Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of Solder Joint Fatigue Life Under Realistic Service Conditions

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The behavior of lead-free solder alloys under complex loading scenarios is still not well understood. Common damage accumulation rules fail to account for strong effects of variations in cycling amplitude, and random vibration test results cannot be interpreted in terms of performance under realistic service conditions. This is a result of the effects of cycling parameters on materials properties. These effects are not yet fully understood or quantitatively predictable, preventing modeling based on parameters such as strain, work, or entropy. Depending on the actual spectrum of amplitudes, Miner’s rule of linear damage accumulation has been shown to overestimate life by more than an order of magnitude, and greater errors are predicted for other combinations. Consequences may be particularly critical for so-called environmental stress screening. Damage accumulation has, however, been shown to scale with the inelastic work done, even if amplitudes vary. This and the observation of effects of loading history on subsequent work per cycle provide for a modified damage accumulation rule which allows for the prediction of life. Individual joints of four different Sn-Ag-Cu-based solder alloys (SAC305, SAC105, SAC-Ni, and SACXplus) were cycled in shear at room temperature, alternating between two different amplitudes while monitoring the evolution of the effective stiffness and work per cycle. This helped elucidate general trends and behaviors that are expected to occur in vibrations of microelectronics assemblies. Deviations from Miner’s rule varied systematically with the combination of amplitudes, the sequences of cycles, and the strain rates in each. The severity of deviations also varied systematically with Ag content in the solder, but major effects were observed for all the alloys. A systematic analysis was conducted to assess whether scenarios might exist in which the more fatigue-resistant high-Ag alloys would fail sooner than the lower-Ag ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Warren and Y. Wei, Int. J. Fatigue 32, 1853 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Wertz, C. Holycross, H. Shen, O. Scott-Emuakpor, T. George, and C. Cross, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 135, 031008-1 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Chang, T. Pimbley, and D. Conway, Exp. Mech. 8, 133 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Vaynman and A. McKeown, IEEE Trans. Compon. Hybrids Manuf. Technol. 16, 317 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Yin, L. Wentlent, L. Yang, B. Arfaei, A. Qasaimeh, and P. Borgesen, J. Electron. Mater. 41, 241 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Cuddalorepatta, A. Dasgupta, and K. Holdermann, Proc. IMECE (Boston, MA, 2008).

  7. A. Mayyas, L. Yin, and P. Borgesen, Proceedings of the ASME International (IMECE2009-12749, 2009).

  8. K. Korhonen, L. Lehman, M. Korhonen, and D. Henderson, J. Electron. Mater. 36, 173 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Arfaei, Y. Xing, J. Woods, J. Wolcott, P. Tumne, P. Borgesen, and E. Cotts, Proceedings of ECTC (2008), pp. 459–465.

  10. A. Qasaimeh, Y. Jaradat, L. Wentlent, L. Yang, L. Yin, B. Arfaei, and P. Borgesen, Proceedings of 61st ECTC (2011), pp. 1775–1781.

  11. P. Borgesen, S. Hamasha, M. Obaidat, V. Raghavan, X. Dai, M. Meilunas, and M. Anselm, Microelectron. Reliab. 53, 1587 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M.A. Miner, J. Appl. Mech. 12, A159 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Borgesen, L. Yang, B. Arfaei, L. Yin, B. Roggeman, and M. Meilunas, Proc. SMTA Pan Pacific Microelectronics Symposium (2011).

  14. L. Yang, V. Raghavan, B. Roggeman, L. Yin, and P. Borgesen, On the Complete Breakdown of Miner’s Rule for Lead Free BGA Joints (San Diego, CA: SMTA International, 2009), p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. Yang, L. Yin, B. Arfaei, B. Roggeman, and P. Borgesen, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies (2013), pp. 430–440.

  16. M. Obaidat, S. Hamasha, Y. Jaradat, A. Qasaimeh, B. Arfaei, M. Anselm, and P. Borgesen, Proc. 63rd ECTC (2013).

  17. D. Henderson, J. Woods, T. Gosselin, J. Bartelo, D. King, T. Korhonen, M. Korhonen, L. Lehman, E. Cotts, S. Kang, P. Lauro, D. Shih, C. Goldsmith, and K. Puttlitz, J. Mater. Res. 19, 1608 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Dutta, J. Electron. Mater. 32, 201 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L. Lehman, R. Kinyanjui, J. Wang, Y. Xing, L. Zavalij, P. Borgesen, and E. Cotts, Proc. ECTC (2005) pp. 674–681.

  20. T. Bieler, P. Borgesen, Y. Xing, L. Lehman, and E. Cotts, Pb-Free and RoHS-Compliant Materials and Processes for Microelectronics (MRS Spring Meeting, April 2007).

  21. T. Bieler, H. Jiang, L. Lehman, T. Kirkpatrick, E. Cotts, and B. Nandagopal, Proc. Electronic Components and Technology Conference (2008), pp. 370–381.

  22. L. Lehman, Y. Xing, T. Bieler, and E. Cotts, Acta Mater. 58, 3546 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. L. Yang, L. Yin, B. Roggeman, and P. Borgesen, Proc. 60th ECTC (2010), pp. 1518–1523.

  24. M. Matin, W. Vellinga, and M. Geers, Mater. Sci. Eng. A431, 166 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Kaechele, Review and Analysis of Cumulative-Fatigue-Damage Theories. RM-3653-PM (Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation, 1963).

  26. J. Grover, Symposium of Fatigue of Aircraft Structures, Presented at the third Pacific area national meeting (San Francisco, CA, October 1959).

  27. F. Shanley, A Theory of Fatigue Based on Unbonding During Reversed Slip (The Rand Corporation, 1952).

  28. A. Shu, H. Huang, Y. Liu, L. He, and Q. Liao, Int. J. Turbo Jet Engines 29, 79 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  29. H. Corten and T. Dolan, International Conference on Fatigue of Metals (Institution of Mechanical Engineers and American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1956).

  30. H. Liu and H. Corten, Fatigue Damage Under Varying Stress Amplitudes (NASA, 1960).

  31. A. Freudenthal and R. Heller, J. Aerosp. Sci. 26, 431 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Y. Jaradat, J. Owens, A. Qasaimeh, B. Arfaei, L. Yin, M. Anselm, and P. Borgesen, Proc. SMTA International (2012).

  33. Y. Jaradat, J. Chen, J. Owens, L. Yin, A. Qasaimeh, L. Wentlent, B. Arfaei, and P. Borgesen, Proc. ITHERM 2012, pp. 740–744.

  34. D. Kececioglu and B. Sun, Environmental Stress Screening: Its Quantification, Optimization and Management (Lancaster, PA: DEStech, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DMR 1206474, by the U.S. Department of Defense through the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP), and by the AREA Consortium. Solder spheres were provided by Alpha Advanced Materials.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sa’d Hamasha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamasha, S., Jaradat, Y., Qasaimeh, A. et al. Assessment of Solder Joint Fatigue Life Under Realistic Service Conditions. J. Electron. Mater. 43, 4472–4484 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-014-3436-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-014-3436-3

Keywords

Navigation