Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 1000–1009 | Cite as

Study of Organic and Inorganic Binders on Strength of Iron Oxide Pellets

  • Urvashi Srivastava
  • S. Komar Kawatra
  • Timothy C. Eisele
Article

Abstract

Bentonite is a predominant binder used in iron ore pelletization. However, the presence of a high content of silica and alumina in bentonite is considered undesirable for ironmaking operations. The objective of this study was to identify the alternatives of bentonite for iron ore pelletization. To achieve this goal, different types of organic and inorganic binders were utilized to produce iron oxide pellets. The quality of these iron oxide pellets was compared with pellets made using bentonite. All pellets were tested for physical strength at different stages of pelletization to determine their ability to survive during shipping and handling. The results show that organic binders such as lactose monohydrate, hemicellulose, and sodium lignosulfonate can provide sufficient strength to indurated pellets.

References

  1. 1.
    S.J. Ripke: Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Boston, MA, 2002, pp. 201.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K.H. Meyer: Pelletizing of Iron Ore, Springer, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Montmorillonite Mineral data, http://webmineral.com/data/Montmorillonite.shtml, 2011.
  4. 4.
    J. Schmitt: 66 th Annual University of Minnesota Mining Symposium, Duluth, MN, 2005.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W.T. Lankford, N.L. Samways, R.F. Craven, and H.E. McGannon: The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel, 10th ed., The AISE Steel Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.H. Heerema, H. Kortmann, T. Kater, and V.C. Boogard: 5 th International Symposium on Agglomeration, Brighton, U.K., 1989, p. 227.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T.C. Eisele and S.K. Kawatra: Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 2003, vol. 24 (1).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Qui, T. Jiang, H. Li, and D. Wang: Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 2003, vol. 224(1–3).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.K. Kawatra, T.C. Eisele, J.A. Gurtler, C.A. Hardison, and K. Lewandowski: USDOE, Semiannual Technical Progress Report: 29, Michigan Tech University, Houghton, Boston, MA, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.V. Chambers and A. Ferretti: J. Dairy Sci., 1978, vol 62 (1), pp. 112–16.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Ferretti and J.V. Chambers: J. Agr. Food Chem., 1979, vol. 27, pp. 687-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    V.M. Chizhikova, R.M. Vainshtein, S.N. Zorin, T.I. Zainetdinov, G.A. Zinyagin, and A.A. Shevchenko: Metallurgist, 2003, vol. 47, pp. 141-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Lepp: Am. Min., 1957, vol. 42, pp. 679–81.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    L.A. Hass, J.A. Aldinger, and R.K. Zahl: Bureau of Mines, Report on 9230, 1989, p. 21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Urvashi Srivastava
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Komar Kawatra
    • 3
  • Timothy C. Eisele
    • 3
  1. 1.Michigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA
  2. 2.Research & Development Technology CenterMidrex TechnologiesPinevilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Chemical EngineeringMichigan Technological UniversityHoughton USA

Personalised recommendations