Relationships Between Smelter Grade Alumina Characteristics and Strength Determined by Nanoindentation and Ultrasound-Mediated Particle Breakage
- 208 Downloads
The mechanical strength of smelter grade alumina (SGA) is of considerable practical significance for the aluminum reduction process. Attrition of alumina during transportation and handling generates an increased level of fines. This results in generation of dust, poor flow properties, and silo segregation that interfere with alumina feeding systems. These lead to process instabilities which in turn result in current efficiency losses that are costly. Here we are concerned with developing a fundamental understanding of SGA strength in terms of its microstructure. Nanoindentation and ultrasound-mediated particle breakage tests have been conducted to study the strength. Strength of SGA samples both industry calcined and laboratory prepared, decrease with increasing α-alumina (corundum) content contrary to expectation. The reducing strength of alumina with increasing degree of calcination is attributed to the development of a macroporous and abrasion-prone microstructure resulting from the ‘pseudomorphic’ transformation of precursor gibbsite during the calcination process.
KeywordsGibbsite Environmental Scan Electron Microscopy Particle Breakage Transition Alumina Particle Size Distribution Measurement
The authors acknowledge the generous support of Outotec GmbH.
- 1.World Aluminium: http://www.world-aluminium.org/statistics/alumina-production/#data, (2016). Accessed 10 October 2016.
- 3.J. Metson, P. Lavoie, L. Perander, R. Etzion, Chemistry in New Zealand, 2010, vol. 74, pp. 96-100.Google Scholar
- 4.K. Wefers, C. Misra, Oxides and Hydroxides of Aluminium, Alcoa Laboratories, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
- 6.L.M. Perander, Evolution of Nano and Microstructure During the Calcination of Bayer Gibbsite. PhD Thesis, The University of Auckland, 2010.Google Scholar
- 8.K. Yamada, T. Harato, S. Hamano, K. Horinouchi, Light Metals, TMS, Warrendale, 1984.Google Scholar
- 10.L.M. Perander, J.B. Metson, C. Klett, Light Metals, TMS, San Diego, 2011. pp. 151-154.Google Scholar
- 11.S. Chandrashekar, D. Jackson, J. Kisler: Proc. of the 7th International Alumina Quality Workshop, 2005.Google Scholar
- 13.L.T. Kristiansen, A.K. Prytz, E. Tveten: Proc. of the 9th International Alumina Quality Workshop, 2012.Google Scholar
- 16.A. Saatci, H.-W. Schmidt, W. Stockhausen, M. Stroder, P. Strum, Light Metals, TMS, 2004, pp. 81–86.Google Scholar
- 18.G.I. Roach, J.B. Cornell, B.J. Griffin, Light Metals, TMS, Warrendale, 1998, pp. 153-158.Google Scholar
- 21.P. Kippax, Paint and Coatings Industry Magazine, (2005).Google Scholar
- 31.NanoScience Instruments: http://www.nanoscience.com/technology/mechanical-testing-technology/mechanical-properties/elastic-modulus-and-hardness/, (2016). Accessed 17 October 2016.
- 36.L.M. Perander, M.A. Stam, M.M. Hyland, J.B. Metson, Light Metals, TMS, Warrendale, 2011, pp. 285- 290.Google Scholar