Skip to main content
Log in

Directional Solidification of Mg-Al Alloys and Microsegregation Study of Mg Alloys AZ31 and AM50: Part II. Comparison between AZ31 and AM50

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Directional solidification (DS) of magnesium alloys AZ31 and AM50 was carried out to investigate microstructures and microsegregation under controlled solidification conditions. The methodology used is based on a customized DS technique elaborated on in Part I of this work. Dendritic microstructures observed in longitudinal sections of the quenched mushy zone, X-ray maps of fully directionally solidified cross sections, and quantitative solute profiles reveal the impact of cooling rate and alloy type. The solute-solvent correlation discloses the opposite segregation behavior of manganese compared to both aluminum and zinc and provides an impartial basis for the advanced weighted-interval ranking sort (WIRS) sorting scheme of electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) data. Precipitates Al8Mn5 and γ-Mg17Al12, predicted by thermodynamic calculations, are identified in the microstructure. The effect of back-diffusion during solidification, most pronounced for the component zinc, was clearly observed for both alloys in comparison with dedicated Scheil-total calculations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Mirković and R. Schmid-Fetzer: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2009, vol. 40A, this issue, DOI 10.1007/s11661-009-9787-3.

  2. M.K. Kulekci: Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2007, online publishing.

  3. V.Y. Gertsman, L. Jian, S. Xu, J.P. Thomson, and M. Sahoo: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2005, vol. 36A, pp. 1989–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Pettersen and N. Ryum: Metall. Trans. A, 1989, vol. 20A, pp. 847–52.

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Pettersen, O. Lohne, and N. Ryum: Metall. Trans. A, 1990, vol. 21A, pp. 221–30.

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Mathisen: Doctoral Thesis, NTH, Trondheim, Norway, 1988, pp. 62–65.

  7. J.D. Hunt and S.-Z. Lu: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1996, vol. 27A, pp. 611–23.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Zhang, D. Ma, K.-S. Wu, H.-B. Cao, G.-P. Cao, S. Kou, Y.A. Chang, and X.-Y. Yan: Intermetallics, 2007, vol. 15 (10), pp. 1395–1400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. S.-C. Huang and M.E. Glicksman: Acta Metall., 1981, vol. 29, pp. 701–15 and 717–34.

  10. J. Lacaze, P. Benigni, and A. Howe: Adv. Eng. Mater., 2003, vol. 5 (1–2), pp. 37–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study is supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) in the Priority Programme “DFG-SPP 1168: InnoMagTec” under Grant No. Schm 588/27(29).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Schmid-Fetzer.

Additional information

Manuscript submitted July 14, 2008.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mirković, D., Schmid-Fetzer, R. Directional Solidification of Mg-Al Alloys and Microsegregation Study of Mg Alloys AZ31 and AM50: Part II. Comparison between AZ31 and AM50. Metall Mater Trans A 40, 974–981 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-009-9788-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-009-9788-2

Keywords

Navigation