Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the Cu-3 Wt pct Ti cellular interphase boundary by various models

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cellular-interlamellar interface in Cu-3 wt pct Ti is modeled employing three different theoretical approaches, which are then compared to experimental observations obtained by transmission electron strain contrast and high-resolution microscopy. The simplest modeling technique used is interfacial superposition, which is shown to give useful information on the general nature of the interface. Van der Merwe’s ideal interfacial-configuration model, which calculates the relative energies of different misorientations and dilatations, establishes three nearby energy minima over azimuthal rotations of less than 1 deg for a given interlamellar habit plane. This is too small a rotation to differentiate by experiment alone. From this ideal interfacial-configuration model, a different orientation relationship than previously reported in the literature is proposed that more closely represents the experimental observations when combined with O-lattice calculations, viz., (111) α ‖ (010) β with [-101] α ‖ [501] β , where α is the fcc matrix, and β is the Cu4Ti orthorhombic phase. Probable defect networks were determined by the O-lattice method for the new and previously proposed orientation relationships (ORs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.C. Ecob, J.V. Bee, and B. Ralph: J. Microsc., 1979, vol. 116, p. 141.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. R.C. Ecob, J.V. Bee, and B. Ralph: Metall. Trans. A, 1980, vol. 11A, p. 1407.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. R.W. Fonda and G.J. Shiflet: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2002, vol. 33A, pp. 2507–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H.U. Pfeiffer, S. Bhan, and K. Schubert: J. Less-Common Met., 1968, vol. 14, p. 291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J.P. Zhang, H.Q. Ye, K.H. Kuo, and S. Amelinckx: Phys. Status Solidi, 1985, vol. 88a, p. 475.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.W. Fonda and G.J. Shiflet: Ultramicroscopy, 1989, vol. 30, pp. 161–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. W. Bollman: J. Phys., 1982, vol. 43 (C6), p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Bollman: Crystal Defects and Crystalline Interfaces, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.H. van der Merwe: Phil. Mag., 1982, vol. 45A, p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Bollman: Phil. Mag., 1967, vol. 16, p. 363.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C.M. Wayman: Introduction to the Crystallagraphy of Martensite Transformations, Macmillan Co., New York, NY, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  12. U. Dahmen: Scripta Metall., 1981, vol. 15, p. 77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. U. Dahmen: Acta Metall., 1982, vol. 30, p. 63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. U. Dahmen, P. Ferguson, and K.H. Westmacott: Acta Metall., 1984, vol. 32, p. 803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. D.S. Zhou, R.W. Fonda, and G.J. Shiflet: Scripta Metall., 1991, vol. 25, pp. 2639–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Beatty, S.A. Hackney, and G.J. Shiflet: Phil. Mag., 1988, vol. 57A, pp. 457–66.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Black: MS Thesis, Univ. of Virginia, 1987.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is based on a presentation in the symposium “Interfacial Dislocations: Symposium in Honor of J.H. van der Merwe on the 50th Anniversary of His Discovery,” as part of the 2000 TMS Fall Meeting, October 11–12, 2000, in St. Louis, Missouri, sponsored under the auspices of ASM International, Materials Science Critical Technology, Sector, Structures.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fonda, R.W., Shiflet, G.J. Analysis of the Cu-3 Wt pct Ti cellular interphase boundary by various models. Metall Mater Trans A 33, 2495–2505 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-002-0371-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-002-0371-3

Keywords

Navigation