Abstract
The use of low-potential energy sources is an urgent problem of our time, as more than 70% of the energy used by mankind is lost in the form of low-potential waste. A promising technology of converting such thermal energy into electricity is the thermoelectric method. The scale of use of any technology depends on its efficiency. The problem of TEG efficiency can be divided into two separate tasks—the task of creating efficient thermoelectric materials, and the task of optimizing the parameters of thermoelectric devices. In real conditions the last task plays a significant, often crucial, role. Therefore, many works are devoted to their research. The fundamental basis for solving this problem is the mathematical modeling of the thermoelectric generator circuit, which includes a heat source, a thermoelectric converter, a cooling system, and a payload. In this paper the author presents some generalized results of previous research that can benefit the developers of thermoelectric devices. The first part of the article presents the basics of the methodology used. Next, I draw attention to the possibility of better tuning of the properties of thermoelectric materials to a specific task in case of considering external conditions. The final part of the paper provides an assessment of technical and economic indicators of TEG and formulates the conditions under which this technology can ensure competitiveness in the modern energy market.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- Bi :
-
Biot criterion
- I :
-
Electrical current (A)
- j :
-
Current density (A/cm2)
- e :
-
Seebeck coefficient (V/K)
- E :
-
Electromotive force (V)
- λ :
-
Coefficient of thermal conductivity (W/cm_K)
- σ :
-
Coefficient of electrical conductivity (Ωcm)−1
- G o :
-
Specific cost ($/W)
- h :
-
Thermocouple leg length (cm, mm)
- J = jeh/λ :
-
Dimensionless current density
- n :
-
The charge carrier concentration (cm−3)
- s :
-
Thermoelectric leg cross sectional area (cm2)
- To :
-
Determining temperature (K)
- T h :
-
Hot junction temperature (K)
- T c :
-
Cold junction temperature (K)
- dT :
-
Junction temperature difference (K)
- t h :
-
Heat carrier temperature (K)
- t c :
-
Coolant temperature (K)
- dt :
-
Temperature difference of heat carriers (K)
- θ = T/T o :
-
Dimensionless temperature
- ϑ=t/T o :
-
Dimensionless temperature of fluid
- Ki=qh/λT o :
-
Dimensionless heat flow density
- z=e 2 σ/λ :
-
Thermoelectric figure-of-merit (K−1)
- zT o :
-
Dimensionless thermoelectric figure-of-merit
- N :
-
Electrical power (W)
- N o :
-
Specific power (W/cm2)
- N x = Nh/(λsT o ) :
-
Dimensionless power
- q :
-
Heat flow density (W/cm2)
- Q :
-
Heat flow (W)
- η :
-
Energy conversion factor/efficiency
- η c = (T h –T c )/T h :
-
Carnot efficiency
- α :
-
Heat transfer coefficient (W/cm2_K)
- R a :
-
Thermal resistance (Kcm2/W)
- R :
-
Electrical resistance (Ω)
- RL :
-
Electrical load resistance (Ω)
- m = RL/R :
-
Load factor
- Y = y/h :
-
Dimensionless coordinate
- LCOE:
-
Levelized cost of electricity ($/kWh)
References
A. Ioffe, Semiconductor Thermoelements and Thermoelectric Cooling Infosearch, ltd., London, 1957
S. LeBlanc, Sustain. Mater. Technol., 2014, 1–2, p 26–35.
S. LeBlanc, S.K. Yee, M.L. Scullin, C. Dames, and K.E. Goodson, Renew. Sustain. Ener. Rev., 2014, 32, p 313–327.
T.J. Hendricks, S. Yee, and S. LeBlanc, J. Electron. Mater, 2016, 45, p 1751–1761.
T.J. Hendricks. 15th European Conference on Thermoelectrics. Padua, Italy, 26. (2017).
J. Terry, Hendricks MRS Adv., 2019, 4(8), p 457–471.
Levelized Cost of Energy and Levelized Cost of Storage (2019). www.lazard.com/perspective/lcoe2019
L. Chen, F. Meng, and F. Sun, Scientia Iranica B, 2012, 19(5), p 1337–1345.
Y. Apertet, H. Ouerdane, C. Goupil, and Ph. Lecoeur, J. Appl. Phys., 2014, 116, p 144901.
Y. Lobunets, J. Thermoelectricity, 2014, 2, p 65–78.
Y. Lobunets. Methods of development and design of thermoelectric energy converters. (Naukova Dumka, Kyiv, 1989), 176 p. (1989).
L.P. Yarin, The Pi-Theorem Springer, Berlin, 2012, p 306
J.C. Gibbings, Dimensional Analysis Springer, London, 2011, p 313
I.I. Novikov, and V.M. Borishanskii, Similarity theory in thermodynamics and heat transfer Atomizdat, Moscow, 1979, p 184
Y. Apertet, H. Ouerdane, O. Glavatskaya, C. Goupil, and P. Lecoeur, Europhys. Lett., 2012, 97, p 28001.
S.K. Yee, S. LeBlanc, K.E. Goodson, and C. Dames, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, p 2561–2571.
L. Lauryn, G. Baranowski, J. Snyder, and S. Eric, Toberer. J. Appl. Phys., 2013, 113, p 1–10.
G. J. Snyder, E.S. Toberer. Nat. Mater., vol 7, (2008).
Du. Yong, Xu. Jiayue, B. Paul, and P. Eklund, Appl. Mater. Today, 2018, 12, p 366–388.
N. Connor. What is Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient—Definition. Accessed 26 June 2020, from https://www.thermal-engineering.org/what-is-convective-heat-transfer-coefficient-definition/.
U.S. Department of Energy, Thermodynamics, Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Volume 2 of 3. (2016).
R. Shah, and D. Sekuli, Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design Wiley, Hoboken, 2003
Yuriy Lobunets. Patent UA N 83157 U. (2013).
O. Paris, J. Moczygemba. Patent US2013/0213449A1 (2013).
F. Andreasson, F. Stromer, M. Ross. Patent EP 2 960 953 A1 (2015).
Y. Lobunets, I. Abdurakhmanov. GJRE F, Vol 20, Is. 1, Vers. 1.0, 1-7 (2020).
N. Wojtas, M. Grab, and W. Glatz, Hierold. J. Electron. Mater., 2013, 42, p 2103–2109.
Y. Lobunets, J. Electron. Mater., 2019, 48, p 5491–5496.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the US National Science Foundation under Award No. 1722127, by the US Office of Naval Research under Contract No. 68335-20-C-0534, and the Priority Research Program of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lobunets, Y. Improving the Economic Efficiency of Thermoelectric Generators by Optimizing Heat Transfer Conditions. J. Electron. Mater. 50, 2860–2869 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-021-08797-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-021-08797-9