Comparison of the Adsorption of Fe(III) on Alpha- and Gamma-MnO2 Nanostructure

Abstract

Aqueous industrial wastes from heavy industry factories contain a large amount of Fe ions, which constitute a hazard for human life even at trace concentrations. Adsorption technology is a promising method for removing Fe(III) from aqueous solutions. In this report, the adsorption of the Fe(III) ion on γ- and α-MnO2 nanostructures was compared. The results showed that the maximum adsorption was obtained at pH = 3.5 for both materials after 120 min for γ-MnO2 and 80 min for α-MnO2. Adsorption isotherm models, such as Langmuir, Freundlich, Sips, Tempkin, and Dubinin–Radushkevich were applied to determine adsorption capacity as well as the nature of the uptake. The highest R 2, the smallest of root mean squared error (RMSE), and the nonlinear Chi-square test (χ2) values determined that the Sips model was the most appropriate equation to describe the adsorption of Fe(III) on γ- and α-MnO2. The maximum monolayer adsorption capacity calculated from the Langmuir model and the maximum adsorption capacity calculated from the Sips model of γ-MnO2 was more than four times that of α-MnO2. The heat of the adsorption as well as the mean free energy estimated from Tempkin and Dubinin–Radushkevich was determined to be less than 8 kJ/mol, which showed that the adsorption on both materials followed a physical process. Kinetic studies showed that a pseudo-second-order model was accurately described on both samples with three stages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    H.A. Talaat, M.Y. Ghaly, E.M. Kamel, E.M. Ahmed, and A.M. Awad, J. Am. Sci. 6, 7 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    G. Hodaifa, J.M. Ochando-Pulido, S.B. Driss Alami, S. Rodriguez-Vives, and A. Martinez-Ferez, Ind. Crop. Prod. 49, 9 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    L.M. Nieto, S.B.D. Alami, G. Hodaifa, C. Faur, S. Rodríguez, J.A. Giménez, and J. Ochando, Ind. Crop. Prod. 32, 5 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    T.M. Alslaibi, I. Abustan, M.A. Ahmad, and A.A. Foul, Desalin. Water Treat. 52, 11 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    A. Burke, E. Yilmaz, N. Hasirci, and O. Yilmaz, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 84, 8 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    U. Kouakou, A.S. Ello, J.A. Yapo, and A. Trokourey, J. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. 5, 4 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    M.K. Seliem and S. Komarneni, Microporous. Mesoporous. Mater. 228, 9 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    M. Sun, B. Lan, L. Yu, F. Ye, W. Song, J. He, G. Diao, and Y. Zheng, Mater. Lett. 86, 3 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    F. Tedjar and J. Guitton, Thermochim. Acta. 181, 10 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    M. Singh, D.N. Thanh, P. Ulbrich, N. Strnadová, and F. Štěpánek, J. Solid State Chem. 183, 8 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    L. Ngoc Chung and D. Van Phuc, Adv. Nat. Sci.: Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 6, 8 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    V.-P. Dinh, N.-C. Le, T.-P.-T. Nguyen, and N.-T. Nguyen, J. Chem. 2016, 9 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    K.Y. Foo and B.H. Hameed, Chem. Eng. J. 156, 9 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    J. Anwar, U. Shafique, Z. Waheed uz, M. Salman, A. Dar, and S. Anwar, Bioresour. Technol. 101, 4 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    R.R. Bhatt and B.A. Shah, Arab J. Chem. 8, 13 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    F.-C. Wu, R.-L. Tseng, and R.-S. Juang, J. Hazard. Mater. 73, 13 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Van-Phuc Dinh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dinh, VP., Le, NC., Le, TD. et al. Comparison of the Adsorption of Fe(III) on Alpha- and Gamma-MnO2 Nanostructure. Journal of Elec Materi 46, 3681–3688 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-017-5287-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • γ-MnO2
  • α-MnO2
  • adsorption
  • Fe(III)
  • kinetics