Abstract
It is generally accepted that the solvent debinding rate of powder injection molded (PIM) parts can be improved when coarse powder is used due to the larger pore size present in the compact. However, little hard experimental evidence on this has been reported. In this study, the as-received gas-atomized stainless steel powder was classified into four different particle sizes. Little difference in the debinding rate was found among these four groups. Similar results were also obtained using classified fine carbonyl iron powder and coarse water atomized iron powders. The diameter of the pore channel that was developed in the compact, while increasing as the particle size increased for both iron and stainless steel powders, did not affect the debinding rate. A comparison between the sizes of the pores and diffusing molecules suggests that the pores are significantly large for the small diffusing molecules. The calculation of the diffusion path or torturosity also indicates that the particle size does not affect the diffusion length and thus not the debinding rate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R.M. German and A. Bose: Injection Molding of Metals and Ceramics, MPIF, Princeton NJ, 1997, pp. 175–86.
K.S. Hwang and Y.M. Hsieh: Metall. Trans. A, 1996, vol. 27A, pp. 245–53.
H.K. Lin and K.S. Hwang: Acta Mater., 1998, vol. 46, pp. 4303–09.
G.R. White and R.M. German: Advances in Powder Metallurgy Particle Materials, A. Lawley and A. Swanson, eds., MPIF, Princeton, NJ, 1993, vol. 5, pp. 121–32.
E.J. Westcot, C. Binet, and R.M. German: Powder Metall., 2003, vol. 46 (1), pp. 61–67.
G.J. Shu and K.S. Hwang: Mater. Trans. JIM, 2004, 45 (10), pp. 2999–3004.
S.T. Lin and R.M. German: Powder Metall. Int., 1989, vol. 21, pp. 19–24.
D.-S. Tsai and W.-W. Chen: Ceram. Int., 1995, vol. 21, pp. 257–64.
I. Nanjo, M. Achikita, and S. Matsuda: Proc. 1993 Powder Metallurgy World Congr., Y. Bando and K. Kosuge, eds., Japan Society of Powder and Powder Metallurgy, Kyoto, Japan, 1993, part 1, pp. 241–44.
R.M. German: Int. J. Powder Metall., 1987, vol. 23, pp. 237–45.
S. Krug, J.R.G. Evans, and J.H.H. ter Maat: AIChE J., 2002, vol. 48, pp. 1533–41.
B.A. Meyer and D.W. Smith: Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund., 1985, vol. 24, pp. 360–68.
R.M. German: Powder Injection Molding, MPIF, Princeton, NJ, 1990, pp. 286–91.
S. Ergun: Chem. Eng. Progr., 1952, vol. 48, pp. 89–94.
K.S. Hwang, H.K. Lin, and S.C. Lee: Mater. Manufacturing Processes, 1997, vol. 12 (4), pp. 593–608.
S.C. Hu and K.S. Hwang: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2000, vol. 31A, pp. 1473–78.
S.T. Lin and R.M. German: Powder Metall. Int., 1989, vol. 21, pp. 19–24.
J.F. Shackelford: Introduction to Materials Science for Engineers, 6th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2005, pp. 471–75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hwang, K.S., Shu, G.J. & Lee, H.J. Solvent debinding behavior of powder injection molded components prepared from powders with different particle sizes. Metall Mater Trans A 36, 161–167 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-005-0148-6
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-005-0148-6