for simplicity since the authors have no knowledge of an approximation for the principle stresses in the bend. Utilizing the relationship established for uniaxial ductility (Eq 4) and the ratio obtained from Eq 9, Table 2 compares the calculated strain at failure to the actual measured true strain at failure for the tube bends. These data show the tube bends failed at significantly lower ductility compared to the prediction, approximately 0.1 to 0.2 of the calculated strain at failure. Therefore, the dramatic reduction in rupture ductility of alloy 740 tube bends is primarily due to the effect of pre-strain (cold-work) and not multiaxility.
To evaluate the creep deformation, the OD strain measurements were averaged for the data collected on each bend and on each straight section. These data along with the rupture strain are plotted in Fig. 12. The uniaxial creep tests on alloy 740 showed an increasing creep rate (tertiary creep) with little to no primary or secondary creep typical of many nickel-based alloys. The tube ‘creep-curves’ in Fig. 11 exhibit the same behavior. Since limited interrupted measurements were made on the tubes, the minimum creep rate was measured based on the first recorded datapoint, but could be slightly lower if shorter-term measurements were made. The data are reported in Table 2 and compared to the expected minimum creep rate calculated from Eq 3. The minimum creep rate for the straight section of the tube is in good agreement with the calculated uniaxial value indicating the reference stress is an appropriate approximation for the creep behavior of the structure, and the minimum creep rate based on the first OD measurement is reasonably accurate. With decreasing bend radius, the creep rate progressively increases which is consistent with increasing stress in the bend itself. However, when compared to the uniaxial expectations, the creep rates are ~6-10 times greater in the bends than the uniaxial data. Therefore, it appears cold-work does have a measurable weakening effect on creep deformation behavior of alloy 740.
Microstructure and Evaluation of Data
Extensive cavitation was noted in the region of highest strain (OD of the extrados) after creep testing in all the samples (Fig. 6). The cavity density is much higher compared to the un-strained uniaxial tests (Fig. 5), and cavitation is primarily on grain boundaries normal to the applied stress, which in this case is the pressure (hoop) stress. The damage is consistent with other nickel-based alloys with similar levels of gamma prime such as Nimonic 80A (Ref 7) and alloy 263 (Ref 10) which were pre-strained prior to creep. In this work, alloy 740 was cold-strained in the solution annealed condition whereas all the other reported tests induced cold-strain after the aging heat-treatment (which was used to precipitate gamma prime). The current work shows, that regardless of processing path, cold-work is detrimental to creep by greatly increasing the cavitation density.
A second important observation is the role of compressive cold-strain. Figure 9 shows that the region of highest compressive cold-strain (OD of the intrados), which should be equal in magnitude to the OD of the extrados if bending is uniform, had significantly less creep damage that the region of highest tensile cold-strain. Since grain interior slip is considered to be the main source of submicron cavitation (Ref 8), and because the applied creep stress (hoop stress) was normal to the cold-strain stress, little difference should be expected. However, due to conservation of volume and the type of bending utilized, the extrados of the tube bend was thicker than the intrados. Since the analysis methodology did not account for this change in thickness, the reduction in cavitation may be simply explained by a thicker wall leading to a lower stress.
The final failure location of the 25% and 15%OFS samples was in the region of highest tensile cold-strain, indicating that cold-work is a significant factor in controlling the creep life of the tube bend. Advanced damage was observed on the 35% sample in the same location, but failure initiated on the ID. There are two factors which could lead to higher stresses in this area. First, when a thick-walled tube is elastically loaded, the highest stress is on the tube ID, but during creep this stress relaxes and the highest creep stress redistributes to the tube OD (Ref 25). Because the 35% test was the shortest in duration, the high stresses may not have fully relaxed, leading to ID damage. A second factor is the change in ovality. As the data clearly show, the creep process reduces the ovality in the tube and the strain measurements are based on an averaged circumference. However, in reality, the strain must be non-uniform, and careful inspection of the raw OD measurement data revealed that most of the creep strain accumulation was not at the intrados or extrados of the bend but rather between the two. Thus, while creep damage is unequivocally linked to the extrados where the tensile cold-strain was highest, measured creep deformation was more pronounced towards the neutral axis. The ID of the 60° location had both higher tensile cold-strain and the stress redistribution due to ovality, and hence even in the longer-term test, the level of creep damage in that location is higher than other regions around the tube, expect for the area of highest cold-strain (Fig. 8).
The analysis methodology presented in the previous section showed that the rupture life reduction, reduction in creep ductility, and increase in minimum creep rate could not be explained by geometric effects alone, but rather that prior cold-work had a significant impact on component lifetimes and creep behavior. To examine if the reductions were within expectations based on similar alloy performance, the data from Ref 7-13 were normalized relative to uniaxial experiments on un-strained material in the same studies. In this work, a parallel uniaxial study was not conducted, so the comparison is made between the measured property from the tube bend test and the expected or calculated property of interest from the analysis methods applied to uniaxial un-strained specimens in this work, all of which is found in Table 2. The OFS calculation was used as the amount of cold-work for this comparison since the results showed the creep damage was concentrated, and ultimately rupture life was controlled by the location in the tube with this nominal level of strain.
Figure 13 is a comparison of the normalized rupture life data as a function of cold-strain. An exponential line was fit through the data from Ref 7, 8, 10-12. Data from IN597 (Ref 9) and Astroloy (Ref 13) were not fit because these alloys have much higher amounts of gamma prime compared to alloy 740 and the other alloys. Additionally, the research shows particle/interface cracking as a possible mechanisms leading to enhanced cavitation which is not expected since alloy 740 was formed in the annealed condition. The tube bends were not included in the extrapolation, but inspection of the figure shows the tube bend data is generally consistent with the other data. At 15% and greater cold work, the rupture life is 0.25 or less than the non-strained material and decreases with increasing cold-work. Few data are available beyond 15%, so the extrapolation is slightly conservative, but overall the tube bend analysis appears adequate for considering the effect of rupture life reduction due to cold-work in alloy 740.
Figure 14 shows a similar result for normalized creep-rupture ductility. Again, the tube bend analysis is generally consistent with the exponential extrapolation of similar literature data. The comparison from the tube bend analysis captures the same trend as the data and shows the reduction is approximately 0.2 to 0.1. The analysis takes into account the reduction in ductility due to multiaxial creep as well as the material behavior observed in un-strained specimens where ductility was a function of test time.
Figure 15 is a plot of increase in minimum creep rate as a function of material and cold-work. A linear extrapolation of the available literature data on age-hardenable nickel-based alloys shows very good agreement both in relative increase and absolute values. This suggests that alloy 740 behaves similarly to the other alloys and that the methodology presented in this work for approximating stress in the tube bends is accurate for creep prediction.