Abstract
Sinter-hardenable steel powders eliminate the extra steps normally required for heat treating since they allow for direct quenching of components at the end of the sintering cycle with a forced convection cooling unit. The current article presents the results of the effect of the alloying method on the optimization of compressibility and sinter-hardenability of sinter-hardenable PM steels. Water-atomized steel powders were produced. Two successive designs of experiments were used to optimize the chemical composition with prealloyed (nickel, chromium, molybdenum, and manganese) and admixed elements (nickel, chromium, manganese, and copper). Static mechanical properties were also characterized. Results show that among all of the combinations of chemical elements and within the range of concentrations studied, the optimum sinter-hardenable powder had the following prealloyed chemistry: 1.5 wt pct Ni, 1 to 1.25 wt pct Mo, and 0.40 to 0.55 wt pct Cr.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Lutheran, Int. J. Powder Metall. 2010, 46, p. 25–28.
G.F. Bocchini, B. Rivolta, G. Silva, E. Poggio, M.R. Pinasco, M.G. Ienco, Powder Metall., 2004, vol. 47, pp. 343-51.
N. Giguère, C. Blais, Mat Sci Forum Vols. 706 (2012), pp. 2107-2111.
G.E.P. Box, W.G. Hunter, J.S. Hunter, Statistics for Experimenters, John Wiley & Sons, NY, 1978, pp. 307-344.
MPIF: Metal Powder Industries Federation Standard 3. Metal Powder Industries Federation: Princeton, NJ, 1998.
MPIF: Metal Powder Industries Federation Standard 4. Metal Powder Industries Federation: Princeton, NJ, 1998.
MPIF: Metal Powder Industries Federation Standard 45. Metal Powder Industries Federation: Princeton, NJ, 1998.
MPIF: Metal Powder Industries Federation Standard 15. Metal Powder Industries Federation: Princeton, NJ, 1998.
MPIF: Metal Powder Industries Federation Standard 10. Metal Powder Industries Federation: Princeton, NJ, 1998.
MPIF: Metal Powder Industries Federation Standard 41. Metal Powder Industries Federation: Princeton, NJ, 1998.
MPIF: Metal Powder Industries Federation Standard 42. Metal Powder Industries Federation: Princeton, NJ, 1998.
MPIF: Metal Powder Industries Federation Standard 44. Metal Powder Industries Federation: Princeton, NJ, 1998.
MPIF: Metal Powder Industries Federation Standard 43. Metal Powder Industries Federation: Princeton, NJ, 1998.
D.R. Gaskell, Introduction to Metallurgical Thermodynamics 2nd Ed., Hemisphere Publishing Corp., New York, 1981, p.247.
R.M. German, Powder Metallurgy & Particulate Materials Processing, Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton, 1994, pp. 194-96.
E. Klar, ASM Handbook Volume 7 : Powder Metallurgy,, 6th Edition, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1997, pp.311-20.
G. Krauss, Steels: Processing, Structure and Performance, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, 2005, pp. 297-325.
B. Tougas, C. Blais, F. Chagnon, S. Pelletier, Mater. Trans. A, 2013, 44, pp. 754–765.
B. Lindsley: Euro PM2007, Toulouse, France, 2007, pp. 6.
Technical Data, 2004. http://www.hoeganaes.com/Product%20Datasheets/DatasheetsJan2009/Ancorsteel737SH.pdf.
T. Haberberger, F.G. Hanejko, M.L. Marucci, and P. King: Properties and Applications of High Density Sinter-Hardening Materials, 2006. http://www.hoeganaes.com/TechPapersv2/124.pdf.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the Auto21-Network of Centers of Excellence, Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Manuscript submitted March 26, 2012.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giguère, N., Blais, C. On the Optimization of Compressibility and Hardenability of Sinter-Hardenable PM Steels. Metall Mater Trans A 44, 4774–4787 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-013-1826-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-013-1826-4