The β phase of tin is stable only down to 13°C. Below that temperature the thermodynamically stable phase is α tin, more commonly known as tin pest. This phase has gained notoriety because of the catastrophic consequences of the transforming metal. Interest in this subject increased after the transition from tin–lead to lead-free solder, driven by European restriction of the use of hazardous substances (RoHS) legislation. Lead-free alloys contain from 95% to 99% tin and could potentially be susceptible to the β/α transformation mentioned above. The nucleation of the α phase takes a long time to occur, months or even years, especially in alloys of tin. For this reason this phenomenon is particularly difficult to study. The growth, however, occurs faster, and this paper describes a procedure for observing and measuring growth based on electrical measurements. Furthermore, a sample preparation technique that considerably accelerates the nucleation in alloys is described. Seven binary alloys were tested with this procedure and ranked in terms of their propensity to transform. Experimental results demonstrated that the α crystal growth is not stopped by alloying, but just decelerated, and that lead and bismuth are the most effective at this. The same procedure was then demonstrated successfully on printed circuit boards and hence is shown to be a general method for monitoring α tin growth in critical field applications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
L.D. Brownlee, Nature 166, 482 (1950). doi: 10.1038/166482a0.
W.L. Williams, ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. 189, 149 (1956). doi: 10.1520/STP44117S
A. Bornemann, ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. 189, 129 (1956). doi: 10.1520/STP44116S
E.O. Hall, The Mechanism of Phase Transformations in Metals (London, UK: Institute of Metals, 1955), pp. 87–92.
W.J. Plumbridge, J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Electron. 18, 307 (2007). doi:10.1007/s10854-006-9025-3
W.J. Plumbridge, Circuit Word 33, 1 (2007). doi:10.1108/03056120710723661.
W.J. Plumbridge, J. Electron. Mater. 37, 2 (2008). doi:10.1007/s11664-007-0165-x.
K. Sweatman, S. Suenaga, and T. Nishimura, Proceedings of JEDEX (San Jose, 2005).
G.V. Raynor and R.W. Smith, Proc. Roy. Soc. 244A, 101 (1958).
J.H. Becker, J. Appl. Phys. 29, 1110 (1958). doi: 10.1063/1.1723369.
N.A. Gorynuova, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 75, 51 (1950).
R.R. Rogers and J.F. Fydell, J. Electrochem. Soc. 100, 383 (1953).
R.G. Wolfson, M.E. Fine and A.W. Ewald, J. Appl. Phys. 31, 1973 (1960).
D. Di Maio and C. Hunt, J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Electron. 20, 386 (2009). doi: 10.1007/s10854-008-9739-5
A. D. Styrkas, Inor. Mat. 39, 8 (2003).
J. Murray, D.A. Knopf and A.K. Bertram, Nature, 434, 10 (2005). doi:10.1038/434010a.
The work was carried out as part of a project in the Materials Characterisation Programme of the UK Department for Innovation, Universities, and Skills. The authors are grateful to Milos Dusek for␣useful discussions around the experimental technique.
About this article
Cite this article
Di Maio, D., Hunt, C.P. Monitoring the Growth of the α Phase in Tin Alloys by Electrical Resistance Measurements. Journal of Elec Materi 38, 1874–1880 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-009-0822-3
- Solder alloys
- electronic packaging
- allotropic transformations