Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Laser Processing Strategy and Remelting on Surface Structure and Porosity Development during Selective Laser Melting of a Metallic Material

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

316L samples were fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM) with different laser powers and scanning strategies/patterns. The porosity distribution and surface structures of the as-fabricated samples were characterized using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. This combined with a mathematical modeling of the SLM process aims to understand the formation mechanism of pores in a newly built layer and the role of remelting of previous layers on internal porosity development. It is shown that the surface structure and the formation of pores in a newly built layer are mainly associated with melt flow behavior, but the formation of pores within bulk samples, particularly those at interlayer interfaces, were largely dictated by the extent of remelting of previous layers during SLM. Laser melting of a powder layer tends to develop rough surfaces and open pores on the uppermost layer. With laser remelting of a newly built layer, the sample surfaces become much smoother and the pores within the uppermost layer can be completely eliminated. During SLM processing, sufficient remelting of previous layers leads to development of good bonding at the interlayer interfaces, whereas less extent of remelting of previous layers results in an increased number of pores at the interlayer interfaces. Laser power or energy density shows a much more dominant role than the laser scanning strategy in porosity development, which is attributed to the fact that laser power or energy density shows greater influence on the extent of remelting as compared with the latter. The mechanism on how remelting affects the evolution of pores is also demonstrated through modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C.L. Qiu, C. Panwisawas, M. Ward, H.C. Basoalto, J.W. Brooks, and M.M. Attallah: Acta Mater., 2015, vol. 96, pp. 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S.A. Khairallah, A.T. Anderson, A. Rubenchik, and W.E. King: Acta Mater., 2016, vol. 108, pp. 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M.J. Matthews, G. Guss, S.A. Khairallah, A.M. Rubenchik, P.J. Depond, and W.E. King: Acta Mater., 2016, vol. 114, pp. 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C.L.A. Leung, S. Marussi, R.C. Atwood, M. Towrie, P.J. Withers, and P.D. Lee: Nat. Commun., 2018, vol. 9, p. 1355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Zhao, K. Fezzaa, R.W. Cunningham, H. Wen, F. Carlo, L. Chen, A.D. Rollett, and T. Sun: Sci. Rep., 2017, 7, 3602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C.L. Qiu, N.J.E. Adkins, and M.M. Attallah: Acta Mater., 2016, vol. 103, pp. 382–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Yasa and J.-P. Kruth: Proc. Eng., 2011, vol. 19, pp. 389–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C.L. Qiu, G.A. Ravi, C. Dance, A. Ranson, S. Dilworth, and M.M. Attallah: J. Alloys Compd., 2015, vol. 629, pp. 351–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Z.J. Sun, X.P. Tan, S.B. Tor, and W.Y. Yeong: Mater. Des., 2016, vol. 104, pp. 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M.M. Ma, Z.M. Wang, and X.Y. Zeng: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, vol. 685, pp. 265–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Wang, C.H. Song, Y.Q. Yang, and Y.C. Bai: Mater. Des., 2016, vol. 100, pp. 291–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C.L. Qiu, N.J.E. Adkins, and M.M. Attallah: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2013, vol. 578, pp. 230–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C.L. Qiu, Y. Sheng, N.J.E. Adkins, M. Ward, H. Hassanin, M.M. Attallah, P.D. Lee, and P.J. Withers: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, vol. 628, pp. 188–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. N. Read, W. Wang, K. Essa, and M.M. Attallah: Mater. Des., 2015, vol. 65, pp. 417–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M.J. Xia, D.D. Gu, G.Q. Yu, D.H. Dai, H.Y. Chen, and Q.M. Shi: Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2017, vol. 116, pp. 96–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Thijs, K. Kempen, J.-P. Kruth, and J.V. Humbeeck: Acta Mater., 2013, vol. 61, pp. 1809–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Thijs, F. Verhaeghe, T. Craeghs, J.V. Humbeeck, and J.-P. Kruth: Acta Mater., 2010, vol. 58, pp. 3303–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Rashid, S.H. Masood, D. Ruan, S. Palanisamy, R.A. Rashid, M. Brand: J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 2017, 249:502–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Catchpole-Smith, N. Aboulkhair, L. Parry, C. Tuck, I.A. Ashcroft, and A. Clare: Addit. Manuf., 2017, vol. 15, pp. 113–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C.L. Qiu, M.A. Kindi, A.S. Aladawi, and I.A. Hatmi: Sci. Rep., 2018, vol. 8, p. 7785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. B. Chinè and M. Monno: Proc. 2010 Eur. COMSOL Conf., Paris, 2010.

  22. H.A. Amiri and A.A. Hamouda: Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 2013, vol. 52, pp. 22–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Z. Liu and J.G. Korvink: Eng. Optimiz., 2008, vol. 40, pp. 529–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Kim: Commun. Comput. Phys., 2012, vol. 12, pp. 613–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. C. Liu and J. Shen: Physica D: Nonlin. Phenom., 2003, vol. 179, pp. 211–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. C. Multiphysics, “4.3 User’s Guide,” 2012.

  27. C.L. Qiu, A. Fones, H.G.C. Hamilton, N.J.E. Adkins, and M.M. Attallah: Mater. Des., 2016, vol. 109, pp. 98–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. M. Tang, P.C. Pistorius, and J.L. Beuth: Addit. Manuf., 2017, vol. 14, pp. 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The current work was sponsored by the incentive fundings from the School of Engineering, Cardiff University, and the School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beihang University. ZW and LC acknowledge the financial support by the program of the ORAU Ralph E. Powe Junior Faculty Enhancement Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunlei Qiu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Manuscript submitted October 30, 2018.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiu, C., Wang, Z., Aladawi, A.S. et al. Influence of Laser Processing Strategy and Remelting on Surface Structure and Porosity Development during Selective Laser Melting of a Metallic Material. Metall Mater Trans A 50, 4423–4434 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-019-05348-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-019-05348-0

Navigation