Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fatigue-crack growth in Ti-6Al-4V-0.1Ru in air and seawater: Part II. crack path and microstructure

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Part I of this article, the influence of various testing parameters and environments on the fatigue-crack growth rates in samples of beta-annealed Ti-6Al-4V-0.1Ru (extra-low interstitials) ELI was reported.[1] A design-of-experiments (DOE) approach was used to survey different combinations of variables, all expected to be important for dynamically loaded offshore oil and gas production risers, and to identify significant effects on the fatigue-crack propagation rate at a stress-intensity range of ΔK=17 MPa\(\sqrt m \). The da/dN vs ΔK curves also were examined for the DOE and supplementary tests, and the results of the two approaches were compared. In this part of the study, the microstructural basis for the robust fatigue-crack growth resistance of beta-annealed Ti-6Al-4V-0.1Ru (ELI) samples was investigated with optical metallography and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A gradual transition from structure-sensitive (microfacet formation) to structure-insensitive (striation formation) crack propagation centered at ΔK trans ≅24 MPa\(\sqrt m \), regardless of the combination of testing/environmental conditions examined; the absence of a sharp transition in the slope of the da/dN vs ΔK curves was, therefore, entirely consistent with the fracture-surface morphology. The size of the reversed cyclic plastic zone at the transition ΔK value correlated with the size of the lamella packets, but the number of cycles required to generate a striation ranged between one and ten, suggesting that the crack actively grew over only a portion of its front at any one instant. It is interesting to note that ΔK trans was the same as the stress range where the da/dN curves at 0.2, 2, and 20 Hz (in seawater) converged to a single curve (refer to Part I of this article): at lower stress ranges, crack growth rates at 20 Hz were significantly higher than those at 0.2 and 2 Hz. The quantitative data showed that fatigue cracks propagated parallel to lamellae interfaces when the long axes of the lamellae made a relatively small angle (<30 deg) to the nominal crack-propagation direction. The crack cut directly across lamellae (i.e., perpendicular to their surfaces) when the long axes of the lamellae were nearly perpendicular to the nominal crack-propagation direction. If the lamellae long axes lay 45 deg to the crack-propagation direction, the crack deflected to run parallel or perpendicular to the lamellae. This behavior occurred regardless of the environment and loading conditions investigated. There was considerable variation in the amount that the cracks deviated from their nominal plane (i.e., the plane normal to the load axis and through the notch tip), with much greater deflections in the cold-rolled than in the parent material, but the angle of the macroscopic crack plane did not exceed 11 deg. Crack branching was observed both at the center and outer surfaces of the samples, regardless of ΔK or other parameters. The relationship between micro- and macrobranches was examined, and branching was more prominent below ΔK trans, which separated the structure-sensitive and continuum-mode crack-propagation regimes. The relative amounts of micro- and microbranches are reported, and this branching may explain the large scatter in the measurements of the fatigue-crack growth rate often encountered in Ti-6Al-4V and its variants and points to the need for thorough characterization of crack paths, both midplane and surface, as part of the interpretation of da/dN vs ΔK data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.A. Langøy and S.R. Stock: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2001, vol. 32A, pp. 2297–2314.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.C. Chesnutt, J.C. Williams, and A.W. Thompson: in Fatigue 84, C.J. Beevers, ed., Engineering Advisory Service, Warley, United Kingdom, 1984, pp. 341–50.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.E. Irving and C.J. Beevers: Metall. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 391–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. P.E. Irving and C.J. Beevers: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1974, vol. 14, pp. 229–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Yuen, S.W. Hopkins, G.R. Leverant, and C.A. Rau: Metall. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 1833–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Thomson: Atta Acad. Siena, 1804, vol. 9, pp. 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K.A. Neumann: documenting work of A. von Widmanstätten: Ann. Phys., 1812, vol. 42, pp. 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T.L. Anderson: Fracture Mechanics, 2nd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1995, pp. 513–58.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.J.H. Wanhill, R. Galatolo, and C.E.W. Looije: Int. J. Fatigue, 1989, vol. 11 (6), pp. 407–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. G.R. Yoder, L.A. Cooley, and T.W. Crooker: Metall. Trans. A, 1977, vol. 8A, pp. 1737–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. K.S. Ravichandran: Acta Metall. Mater., 1991, vol. 39, pp. 401–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. R.O. Ritchie and S. Suresh: Metall. Trans. A, 1982, vol. 13A, pp. 937–40.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Lindigkeit, G. Terlinde, A. Gysler, and G. Lütjering: Acta Metall., 1979, vol. 27, pp. 1717–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. R.J. Bucci: Ph.D. Thesis, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 1970; cited by S. Suresh: Fatigue of Materials, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1991, p. 379.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.E. Allison and J.C. Williams: in Strength of Metals and Alloys (ICSMA 6), R.C. Gifkins, ed., Pergamon Press, New York, 1983, vol. 3, pp. 1219–24.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Peters, A. Gysler, and G. Lütjering: Metall. Trans. A, 1984, vol. 15A, pp. 1597–1605.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. D.B. Dawson and R.M. Pelloux: Metall. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 723–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Chiou and R.P. Wei: Report No. NADC-83126-60-Vol. V, Naval Air Development Center, Warminster, PA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P.J. Bania and D. Eylon: Metall. Trans. A, 1978, vol. 9A, pp. 847–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Gao, P.S. Pao, and R.P. Wei: Metall. Trans. A, 1988, vol. 19A, pp. 1739–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. U. Muralidharan and R. Furquen: in Advances in Mechanical Behavior and Properties, A. Saigal and A.A. Tseng, eds., ASME, Fairfield, NJ, 1988, pp. 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Gnanamoorthy, Y. Mutoh, K. Hayashi, and Y. Mizuhara: Scripta Metall. Mater., 1995, vol. 33, pp. 907–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. W.O. Soboyejo: Metall. Trans. A, 1992, vol. 23A, pp. 1737–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Suresh: Metall. Trans. A, 1985, vol. 16A, pp. 249–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. K.T. Venkateswara Rao, W. Yu, and R.O. Ritchie: Metall. Trans. A, 1988, vol. 19A, pp. 549–61.

