Abstract
Present work describes the flow behavior of tungsten heavy alloys with nominal compositions 90W-7Ni-3Fe, 93W-4.9Ni-2.1Fe, and 95W-3.5Ni-1.5Fe (wt pct) produced by CIPing and gelcasting routes. The overall microstructural features of gelcasting are finer than those of CIPing alloys. Both the grain size of W and corresponding contiguity values increase with increase in W content in the present alloys. The volume fraction of matrix phase decreases with increase in W content in both the alloys. The lattice parameter values of the matrix phase also increase with increase in W content. The yield strength (σYS) continuously increases with increase in W content in both the alloys. The σYS values of CIPing alloys are marginally higher than those of gelcasting at constant W. The ultimate tensile strength (σUTS) and elongation values are maximum at intermediate W content. Present alloys exhibit two slopes in true stress–true plastic strain curves in low and high strain regimes and follow a characteristic Ludwigson relation. The two slopes are associated with two deformation mechanisms that are occurring during tensile deformation. The overall nature of differential curves of all the alloys is different and these curves contain three distinctive stages of work hardening (I, II, and III). This suggests varying deformation mechanisms during tensile testing due to different volume fractions of constituent phases. The slip is the predominant deformation mechanism of the present alloys during tensile testing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Upadhyaya: Material Chemistry and Physics, 2001, vol. 67, pp. 101-110.
W. Lanz, W. Odermett, G. Whelraunch: Kinetic energy projectiles: development history, state of the art, trends, 19th International Symposium on blastic, Interlaken, Switzerland. 2001.
Y. Sahin: Journal of Powder Technology, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/764306.
C. Heeman, M. Susan, Abkowitz: Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2005, vol.390, pp. 62-66.
Zhang Ke, Ge Chang Chun: Materials Science Forum, 2007, vols. 534-536, pp. 1285-1288.
A.C. Young, O.O. Omatete, M.A. Janney, P.A. Menchhofer: J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1991, vol. 74 (3), pp. 612-618.
M.A. Janney: U.S. Pat. No. 4,894,194, 1990.
M.A. Janney and O.O. Omatete: U.S. Pat. No. 5,028,362, 1991.
O.O. Omatete, M.A. Janney, and R.A. Strehlow: American Ceramic Society Bulletin, 1991, vol. 70(10), pp. 1641-1649.
A. Panchal and U. Ravi Kiran: Tech. Rep., DRDO-DMRL-PMG-094, 2015
H.S. Song and E.P. Kim: U.S. Pat. No. 5,956,559, 1999.
K.T. Ramesh, R.S. Coates: Metall. Trans. A, 1992, vol. 23A, pp. 2625-2630.
X. Gong, J.L. Fan, F. Ding: Int. J. Refract. Hard Mater, 2012, vol. 30, pp. 71-77.
U. Ravi Kiran, A. Panchal, M. Sankarnarayana, T.K. Nandy: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, vol. 640, pp. 82-90
ASTM E8M-04, Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 2005, vol. 03.01, pp. 86–109.
K. Eun-Pyo, H. Moon-Hee, H.I. Moon: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1999, vol. 30A, pp. 627-632.
R.M. German, A. Bose and S.S. Mani: Metall. Trans. A, 1992, vol. 23A, pp. 211-219.
R.M. German, L.L. Bourguignon, B.H. Rabin: J. Met., 1985, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 36-39.
A. Kumari, M. Sankarnarayana, T.K. Nandy: Int. J. Refract. Hard Mater, 2017, Vol. 67, pp. 18-31.
R.M. German: Metall. Trans. A, 1985, vol. 16A, pp. 1247–1252.
S. Humail, F. Akhtar, S.J. Askari: Int. J. Refract. Hard Mater, 2007, Vol. 25, pp. 380–385.
M. Yousuf, P.C. Sahu, H.K. Jajoo, S. Rajagopalan and K. GovindRajan: J. Phys. F, 1986, vol. 16, pp. 373-380.
L. Delehouzee, A. Deruyttere: Acta metall., 1967, vol. 15, pp. 727-734.
B. Katavic, Z. Odanovic, M. Burzic: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, vol. 492, pp. 337–345.
M.F. Ashby: Philos. Mag., 1970, vol. 21, pp. 399-424.
S.H. Hong and H.J. Ryu: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2003, vol. 344, no. 1-2, pp. 253–260.
R.M. German and L.L. Bourguignon: Proc. Semin. Powder Metall. Def. Technol. 1984, pp. 117–131.
J. Das, U. Ravi Kiran, N. EswaraPrasad: Int. J. Refract. Hard Mater, 2009, Vol. 27, pp. 577-583.
U. Ravi Kiran, A. Panchal, T.K. Nandy: Int. J. Refract. Hard Mater, 2013, Vol. 37, pp. 1-11.
K.S. Churn, R.M. German: Metall. Trans. A, 1984, vol. 15A, pp. 331– 338.
G.E. Dieter: Mechanical Metallurgy, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988.
D.C. Ludwigson: Metall. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, pp. 2825-2828.
S. Banumathy, R.K. Mandal, and A.K. Singh: Int. J. Mat. Res., 2011, vol. 102, pp. 208-217.
K. K. Mehta, P. Mukhopadhyay, R. K. Mandal, and A. K. Singh: Mater. Char., 2015, vol. 110, pp. 175-191.
K. K. Mehta, P. Mukhopadhyay, R. K. Mandal and A. K. Singh: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2014, vol. 45, pp. 3493–3504.
C.W. Shao, F. Shi, W.W. Guo and X.W. Li: Metall. Trans., 2015, vol. 56, pp. 46 – 53.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by DRDO and The Director, Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory for his kind encouragements. The authors also thank members of Analytical Chemistry, Electron Microscopy, Mechanical Behavior, Mechanical Engineering, and Powder Metallurgy Groups of DMRL for their kind help.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Manuscript submitted November 2, 2017.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Panchal, A., Ravi Kiran, U., Nandy, T.K. et al. Tensile Flow Behavior of Tungsten Heavy Alloys Produced by CIPing and Gelcasting Routes. Metall Mater Trans A 49, 2084–2098 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-018-4590-7
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-018-4590-7