Journal of Electronic Materials

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 1747–1753 | Cite as

How Many Peripheral Solder Joints in a Surface Mounted Design Experience Inelastic Strains?

Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

It has been established that it is the peripheral solder joints that are the most vulnerable in the ball-grid-array (BGA) and column-grid-array (CGA) designs and most often fail. As far as the long-term reliability of a soldered microelectronics assembly as a whole is concerned, it makes a difference, if just one or more peripheral joints experience inelastic strains. It is clear that the low cycle fatigue lifetime of the solder system is inversely proportional to the number of joints that simultaneously experience inelastic strains. A simple and physically meaningful analytical expression (formula) is obtained for the prediction, at the design stage, of the number of such joints, if any, for the given effective thermal expansion (contraction) mismatch of the package and PCB; materials and geometrical characteristics of the package/PCB assembly; package size; and, of course, the level of the yield stress in the solder material. The suggested formula can be used to determine if the inelastic strains in the solder material could be avoided by the proper selection of the above characteristics and, if not, how many peripheral joints are expected to simultaneously experience inelastic strains. The general concept is illustrated by a numerical example carried out for a typical BGA package. The suggested analytical model (formula) is applicable to any soldered microelectronics assembly. The roles of other important factors, such as, e.g., solder material anisotropy, grain size, and their random orientation within a joint, are viewed in this analysis as less important factors than the level of the interfacial stress. The roles of these factors will be accounted for in future work and considered, in addition to the location of the joint, in a more complicated, more sophisticated, and more comprehensive reliability/fatigue model.

Keywords

solder material yield strain low-cycle fatigue stress analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J.D. Morrow, ASTM STP 378 (Philadelphia: ASTM, 1964), pp. 45–87.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.S. Manson, Thermal Stress and Low Cycle Fatigue (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.N. Wild, IBM Tech. Rep. 73Z000421 (1973).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Engelmaier, in Proceedings of the International Electronics Packaging Conference (IEPS) (San Diego, 1982), p. 15.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P.M. Hall, IEEE Trans. Compon. Hybrids Manuf. Technol. CHMT-7, 314 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Suhir, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Microelectronics (Atlanta: ISHM, 1986)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.C. Shine and L.R. Fox, Low Cycle Fatigue, ASTM ST 942 (Philadelphia: ASTM, 1987), p. 588.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.R. Wilcox, R. Subrahmanyan, and C.-Y. Li, in Proceedings of the 2nd ASM International Electronic Materials and Processing Congress (ASM, 1989), p. 203.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Engelmaier and A.I. Attarwala, IEEE Trans. Compon. Hybrids Manuf. Technol. CHMT-12, 284 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Suhir, J. Appl. Mech. 56, 328 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.M. Hall, F.L. Howland, Y.S. Kim, and L.H. Herring, J. Electron. Packag. 112, 288 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Lau, eds., Solder Joint Reliability: Theory and Applications (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.-P. Clech, F.M. Langerman, and J.A. Augis, in Proceedings of the 40th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (Las Vegas, 1990), p. 377.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Engelmaier, in Proceedings of the Surface Mount International, vol. 1 (San Jose, 1992), p. 433.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    IPC Guidelines IPC-SM-785, The Institute for Interconnecting and Packaging Electronic Circuits (Lincolnwood, 1992).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Phelan and S. Wang, in Proceedings of the 43rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (Orlando, 1993), pp. 858–862.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.-P. Clech, D.M. Noctor, J.C. Manock, G.W. Lynott, and F.E. Bader, in Proceeding of the 44th ECT C. (Washington, DC, 1994), pp. 487–497.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A.J. Mawer, S.C. Bolton, and E. Mammo, in Proceedings of the Surface Mount International Conference (San Jose, 1994), pp. 239–251.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. Engelmaier, in Proceedings of the Surface Mount International Conference (San Jose, 1995), pp. 344–358; also in Proceedings of the International Electronics Packaging Conference (IEPS) (San Diego, 1995), pp. 758–774.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    L. Zhang, J.-G. Han, Y. Guo, and C.-W. He, Microelectron. Reliab. 54, 281 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. Bieler and H. Jiang, in 2006 Electronics Components and Technology Conference (2006).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. Arfaei1, Y. Xing, J. Woods, J. Wolcott, P. Tumne, P. Borgesen, and E. Cotts, in 2008 Electronics Components and Technology Conference (2008), pp. 459–465.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Swenson, J. Mater. Sci. 18, 39 (2007).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Suhir, J. Appl. Mech. 53, 657 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    E. Suhir, J. Appl. Mech. 56, 595 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    A.Y. Kuo, J. Appl. Mech. 57, 585 (1990).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S.P. Timoshenko and S. Woinowsky-Krieger, Theory of Plates and Shells (New York: Van-Nostrand Reinhold, 1940).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    E. Suhir, Structural Analysis in Microelectronics and Fiber Optics (New York: Van-Nostrand Reinhold, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    V. Mishkevich and E. Suhir, Structural Analysis in Microelectronics and Fiber Optics, ed. E. Suhir (New York: ASME Press, 1993)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    E. Suhir, R. Ghaffarian, and J. Nicolics, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 27, 2430 (2016).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    P. Vianco and M.K. Neilsen, in Proceedings of the SMTA International, (Rosemont, 2015).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Portland State UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.ERS Co.Los AltosUSA
  3. 3.Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations