Skip to main content
Log in

Scatter in fatigue life due to effects of porosity in cast A356-T6 aluminum-silicon alloys

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Porosity is well known to be a potent initiator of fatigue cracks in cast aluminum alloys. This article addresses the observed scatter in fatigue life of a cast A356-T6 aluminum-silicon alloy due to the presence of porosity. Specimens containing a controlled amount of porosity were prepared by employing a wedge-shaped casting mold and adjusting the degassing process during casting. High-cycle fatigue tests were conducted under fixed stress conditions on a series of specimens with controlled microstructures (especially, the secondary dendrite-arm spacing), and the degree of scatter in the results was assessed. Stochastically, such scatter was found to be adequately characterized by a three-parameter Weibull distribution function. Large pores at or close to the specimen surface were found to be responsible for crack initiation in all fatigue-test specimens, and the resultant fatigue life was related to the initiating pore size through a relationship based on the rate of small-fatigue-crack propagation. With respect to the probabilities for the pores of various sizes and locations to initiate a fatigue crack, a statistical model was developed to establish the relationship between the porosity population and the resultant scatter in fatigue life. The modeling predictions are in agreement with the experimental results. Moreover, Monte-Carlo simulation based on this model demonstrated that the average pore size, pore density, and standard deviation of the pore sizes, together with the specimen size and geometry, are all of consequence regarding scatter in fatigue life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I.J. Polmear: Light Alloys—Metallurgy of the Light Metals, 2nd ed., Edward Arnold, London, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Shivkumar, L. Wang, and C. Keller: AFS Trans., 1995, vol. 103, pp. 705–09.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Q.G. Wang, D. Apelian, and D.A. Lados: J. Light Met., 2001, vol. 1, pp. 73–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Nyahumwa, N.R. Green, and J. Campbell: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2001, vol. 32A, pp. 349–58.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M.J. Couper, A.E. Nesson and J.R. Griffiths: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1990, vol. 13, pp. 213–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Skallerud, T. Iveland, and G. Harkegard: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1993, vol. 44, pp. 857–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.-Y. Buffiere, S. Savelli, P.H. Jouneau, E. Maire and R. Fougeres: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2001, vol. A316, pp. 115–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. M.J. Caton, J.W. Jones, and J.E. Allison: Fatigue Crack Growth Thresholds, Endurance Limits, and Design, ASTM STP 1732, J.C.J. Newman and R.S. Piascik, ASTM, Wext Conshohocken, PA, 2000, pp. 285–303.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.M. Boileau: Ph.D Thesis, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.C. Ting, V. Frederick, and F.V. Lawrence: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1993, vol. 16, pp. 631–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Savelli, J.-Y. Buffiere, and R. Fougeres: Mater. Sci. Forum, 2000, vols. 331–337, pp. 197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Shiozawa, Y. Tohda, and S.-M. Sun: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1997, vol. 20, pp. 237–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Q.G. Wang, D. Apelian, and D.A. Lados: J. Light Met., 2001, vol. 1, pp. 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P.J. Laz and B.M. Hillberry: Int. J. Fatigue, 1998, vol. 20, pp. 263–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. W. Mendenhall and T. Sincich: Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, 4th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2000, pp. 111–60.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E.E. Underwood: Quantitative Stereology, Addison-Wesley, London, 1970, pp. 109–45.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K.J. Kurzydlowski and B. Ralph: The Quantitative Description of the Microstructure of Materials, CRC Press Inc., London, 1995, pp. 83–85.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.L. Fullman: Trans. AIME, 1953, vol. 197, pp. 447–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J.E. Spowart, B. Maruyama, and D.B. Miracle: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2001, vol. A307, pp. 51–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M.H. El Haddad, T.H. Topper, and K.N. Smith: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1979, vol. 11, pp. 573–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. R.W. Hertzberg: Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1996, pp. 622.

    Google Scholar 

  22. K. Gall, M.F. Horstemeyer, B.W. Degner, D. McDowell, and J.H. Fan: Int. J. Fract., 2001, vol. 108, pp. 207–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Murakami: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1985, vol. 22, pp. 101–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A.D. Bussac and J.C. Lautridou: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1993, vol. 16, pp. 861–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M.T. Todinov: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1998, vol. A255, pp. 117–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. A.P. Bazant: J. Eng. Mech., 1984, vol. 110, pp. 518–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Makkonen: Int. J. Fatigue, 2001, vol. 23, pp. 395–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yi, J.Z., Gao, Y.X., Lee, P.D. et al. Scatter in fatigue life due to effects of porosity in cast A356-T6 aluminum-silicon alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 34, 1879–1890 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-003-0153-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-003-0153-6

Keywords

Navigation