Abstract
We propose a modified Kuznetsov model to calculate the output performance of a cesium thermionic energy converter (TEC). Based on this model, it can be found that the power density and conversion efficiency increase continuously as the emitter temperature increases. Reducing the work function of the emitter can significantly increase the power density, whereas the conversion efficiency with the change of the work function shows a parabolic trend with a downward-facing opening. The power density of the TEC has an approximate step function relation with the collector temperature, which should be selected at the inflection point of the function curve during device design. Considering the effects of electrode spacing and cesium vapor pressure, the product of the two influencing factors should be kept at approximately 74 Pa mm to reduce the barrier level of the electrode gap. Through further structural optimization design, the conversion efficiency of the TEC could be improved at a 1600 K emitter temperature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Y. Wang, S.H. Su, T. Liu, G.Z. Su, and J.C. Chen, Energy 90, 1575 (2015).
V.I. Kuznetsov, A.Y. Ender, and V.I. Babanin, J. Appl. Phys. 124, 44502 (2018).
H.C. Zhang, D.Z. Yin, X.M. Chai, B.R. Kong, and X.T. Liu, Front. Energy Res. 7, 167 (2020).
R.A. Becker, J. Spacecr. Rockets 4, 847 (1967).
I.A. Dorfgorsky, A.A. Yelchaninov, A.N. Luppov, V.P. Nicitin, B.G. Ogloblin, G.V. Sinyutin, and V.A. Usov, in AIP Conference Proceedings (1992), p. 35.
M.R. Martinez, O. Izhvanov, B. Robertson, P.N. Clark, H.H. Streckert, and J.L. Desplat, SAE Tech. Pap. 746, 926 (2005).
W.R. Determan, V.P. Kolesnikov, G.S. Mezheritsky, V.Y. Poupko, I.N. Prilezhaeva, A.N. Ryzhkov, A.V. Vizgalov, and A.V. Zrodnikov, in 12th Symposium on Space Nuclear Power and Propulsion (1995), p. 211.
Y. Momozaki, M.S. El-Genk, in Space Technology and Applications International Forum—Staif (2003), p. 757.
V.I. Yarygin and A.S. Mustafaev, J. Phys. Chem. B 9, 546 (2015).
G. Xiao, G.H. Zheng, M. Qiu, Q. Li, D.S. Li, and M.J. Ni, Appl. Energy 208, 1318 (2017).
J.H. Lee, I. Bargatin, N.A. Melosh, and R.T. Howe, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 573 (2012).
W. Zheng and M. Kando, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 5273 (2000).
E. Rahman and A. Nojeh, in 2021 34th International Vacuum Nanoelectronics Conference (2021), p. 97.
E. Rahman and A. Nojeh, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 24082 (2020).
D. Jensen, A.N.M. Taufiq Elahi, M. Ghashami, and K. Park, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 24062 (2021).
K.G. Hernqvist, in Proceedings of the IEEE (2005), p. 748.
D.V. Paramonov and M.S. ElGenk, Energy Convers. Manag. 38, 533 (1997).
A.S. Mustafaev, V.I. Yarygin, V.S. Soukhomlinov, A.B. Tsyganov, and I.D. Kaganovich, J. Appl. Phys. 124, 123304 (2008).
N.S. Rasor, J. Appl. Phys. 120, 8 (2016).
Z.M. Ding, L.G. Chen, and F.R. Sun, J. Energy Inst. 88, 169 (2015).
N.S. Rasor, in Proceedings of the IEEE (1963), p. 733.
G.N. Hatsopoulos, E.P. Gyftopoulos, Thermionic energy conversion (The MIT Press, 1973).
M.S. El-Genk and J.R. Luke, Energy Convers. Manag. 40, 319 (1999).
S. Kitrilakis and M. Meeker, Adv. Energy Mater. 3, 59 (1963).
M.S. El-Genk and Y. Momozaki, Energy Convers. Manag. 43, 911 (2002).
L.A. DuBridge and W.W. Roehr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 52 (1932).
B.S. Rump and B.L. Gehman, J. Appl. Phys. 36, 2352 (1965).
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.2180051117) and the National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Program of China (No. 2018YFE0312200)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, M., Fang, S., Jiang, Z. et al. Optimization and Analysis of an Output Performance Calculation Model for a Cesium Thermionic Energy Converter. J. Electron. Mater. 52, 437–445 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-022-10010-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-022-10010-4