• Symposium: Additive Manufacturing: Building the Pathway to Process and Material Qualification
  • Published:

Powder Bed Layer Characteristics: The Overseen First-Order Process Input

Abstract

Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing offers unique advantages in terms of manufacturing cost, lot size, and product complexity compared to traditional processes such as casting, where a minimum lot size is mandatory to achieve economic competitiveness. Many studies—both experimental and numerical—are dedicated to the analysis of how process parameters such as heat source power, scan speed, and scan strategy affect the final material properties. Apart from the general urge to increase the build rate using thicker powder layers, the coating process and how the powder is distributed on the processing table has received very little attention to date. This paper focuses on the first step of every powder bed build process: Coating the process table. A numerical study is performed to investigate how powder is transferred from the source to the processing table. A solid coating blade is modeled to spread commercial Ti-6Al-4V powder. The resulting powder layer is analyzed statistically to determine the packing density and its variation across the processing table. The results are compared with literature reports using the so-called “rain” models. A parameter study is performed to identify the influence of process table displacement and wiper velocity on the powder distribution. The achieved packing density and how that affects subsequent heat source interaction with the powder bed is also investigated numerically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fiag. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

References

  1. 1.

    I. Yadroitsev: Selective Laser Melting, LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    C.D. Boley, S.A. Khairallah and M.A. Rubenchik: Appl. Optics, 2015, vol. 54, pp. 2477–2482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    A. Rubenchik, S. Wu, S. Mitchell, I. Golosker, M. LeBlanc and M. Peterson: Appl. Optics, 2015, vol. 54, no. 24, pp. 7230–7233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    C. Körner, E. Attar and P. Heinl: J. Mat. Proc., 2011, vol. 211, pp. 978-987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    C. Körner, A. Bauereiß, E. Attar, Modeling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 21, no. 085011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    N. N’Dri, H.-W. Mindt, B. Shula, M. Megahed, A.D. Peralta, J. Neumann, P. Kantzos: TMS 2015 Supplemental proceedings, Wiley, New Jersey, 2015, p. 338.

  7. 7.

    H.-W. Mindt, M. Megahed, A.D. Peralta, J. Neumann: (2015) DMLM models: 22nd International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines - ISABE, 25–30, Phoenix.

  8. 8.

    H.-W. Mindt and M. Megahed, B. Shula, A. Peralta and J. Neumann: AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, San Diego. In: AIAA 2016-1657.

  9. 9.

    J. Ding, P. Colegrove, J. Mehnen, S. Ganguly, P.M. Sequeira Alemeida and F. Wang: Comp. Mater. Sci., 2011, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 3315-3322.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    R. Martikanitz, P. Michaleris, T. Palmer, T. DeRoy, Z.K.Liu and R. Otis: Additive Manufacturing, 2014, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 52-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    L. Papadakis, A. Loizou, J. Risse and J. Schrage: Procedia CIRP., 2014, vol. 18, pp. 90–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    L. Papadakis, A. Loizou, J. Risse, S. Bremen and J. Schrage: Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 2014, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 17-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    N. Keller and V. Ploshikhin: 1st international symposium on material science and technology of additive manufacturing, 2014, Bremen.

  14. 14.

    N. Keller and V. Ploshikhin: Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 2014, Austin, Texas.

  15. 15.

    J.C. Heigl, P. Michaleris and E.W. Reutzel: Additive Manufacturing, 2015, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 9-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    E.R. Denlinger, J.C. Heigl and P. Michaleris: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2014, vol. 1, pp. 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    P. Michaleris: Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2014, vol. 86, pp. 51-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    J.A. Slotwinski, E.J. Garboczi, P.E. Stutzman, C.F. Ferraris, S.S. Watson and M.A. Peltz: J. Res. of National Institue of Standards and Technology, 2014, vol. 119, pp. 460–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    J.A. Slotwinski and E.J. Garboczi: Jour. of Mat., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 538-543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    P.A. Cundall and O.D.L. Strack: Geotechnique, 1979, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 47-65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    M.A.J. Holmes: A numerical simulation of particulate distribution of the blast furnace raw materials burden through the Paul Worth bell-less top apparatus, 2015, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Swansea.

  22. 22.

    M. Holmes, R. Brown, P. Wauters, N. Lavery and S. Brown: App. Math. Mod: 2015, vol. 40, no. 5-6, pp. 3655-3670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    E. Attar: Simulation der selektiven Elektronenstrahlschmelzprozesse, 2011, Ph.D. Thesis, Erlangen.

  24. 24.

    I. Kovaleva, O. Kovalev and I. Smurov: Physics Procedia, 2014, vol. 56, pp. 400-410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    W.E. King, A.T. Anderson, R.M. Ferencz, N.E. Hodge, C. Kamath and S.A. Khairallah: Applied Physics Reviews, 2015, vol. 2, 041304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    P. Meaking and R. Jullien: J. Physique, 1987, vol. 48, pp. 1651-1662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    G. Metcalfe and M. Shattuck: Physica A, 1996, vol. 233, pp. 709-717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the European Commission 7th Framework Program AMAZE. The authors would like to also thank project partners and collaborators for the ongoing discussions, support, and motivation.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Megahed.

Additional information

Manuscript submitted November 18, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mindt, H.W., Megahed, M., Lavery, N.P. et al. Powder Bed Layer Characteristics: The Overseen First-Order Process Input. Metall Mater Trans A 47, 3811–3822 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3470-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Packing Density
  • Discrete Element Method
  • Powder Layer
  • Processing Table
  • Powder Size Distribution