Abstract
ZnO thin films are interesting for applications in several technological fields, including optoelectronics and renewable energies. Nanodevice applications require controlled synthesis of ZnO structures at nanometer scale, which can be achieved via atomic layer deposition (ALD). However, the mechanisms governing the initial stages of ALD had not been addressed until very recently. Investigations into the initial nucleation and growth as well as the atomic structure of the heterointerface are crucial to optimize the ALD process and understand the structure–property relationships for ZnO. We have used a complementary suite of in situ synchrotron x-ray techniques to investigate both the structural and chemical evolution during ZnO growth by ALD on two different substrates, i.e., SiO2 and Al2O3, which led us to formulate an atomistic model of the incipient growth of ZnO. The model relies on the formation of nanoscale islands of different size and aspect ratio and consequent disorder induced in the Zn neighbors’ distribution. However, endorsement of our model requires testing and discussion of possible alternative models which could account for the experimental results. In this work, we review, test, and rule out several alternative models; the results confirm our view of the atomistic mechanisms at play, which influence the overall microstructure and resulting properties of the final thin film.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Pearton, D. Norton, K. Ip, Y. Heo, and T. Steiner, Prog. Mater. Sci. 50, 293 (2005).
A. Janotti and G.C. Van de Walle, Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 126501 (2009).
C.Y. Lee, et al., Semicond. Sci. Technol. 25, 105008 (2010).
H. Jin, et al., Sci. Rep. 3, 2140 (2013).
Y. Ren, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 4909 (2012).
L. Schmidt-Mende and J.L. MacManus-Driscoll, Mater. Today 10, 40 (2007).
M. Law, L.E. Greene, J.C. Johnson, R. Saykally, and P. Yang, Nat. Mater. 4, 455 (2005).
Y. Kuang, et al., Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 106502 (2013).
T. Tynell and M. Karppinen, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 29, 043001 (2014).
G. Luka, M. Godlewski, E. Guziewicz, P. Stakhira, V. Cherpak, and D. Volynyuk, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 27, 074006 (2012).
M.-J. Chen, J.-R. Yang, and M. Shiojiri, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 27, 074005 (2012).
J. Niinistö, K. Kukli, M. Heikkilä, M. Ritala, and M. Leskelä, Adv. Eng. Mater. 11, 223 (2009).
D.D. Fong, J.A. Eastman, S.K. Kim, T.T. Fister, M.J. Highland, P.M. Baldo, and P.H. Fuoss, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 191904 (2010).
R. Boichot, et al., Chem. Mater. 28, 592 (2016).
M.H. Chu, L. Tian, A. Chaker, V. Cantelli, T. Ouled, R. Boichot, A. Crisci, S. Lay, M.-I. Richard, O. Thomas, J.-L. Deschanvres, H. Renevier, D.D. Fong, and G. Ciatto, Cryst. Growth Des. 16, 5339 (2016).
The reactor has been designed and built with the guidance of Mr. Dominique de Barros.
G. Ciatto, M.H. Chu, P. Fontaine, N. Aubert, H. Renevier, and J.L. Deschanvres, Thin Solid Films 617, 48 (2016).
P. Fontaine, G. Ciatto, N. Aubert, and M. Goldmann, Sci. Adv. Mater. 6, 2312 (2014).
C. Brouder, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2, 701 (1990).
G. Ciatto, F. d’Acapito, F. Boscherini, and S. Mobilio, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 11, 278 (2004).
O. Bunau and Y. Joly, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 345501 (2009).
G.E. Kimball and G.H. Shortley, Phys. Rev. 45, 815 (1934).
H. Iwanaga, A. Kunishige, and S. Takeuchi, J. Mater. Sci. 35, 2451 (2000).
M. Malvestuto, et al., Phys. Rev. B 71, 075318 (2005).
R.L. Puurunen and W. Vandervorst, J. Appl. Phys. 96, 7686 (2004).
A.R. Chetal, P. Mahto, and P.R. Sarode, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 49, 279 (1988).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chu, MH., Tian, L., Chaker, A. et al. Evaluation of Alternative Atomistic Models for the Incipient Growth of ZnO by Atomic Layer Deposition. J. Electron. Mater. 46, 3512–3517 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-017-5448-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-017-5448-2