Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Steel Cleanliness in a Steel Deoxidized Using Al

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of magnesium in the aluminum used as a deoxidizer on the cleanliness of steel was studied throughout a steelmaking route for the production of thin slabs. Two deoxidizers with different Mg contents were used. The Mg content of a “typical” deoxidizer was ~0.5 wt pct Mg, whereas that for an alternative deoxidizer was ~2 wt pct Mg. The inclusion population at different stages of the steelmaking process was characterized in terms of chemical composition, number, and size distribution. The inclusion modification path shows that the solid Al2O3 and Al2O3-MgO inclusions formed in the early stage of the steel ladle treatment are modified into Al2O3-MgO-CaO liquid and MgO-Al2O3-liquid inclusions. Although some slight differences were observed in the ladle furnace samples, the chemical composition of inclusions was similar in the samples taken at the mold of the continuous casting, regardless of the deoxidizer used. Gumbel, generalized extreme value (GEV), and generalized Pareto (GP) distributions were used for the description of the size distribution. The GEV and GP distributions resulted in proper distributions to describe the evolution of size distribution throughout the steelmaking process. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences between inclusion size distributions resulting from the use of either deoxidizer were found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Kaushik, J. Lehmann and M. Nadif, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2012, vol. 43, pp. 710-725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E.B. Pretorius, H.G. Oltmann and B.T. Schart, An Overview of Steel Cleanliness From an Industry Perspective, in Aistech Conference Proceedings, 2013.

  3. L.A. Frank, Castability—From Alumina to Spinels (and More), in 2001 Steelmaking Conference Proceedings, 2001.

  4. G. Gao, M. Long, Y. Wang, X. Zuo and L. Zhang, Inclusions and Nozzle Clogging during Billet Continuous Casting Process, in Materials Science & Technology 2009 Conference and Exhibition, 2009.

  5. E.B. Pretorious, H.G. Oltmann and T. Cash, Iron Steel Technol., 2010, vol 7, pp. 31-44.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Zhang, Y. Min, C. Liu and M. Jian, ISIJ Int., 2015, vol. 55, pp. 1541-1548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. V. Atkinson and G. Shi, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2003, vol. 48, pp. 457-520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ASTM E2283-03, Standard Practice for Extreme Value Analysis of Nonmetallic Inclusions in Steel and Other Microstructural Features, ASTM International (2003).

  9. Y. Murakami,, J. Res. Nat. Inst. Stand. Technol,1994, vol. 99, pp. 345-351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Murakami, Metal Fatigue: Effects of Small Defects and Nonmetallic Inclusions, Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford UK, (2002), 321.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Beretta and Y. Murakami, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2001, vol. 32, pp. 517-523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Kanbe, A. Karasev, H. Todoroki and P. G. Jönsson, ISIJ Int., 2011, vol. 51, pp. 2056-2063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Ekengren and J. Bergström, Extremes, 2012, vol. 15, pp. 257-265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C. W. Anderson, G. Shi, H. V. Atkinson and C. M. Sellars, Acta Mater., 2000, vol. 48, pp. 4235-4246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Shi, H. V. Atkinson, C. M. Sellars and C. W. Anderson, Acta Mater., 1999, vol. 47, pp. 1455-1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Shi, H. V. Atkinson, C. M. Sellars and C. W. Anderson, Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2000, vol. 27, pp. 355-360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Shi, H. V. Atkinson, M. Sellars and C. W. Anderson, Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2000, vol. 27, pp. 361-366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Beretta and Y. Murakami, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1998, vol. 21, pp. 1049-1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. T. W. Anderson and D. A. Darling, “A test of goodness of fit,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1954, vol. 49, pp. 765-769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, 04 2012. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda35e.htm. Accessed 30 Apr 2014.

  21. W.S. Rasband, ImageJ and B. M. U. U.S. National Institutes of Health, ImageJ, Image Processing and Analysis in Java, 1997-2014. http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.

  22. J. O. Andersson, T. Helander, L. Höglund, P. F. Shi and B. Sundman, Calphad, 2002, vol. 26, pp. 273-312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martín Herrera-Trejo.

Additional information

Manuscript submitted on August 26, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castro-Cedeño, EI., Herrera-Trejo, M., Castro-Román, M. et al. Evaluation of Steel Cleanliness in a Steel Deoxidized Using Al. Metall Mater Trans B 47, 1613–1625 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-016-0640-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-016-0640-y

Keywords

Navigation