Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Outdoor and Indoor PL and EL Images in Si Solar Cells and Panels for Defect Detection and Classification

  • Topical Collection: 19th Conference on Defects (DRIP XIX)
  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, silicon solar plants consist of hundreds of thousands of panels. The detection and characterization of solar cell defects, particularly on-site, is crucial to maintaining high productivity at the solar plant. Among the different techniques for the inspection of the solar cell defects, luminescence techniques provide very useful information about the spatial distribution of defects. Electroluminescence performed in dark conditions (nEL) is the most commonly used technique. However, daylight EL (dEL) and daylight photoluminescence (dPL) have recently attracted interest, because they present noteworthy advantages for on-site inspections. In this paper, we present a detailed characterization of both damaged mono- and multi-crystalline silicon solar cells using dEL and dPL, comparing the results provided by these techniques with those obtained with high-resolution nEL and indoor PL (performed under excitation with a laser diode). Among these techniques, dEL provides reliable and reproducible results, while dPL shows more dependence on the experimental conditions, demanding additional efforts for analysis. The limited resolution obtained with the actual IR camera technologies is a limiting factor of the dEL and dPL techniques. On the other hand, they can be performed on-site, testing a very large number of panels. Therefore, we can assert that on-site dEL is well suited for massive inspection of solar plants, while more research is necessary for dPL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Bahar, P. Bojek, Solar PV. Tech. rep., Paris: International Energy Agency (2020).

  2. Y. Chu, and P. Meisen, Review and Comparison of Different Solar Energy Technologies (San Diego: Global Energy Network Institute (GENI), 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Kumar, and A. Kumar, Performance assessment and degradation analysis of solar photovoltaic technologies: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 78, 554 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. https://www.statista.com/statistics/280220/global-cumulative-installed-solar-pv-capacity/

  5. S. Gallardo-Saavedra, L. Hernández-Callejo, M.C. Alonso-García, J.D. Santos, J.I. Morales-Aragones, V. Alonso-Gómez, A.M. Moretón-Fernández, M.A. González-Rebollo, and O. Martínez, Nondestructive characterization of solar PV cells defects by means of electroluminescence, infrared thermography, I-V curves and visual tests: experimental study and comparison. Energy 205, 117930 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Aghaei, A. Fairbrother, A. Gok, S. Ahmad, S. Kazim, K. Lobato, G. Oreski, A. Reinders, J. Schmitz, M. Theelen, P. Yilmaz, and J. Kettle, Review of degradation and failure phenomena in photovoltaic modules. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 159, 112160 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. I. Høiaas, K. Grujic, A. Gerd, I. Burud, E. Olsen, and N. Belbachir, Inspection and condition monitoring of large-scale photovoltaic power plants: a review of imaging technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 161, 112353 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Koester, S. Lindig, A. Louwen, A. Astigarraga, G. Manzolini, and D. Moser, Review of photovoltaic module degradation, field inspection techniques and techno-economic assessment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 165, 112616 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Köntges, S. Kurtz, C. Packard, U. Jahn, K. A. Berger, K. Kato, T. Friesen, H. Liu, et al. IEA-PVPS task 13: performance and reliability of photovoltaic systems. Subtask 3.2: Review of Failures of Photovoltaic Modules. Technical report, International Energy Agency (2014).

  10. M. Guada, A. Moretón, S. Rodríguez-Conde, L.A. Sánchez, M. Martínez, M.A. González, J. Jiménez, L. Pérez, V. Parra, and O. Martínez, Energy Sci. Eng. 8, 3839 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Navarrete, L. Pérez, F. Domínguez, G. Castillo, R. Gómez, M. Martínez, J. Coello, V. Parra, On-site inspection of PV modules using an internationally accredited PV mobile lab: a three-year experience operating worldwide. in 31st Eur. Photovolt. Sol. Energy Conf. Exhib. p. 1989 (2015).

  12. S. Koch, T. Weber, C. Sobottka, A. Fladung, P. Clemens, J. Berghold, Outdoor electroluminescence imaging of crystalline photovoltaic modules: comparative study between manual ground—level inspections and drone—based aerial surveys. in 32nd Eur. Photovolt. Sol. Energy Conf. Exhib., p. 1736 (2016).

  13. L. Stoicescu, M. Reuter, J.H. Werner, Daysy: luminescence imaging of PV modules in daylight. in 29th Eur. Photovolt. Sol. Energy Conf. Exhib., p. 2553 (2014).

  14. J. Adams, B. Doll, C. Buerhop, T. Pickel, J. Teubner, C. Camus, C.J. Brabec, Non-stationary outdoor EL-measurements with a fast and highly sensitive InGaAs camera. in 32nd Eur. Photovolt. Sol. Energy Conf. Exhib., p. 1837 (2015).

  15. M. Demant, J. Haunschild, M. Glatthaar, M. Demant, J. Nievendick, M. Motzko, S. Rein, and E.R. Weber, Quality control of as-cut multicrystalline silicon wafers using photoluminescence imaging for solar cell production. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 94, 2007 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Bhoopathy, O. Kunz, M. Juhl, T. Trupke, and Z. Hameiri, Outdoor photoluminescence imaging of photovoltaic modules with sunlight excitation. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 26, 69 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. G.A. dos Reis Benatto, C. Mantel, A.A. Santamaria Lancia, P.B. Poulsen, S. Forchhammer, S.V. Spataru, Laser induced luminescence characterization of mechanically stressed PV cells. in Proceedings of 48th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, p. 1949 (2021).

  18. B. Doll, J. Hepp, M. Hoffmann, R. Schüler, C. Buerhop-Lutz, I.M. Peters, J.A. Hauch, A. Maier, and C.J. Brabec, Photoluminescence for defect detection on full-sized photovoltaic modules. IEEE J. Photovolt. 11, 1419 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. C. Mantel, G.A. dos Reis Benatto, N. Riedel, S. Thorsteinsson, P.B. Poulsen, H. Parikh, S. Spataru, D. Sera and S. Forchhammer, SNR study of outdoor electroluminescence images under high sun irradiation. in 7th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC), p. 3285 (2018).

  20. M. Köntges, S. Kajari-Schröder, I. Kunze, U. Jahn, Crack statistic of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules. in Proceedings of the 26th Eur. Photovolt. Sol. Energy Conf. Exhib., Hamburg, Germany, p. 3290 (2011).

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been financed by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, under project PID2020-113533RB-C33, and by the Regional Government of Castilla y León (Junta de Castilla y León) and by the Ministry of Science and Innovation and the European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR. C. Terrados also appreciates the funding from “Junta de Castilla y León” (“proyecto de garantía juvenil”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GdS-Optronlab Group, Dpto. Física de la Materia Condensada, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain

    C. Terrados, D. González-Francés, V. Alonso, M. A. González, J. Jiménez & O. Martínez

Authors
  1. C. Terrados
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. González-Francés
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. Alonso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. A. González
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Jiménez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. O. Martínez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Martínez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Terrados, C., González-Francés, D., Alonso, V. et al. Comparison of Outdoor and Indoor PL and EL Images in Si Solar Cells and Panels for Defect Detection and Classification. J. Electron. Mater. 52, 5189–5198 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-023-10535-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-023-10535-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation