Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of Air Entrainment During Pouring of an Aluminum Alloy

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding and reducing air entrainment in liquid metals is important for improving casting filling systems and liquid metal transfer processes. Air entrainment generates oxide inclusions that reduce the mechanical performance of metals. This paper presents air entrainment measurements for a jet of liquid aluminum alloy A356 plunging into a pool. Measurements are performed in argon and air atmospheres and for a range of jet fall heights. The volume ratio of entrained gas to liquid aluminum poured is measured to be equal to 0.43 for an average jet impact velocity of about 3.8 m/s in the argon atmosphere. This ratio is of a similar magnitude as for water under the same jet parameters. For the corresponding experiment in air, the measured volumetric ratio is only 0.16. It is found that nearly 50 pct of the volume of oxygen entrained is consumed by oxidation, but this alone does not account for the difference between the measurements in inert and oxidizing atmospheres. Instead, the ratio for air is so low because during some portion of the experiment no air was entrained. The onset velocity for gas entrainment for a plunging jet of liquid A356 is found to be 3.9 m/s in an air atmosphere and 3.4 m/s in argon, with the difference attributed to the stabilizing effect of the oxide film on the jet surface in air. These are about three times greater than the onset velocity previously measured for water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Chanson: Hydraulics of Dams and River Structures, 2004, London, England, pp. 3–15.

  2. [2] H. Chanson: Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2013, vol. 51(3), pp. 223-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. [3] D. A. Ervine, E. McKeogh, and E. M. Elsawy: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 1980, vol. 69(2), pp. 425-45.

    Google Scholar 

  4. [4] K. J. Sene: Chem. Engineering Science, 1998, vol. 43, pp. 2615–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D.A. Ervine and A.A. Ahmed: Paper E1, International Conference on Hydraulic Modeling of Civil Engineering Structures, Coventry, England, 1982.

  6. T. Brattberg and H. Chanson: Chem. Engineering Science, 1998, vol. 53(24), pp. 4113-27.

  7. E. Sande and J. M. Smith: Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 31, pp. 219-24 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. K. Biń: Chem. Engineering Science, 1993, vol. 48, pp. 3585-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Wanstall, J. Griffin, and C.E. Bates: Paper No. 1.1, Proceedings of the 47th Steel Founders’ Society of America (SFSA) Technical and Operating Conference, Chicago, IL, 1993.

  10. C.E. Bates and J. Griffin: Research Report No. 106, SFSA Crystal Lake, IL, 1994.

  11. [11] J. Ciborowski and A. Bin: Int. Chem. (Polish), 1972, vol. 2, pp. 453-69.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. [12] R. Gopalan and N. K. Prabhu: Material Science and Technology, 2011, vol. 27(12), pp. 1757-69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. [13] J. Campbell: Complete Casting Handbook: Metal Casting Processes, Techniques and Design, Elsevier Science & Technology, Oxford, UK, 2011, pp. 19-77.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. JMatPro, Sente Software Ltd, Surrey Technology Center, Surrey GU2 7YG, United Kingdom.

  15. ASME Test Uncertainty, PTC 19.1-2005, American Society of Mechanical Engineering, New York, NY.

  16. MAGMAsoft, MAGMA Gmbh, Kackerstrasse 11, 52072 Aachen, Germany.

  17. [17] T. Campbell, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, and P. Vashishta: Physical Review Letters, 1999 vol. 82(24), pp. 4866-69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. [18] J. P. Anson, R. A. L. Drew, and J. E. Gruzleski: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 1999, vol. 30(6), pp. 1027-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. [19] N. B. Vargaftik, B. N. Volkov, and L. D. Voljak: Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 1983 vol. 12(3), pp. 817-20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank David Weiss, Dan Hoefert, and the rest of the team at Eck Industries for providing the use of their foundry and support during the aluminum experiments. F.V. Guerra acknowledges CONACYT for the scholarship provided to him during his postdoctoral work at the University of Iowa and the Metallurgical and Materials Research Institute of the Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo for supporting the application. This American Metalcasting Consortium (AMC) project is sponsored by the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, Philadelphia, PA and the Defense Logistics Agency Information Operations, J68, Research & Development, Ft. Belvoir, VA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Beckermann.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Manuscript submitted June 2, 2020; accepted October 2, 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guerra, F.V., Archer, L., Hardin, R.A. et al. Measurement of Air Entrainment During Pouring of an Aluminum Alloy. Metall Mater Trans B 52, 123–137 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-020-01998-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-020-01998-3

Navigation