Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Chemical Composition and Heat Treatment Conditions on Stacking Fault Energy for Fe-Cr-Ni Austenitic Stainless Steel

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to establish more reliable formulae for calculating stacking fault energies (SFE) from the chemical compositions of austenitic stainless steels, SFE values were measured for 54 laboratory-melted heats and 2 commercial heats. The results were checked against those of a first-principle, atomistic calculation approach. More than ~20,000 data points for the width and angle of the Burgers vectors were determined from dark-field images of isolated extended dislocations in 56 heats of austenitic stainless steel using weak electron beams with g-3g diffraction conditions. Based on these numerous observations and on fundamental thermodynamic analyses, it is concluded that the SFE values for austenitic stainless steels are changed not only by chemical composition but also by heat treatment. In this paper, new formulae for calculating SFE values from the chemical compositions in three different heat treatment conditions have been proposed for austenitic stainless steels within given limited chemical composition ranges. In these formulae, the SFE values are calculated from the nickel, chromium, molybdenum, silicon, manganese, nitrogen, and carbon contents for the each heat treatment condition. The three heat treatment conditions studied were water cooling after solution heat treating (SHTWC), furnace cooling after solution heat treating, and aging after SHTWC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H.C. Rogers (1967) Ductility. American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, pp. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.E. Schramm, R.P. Reed: Metall. Trans. A, 1975, vol. 6A, pp. 1345 -1351.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. W. Karlsen, G. Diego, B. Devrient (2010) J. Nucl Mater 406:138–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Suzuki: Sci. Rep. Res. Inst. Tohoku Univ., 1952, vol. A4, pp. 455.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Suzuki: Dislocations and Mechanical Properties of Crystals, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1957, pp. 361–90.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.M. Latanision, A.W. Ruff, Jr. (1971) Metall. Trans. 2:505–09.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. C.G. Rhodes, A.W. Thompson: Metall. Trans. A, 1977, vol. 8A, pp. 1901–06.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. P.J. Brofman, G.S. Ansell: Metall. Trans. A, 1978, vol. 9A, pp. 879–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. E.B. Pickering (1984). Stainless Steel ‘84. The Institute of Metals, London, pp. 2–28.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.E. Stoltz, J.B. Vandersande: Metall. Trans. A, 1980, vol. 11A, pp. 1033–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Dulieu, J. Nutting: Metallurgical developments in high-alloy steels, Special report no.86. London, The Iron and Steel Institute, 1964, pp.140.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Vitos, J-O. Nilsson, B. Johansson: Acta Materialia, 2006, vol. 54, pp. 3821–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. K.H. Lo, C.H. Shek, J.K.L. Lai: Mater. Sci. Eng. R, 2009, vol. 65, pp. 39–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. F. Pettinari, J. Douin, G. Saada, P. Caron, A. Coujon, N. Clement: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2002, vol. A325, pp. 511–19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. E.R. Gilbert, J.P. Foster: J. Nucl. Mater., 2002, vol. 300, pp. 321–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Kibey, J.B Liu, M.J. Curtis, D.D. Johnson, H. Sehitoglu: Acta Materialia, 2006, vol. 54, pp. 2991–3001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu. N. Petrov (2003) Z. Metallkd 94:1012–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. V. Gavriljuk, Yu. Petrov, B. Shanina (2006) Scripta Mater. 55, pp. 537–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. D.J.H. Cockayne, M.L. Jenkins, I.L.F. Ray: Philosophical Magazine, 1971, vol. 24, pp. 1383–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. J.P. Perdew, J.A. Chevary, S.H. Vosko, K.A. Jackson, M.R. Pederson, D.J. Singh, C. Fiolhais: Phys. Rev. B, 1992, vol. 46, pp. 6671–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. A.P. Midownik (1978) CALPHAD 2:207–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Dick, T. Hickel and J. Neugebauer (2009) Steel Res. Int. 80:603–08.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A part of this study was performed as a section of the collaboration research program which was financially supported by the Tokyo Electric Power Company. Another part of this study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 22360396. The authors would like to acknowledge their financial support. For the calculation of SFE values, Associate Professor M. Watanabe gave us excellent suggestions. The authors would like to acknowledge his advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshio Yonezawa.

Additional information

Manuscript submitted March 17, 2013.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yonezawa, T., Suzuki, K., Ooki, S. et al. The Effect of Chemical Composition and Heat Treatment Conditions on Stacking Fault Energy for Fe-Cr-Ni Austenitic Stainless Steel. Metall Mater Trans A 44, 5884–5896 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-013-1943-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-013-1943-0

Keywords

Navigation