Abstract
The ongoing electrification and miniaturization increase the quality demands on solder joints. A bottleneck for solder joint reliability can be the intermetallic Cu6Sn5 phase, which undergoes a phase transition, implying a volume change in a relevant temperature range. There are contradicting reports on the sign and magnitude of this volume change, which possibly implements stresses and cracks in solder joints. To clarify the characteristics of the phase transition, different samples were manufactured by applying industrial-like standards and isothermal heat treatments around the predicted phase transition temperature. Using x-ray diffraction, a coexistence of ordered η′ and disordered η was detected in samples treated at 438–445 K. The lattice parameters show that the volume of the disordered η phase is approximately 0.64–0.65% smaller than the one of the ordered η′ phase. A comparison with order–disorder transitions in structurally related phases shows that the volume change based on order–disorder transitions is normally of opposite sign and around 0.1–0.2%. Therefore, an effect of different compositions is considered responsible for the volume change. Adopting the exact composition Cu6Sn5 (Cu1.20Sn) for the η′ phase, it was estimated, based on density functional theory calculations from the literature, that the coexisting η phase assumes lower Cu content of Cu1.171Sn at 438 K and Cu1.174Sn at 445 K. In contrast, the lattice parameters of η′, generated at different temperatures, imply a largely temperature-independent composition of Cu1.20Sn. This leads to adjustments of the Cu-Sn phase diagram.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Lidin and A.-K. Larsson, J. Solid State Chem. 118, 313 (1995).
A.-K. Larsson, L. Stenberg, and S. Lidin, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 50, 636 (1994).
A.-K. Larsson, L. Stenberg, S. Lidin, and Z. Kristallogr, Cryst. Mater. 210, 832 (1995).
Y. Wu, J. Barry, T. Yamamoto, Q. Gu, S. McDonald, S. Matsumura, H. Huang, and K. Nogita, Acta Mater. 60, 6581 (2012).
D.K. Mu, S.D. McDonald, J. Read, H. Huang, and K. Nogita, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 20, 55 (2016).
C. Wieser, A. Walnsch, W. Huegel, and A. Leineweber, J. Alloys Comp. 794, 491 (2019).
A. Leineweber, M. Ellner, and E. Mittemeijer, J. Solid State Chem. 159, 191 (2001).
A. Leineweber, J. Solid State Chem. 177, 1197 (2004).
A. Leineweber, J. Solid State Chem. 182, 1846 (2009).
M. Elding-Pontén, L. Stenberg, A.-K. Larsson, S. Lidin, and K. Ståhl, J. Solid State Chem. 129, 231 (1997).
M. Elding-Pontén, L. Stenberg, S. Lidin, G. Madariaga, and J.M. Pérez-Mato, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 53, 364 (1997).
S. Lidin and S. Piao, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 31, 3548 (2018).
M. Ellner, T. Gödecke, and K. Schubert, J. Less Common Met. 24, 23 (1971).
A.-K. Larsson and R. Withers, J. Alloys Compd. 264, 125 (1998).
N. Saunders and A.P. Miodownik, Bull. Alloy Phase Diagr. 3, 278 (1990).
G. Raynor, The Equilibrium Diagram of the System Copper–Tin (London: Institute of Metals, 1944).
A. Westgren, G. Phragmén, and Z. Anorg, Allg. Chem. 175, 80 (1928).
S. Fuertauer, D. Li, D. Cupid, and H. Flandorfer, Intermetallics 34, 142 (2013).
S. Lidin, S. Piao, and Z. Anorg, Allg. Chem. 635, 611 (2009).
P. Franke and D. Neuschuetz, Binary Systems. Part 3: Binary Systems from Cs-K to Mg-Zr (Landolt-Börnstein—Group IV Physical Chemistry) (Berlin: Springer, 2005), pp. 1–4.
M.Y. Li, Z.H. Zhang, and J. Kim, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 201901 (2011).
G. Zeng, S.D. McDonald, J.J. Read, Q. Gu, and K. Nogita, Acta Mater. 69, 135 (2014).
G. Ghosh and M. Asta, J. Mater. Res. 20, 3102 (2005).
K. Nogita, C.M. Gourlay, and T. Nishimaru, J. Electron. Mater. 61, 45 (2009).
D. Mu, J. Read, Y. Yang, and K. Nogita, J. Mater. Res. 26, 2660 (2011).
K. Nogita, D. Mu, S. McDonald, J. Read, and Y. Wu, Intermetallics 26, 78 (2012).
J. Xian, G. Zeng, S. Belyakov, Q. Gu, K. Nogita, and C. Gourlay, Intermetallics 91, 50 (2017).
Bruker AXS GmbH, TOPAS V. 5.0, Karlsruhe (2004)
P. Thompson, D.E. Cox, and J.B. Hastings, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 20, 79 (1987).
G.S. Pawley, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 14, 357 (1981).
W.L. Bragg, Philos. Mag. 28, 355 (1914).
H. Knödler, Acta Crystallogr. 10, 86 (1957).
A. Gangulee, G.C. Das, and M.B. Bever, Metall. Trans. 4, 2063 (1973).
Y. Yuan, Y. Guan, D. Li, and N. Moelans, J. Alloys Compd. 661, 282 (2016).
G. Zeng, S.D. McDonald, Q. Gu, Y. Terada, K. Uesugi, H. Yasuda, and K. Nogita, Acta Mater. 83, 357 (2015).
V. Vuorinen, T. Laurila, T. Mattila, E. Heikinheimo, and J.K. Kivilahti, J. Electron. Mater. 36, 1355 (2007).
A. Leineweber, S.L. Shang, and Z.K. Liu, Acta Mater. 86, 374 (2015).
S. Ramos de Debiaggi, C. Deluque Toro, G.F. Cabeza, and A. Fernández Guillermet, J. Alloys Compd. 542, 280 (2012).
L. Cheng, A. Boettger, T.H. de Keijser, and E.J. Mittemeijer, Scr. Metall. Mater. 24, 509 (1990).
F.J.J. van Loo, Prog. Solid State Chem. 20, 47 (1990).
T. Gressmann, A. Leineweber, and E.J. Mittemeijer, Philos. Mag. 88, 145 (2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wieser, C., Hügel, W., Walnsch, A. et al. Two-Phase η′ + η Region in Cu6Sn5 Intermetallic: Insight into the Order–Disorder Transition from Diffusion Couples. J. Electron. Mater. 49, 245–256 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-019-07643-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-019-07643-3