Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Microstructure-Fracture Behavior Relationships of Slot-Welded Rail Steels

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microstructural analyses of the parent pearlitic and bainitic rail steels were performed, and the results were compared with the microstructure of the welded pearlitic and bainitic steels. An increase in the ASTM grain size number of the heat-affected zone (HAZ) for both pearlitic and bainitic slot welds was observed. The microstructural features that were identified in the weldment of both slot-welded steels were very similar. This was expected since the same welding wire was used to weld both rail steels. The weld consisted of mainly ferrite and had similar grain size. The fusion zones of the welded pearlitic and bainitic rail steels were examined after flexural tests to determine if there were any cracks present due to improper or weak fusion. Examination of the entire fusion zone under high optical magnification revealed no cracks, indicating that a perfect fusion was achieved. The three-point flexural behavior of the parent pearlitic and bainitic steels was evaluated and compared with that of the slot-welded steels. It was found that that the welded pearlitic steel has superior fracture resistance properties when compared to the parent pearlitic steel. The average fracture resistance of the parent pearlitic steel was 79 MPa√m compared to 119 MPa√m for the welded pearlitic steel. The slot-welded bainitic steel, however, showed similar fracture resistance properties to the parent bainitic steel with average values of 121 and 128 MPa√m, respectively. The failure mechanism of the welded and parent pearlitic and bainitic steels was also identified. Microvoid coalescence was observed in both welded rail steel samples. This was manifested by dimpled features, which are associated with ductile failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H.A. Aglan, Z.Y. Liu, M.F. Hassan, and M. Fateh: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2004, vol. 151, pp. 268–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Aglan and M. Fateh: Int. J. Damage Mech., 2006, vol. 15, pp. 393–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Aglan, M. Hassan, Z. Liu, M. Bhuyan, and M. Fateh: J. Mater. Sci., 2004, vol. 39, pp. 4305–07.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Aglan and M. Fateh: J. Mech. Mater. Struct., 2007, vol. 2, pp. 335–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K.J. Swaley and D.D. Davis: Technol. Digest, TD96-026, 1996, pp. 1–4.

  6. K.J. Swaley and J. Kristan: Technol. Digest, TD98-012, 1998, pp. 1–4.

  7. R.S. Funderburk: Modern Steel Constr., 2000.

  8. J.H. Bae, J.Y. Yoo, K.S. Kim, C.M. Kim, and K.B. Kang: POSCO Techn. Rep., 2006, vol. 10, pp. 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.M. Kim, J.B. Lee, and J.Y. Yoo: Proc. 15th Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf., Seoul, Korea, 2005, pp. 158–62.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.M. Losz, S. Saboury, and T.M. McNutt: ISIJ Int., 1994, vol. 35, pp. 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Kirchgabner, E. Badisch, and F. Franek: Wear, 2008, vol. 265, pp. 772–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J.A. Disney: Weld. J., 2007, pp. 54–57.

  13. K. Yildizli, M. Eroglu, and M. Karamis: Surf. Coat. Technol., 2007, vol. 201, pp. 7166–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. A.A. Allie, H.A. Aglan, and M. Fateh: J. Mech. Mater. Struct., 2010, vol. 5, pp. 263–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Tawfik, P.J. Mutton, and W.K. Chiu: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2008, vol. 196, pp. 279–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Rajanna, H.K. Shivanand, and A. Deep: World Acad. Sci., Eng. Technol., 2009, vol. 60, pp. 558–62.

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Meade: The Lincoln Electric Company, Cleveland, OH, 1999, pp. 1–10.

  18. Z. Wen, G. Xiao, X. Xiao, X. Jin, and M. Zhu: Eng. Failure Anal., 2009, vol. 16 (4), pp. 1221–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. K. Swaley and J. Sun: Railw. Track Struct., 1999, vol. 95 (8), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. U. Zerbst, R. Lundén, K.O. Edel, and R.A. Smith: Eng. Fract. Mech., 2009, vol. 76 (17), pp. 2563–2601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D.Y. Jeong, Y.H. Tang, and O. Orringer: Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-98/07, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, Dec. 1998, pp. 1–39.

  22. O. Orringer, Y.H. Tang, J.E. Gordon, D.Y. Jeong, J.M. Morris, and A.B. Perlman: Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-88/13, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 1988, pp. 41–62.

  23. D.Y. Jeong, Y.H. Tang, and O. Orringer: Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 1997, vol. 28, pp. 109–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. P. Clayton and Y.H. Tang: Residual Stress in Rails: Field Experience and Test Results, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1992, pp. 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  25. T.A. Cruse: Paper presented at 19th Nat. Symp. on Fracture Mechanics, San Antonio, TX, 1988, pp. 260–77.

  26. D.Y. Jeong, Y.H. Tang, O. Orringer, and A.B. Perlman: Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-98/06, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, Dec. 1998, pp. 1–55.

  27. C.D. Liu, M.N. Bassim, and S. Lawrence: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1995, vol. 50, pp. 301–07.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. C.P. Lonsdale: Paper presented at Proc. AREMA 1999 Annual Conf., Altoona, PA, 1999, pp. 1–18.

  29. J. Bradel and T.A. Siewert: Weld. Innov., 1997, vol. XIV, pp. 2–6.

  30. J. Kristan: Railw. Track Struct., 2005, vol. 101 (2), pp. 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was sponsored by the Federal Railroad Administration. The authors also acknowledge Mr. Jeff Stringer for assisting in sample preparation of the pearlitic and bainitic rail steels.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Engineering, Architecture and Physical Sciences, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, 36088, USA

    Aldinton Allie (Postdoctoral Student) & Heshmat Aglan (Associate Dean)

  2. Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, DC, 20590, USA

    Mahmood Fateh (Program Manager/Track and Structures)

Authors
  1. Aldinton Allie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heshmat Aglan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mahmood Fateh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heshmat Aglan.

Additional information

Manuscript submitted October 14, 2010.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allie, A., Aglan, H. & Fateh, M. Microstructure-Fracture Behavior Relationships of Slot-Welded Rail Steels. Metall Mater Trans A 42, 2706–2715 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-0665-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-0665-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation