Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Grain Size on Springback and System Energy in Micro V-Bending with Phosphor Bronze Foil

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the effect of grain size on springback in the micro V-bending process of phosphor bronze foil (face-centered cubic structure) is investigated. Grain size effect is expressed by the ratio of material thickness (T) to average grain size (D), and these T/D values are divided into three groups: larger than 1, less than 1, and approximately equal to 1. It has been found that springback angles were the lowest when T/D ≈ 1. Electron backscattering diffraction (EBSD) measurement results show that the twinning boundaries change with the ratios of T/D before and after bending. When T/D > 1, the high relative frequency of Σ3 implies that the specimen has a high system energy, which can result in large springback behavior. The equal relative frequencies of Σ3 for specimens with three ratios also prove that twinning boundaries can be regarded as an indicator of system energy. The effect of grain size on grain reorientation during bending is also discussed, and it was found that the least quantities of high surface energy {110} planes in the T/D ≈ 1 material could contribute to the least springback angles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frank Vollertsen, Production Engineering 2008, vol. 2, pp. 377-83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M Geiger, M Kleiner, R Eckstein, N Tiesler and U Engel, CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol.2001, vol. 50, pp. 445-62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. U Engel and R Eckstein, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2002, vol. 125, pp. 35-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Vollertsen, H. Schulzeniehoff and Z. Hu, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf 2006, vol. 46, pp. 1172-179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. MW Fu and WL Chan, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, vol. 67, pp. 2411-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. AP Karafillis and MC Boyce, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 1992, vol. 34, pp. 113-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A.P. Karafillis and M.C. Boyce, Int J Mach Tools Manuf 1996, vol. 36, pp. 503-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. KP Li, WP Carden and RH Wagoner, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2002, vol. 44, pp. 103-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. WD Carden, LM Geng, DK Matlock and RH Wagoner, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2002, vol. 44, pp. 79-101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. RM Cleveland and AK Ghosh, Int. J. Plast. 2002, vol. 18, pp. 769-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jenn-Terng Gau, Chris Principe and Miao Yu, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2007, vol. 191, pp. 7-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. JG Liu, MW Fu, J Lu and WL Chan, Comput. Mater. Sci. 2011, vol. 50, pp. 2604-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhi Fang, Zhengyi Jiang, Dongbin Wei and Xianghua Liu, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2014, vol. 78, pp. 1075-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Satyapriya Gupta, Anxin Ma and Alexander Hartmaier, Comput. Mater. Sci. 2015, vol. 101, pp. 201-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cho-Pei Jiang and Chang-Cheng Chen, Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2012, vol. 27, pp. 512-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang-Cheng Chen and Cho-Pei Jiang, Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2011, vol. 26, pp. 78-83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jilai Wang, Mingwang Fu and Jiaqi Ran, Advanced Engineering Materials 2014, vol. 16, pp. 421-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A Diehl, U Engel and M Geiger, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. B: J. Eng. Manuf. 2008, vol. 222, pp. 83-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lifei Wang, Guangsheng Huang, Tingzhuang Han, Ehsan Mostaed, Fusheng Pan and Maurizio Vedani, Materials & Design 2015, vol. 68, pp. 80-87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lifei Wang, Guangsheng Huang, Fusheng Pan and Maurizo Vedani, Mater. Lett. 2015, vol. 143, pp. 44-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Z. Ma, G.Q. Tong, F. Chen, Q. Wang and S. Wang, Journal J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2015, vol. 224, pp. 11-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ch V Kopezky, V Yu Novikov, LK Fionova and NA Bolshakova, Acta Metallurgica 1985, vol. 33, pp. 873-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stokes RJ, Fennell Evans D (1997) Fundamentals of Interfacial Engineering. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  24. LD Marks, J. Cryst. Growth 1983, vol. 61, pp. 556-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Australia Research Council (ARC) for its financial support. The authors also acknowledge the technical assistance from Dr. Mitchell Nancarrow from UOW Electron Microscope Centre (EMC). The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge the help of Dr. Madeleine Strong Cincotta in the final language editing of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengyi Jiang.

Additional information

Manuscript submitted September 25, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fang, Z., Jiang, Z., Wang, X. et al. Effect of Grain Size on Springback and System Energy in Micro V-Bending with Phosphor Bronze Foil. Metall Mater Trans A 47, 488–493 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-015-3247-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-015-3247-z

Keywords

Navigation