    Google Scholar 

  26. B. Cotterell and J.R. Rice: Int. J. Fract., 1980, vol. 16, pp. 155–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. L.R.F. Rose: Int. J. Fracture, 1986, vol. 31, pp. 233–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. R.O. Ritchie: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1988, vol. A103, pp. 15–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. K.S. Ravichandran and E.S. Dwarakadasa: Scripta Metall., 1989, vol. 23, pp. 1685–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. R.K. Steele and A.J. McEvily: Eng. Fracture Mech., 1976, vol. 8, pp. 31–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. V.K. Saxena and V.M. Radhakrishnan: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1998, vol. 29A, pp. 245–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. R.J.H. Wanhill: Br. Corr. J., 1975, vol. 10 (2), pp. 69–78.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. D.N. Fager and W.F. Spurr: Trans. ASM, 1968, vol. 61, pp. 283–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. H.J. Roven, M.A. Langøy, and E. Nes: in Fatigue-87, R.O. Ritchie and E.A. Starke, eds., Engineering Advisory Services, Warley, United Kingdom, 1987, vol. 1, pp. 175–84.

    Google Scholar 

  35. T.M. Breunig, S.R. Stock, S.D. Antolovich, J.H. Kinney, W.N. Massey, and M.C. Nichols: in Fracture Mechanics: Twenty-Second Symposium, ASTM STP 1131, H.A. Ernst, A. Saxena, and D.L. McDowell, eds., ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1992, vol. 1, pp. 749–61.

    Google Scholar 

  36. T.M. Breunig, S.R. Stock, and R.C. Brown: Mater. Eval., 1993, vol. 51, pp. 596–600.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. A. Guvenilir, S.R. Stock, M.D. Barker, and R.A. Betz: in Aluminum Alloys: Their Physical Properties and Mechanical Properties, Vol. II, T.H. Sanders and E.A. Starke, eds., Georgia Inst. of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 1994, vol. II, pp. 413–19.

    Google Scholar 

  38. A. Guvenilir, T.M. Breunig, J.H. Kinney, and S.R. Stock: Acta Mater., 1997, vol. 45, pp. 1977–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. A. Guvenilir and S.R. Stock: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1998, vol. 21, pp. 439–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. A. Guvenilir, T.M. Breunig, J.H. Kinney, and S.R. Stock: Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (London), 1999, vol. 357, pp. 2755–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. S.R. Stock: Int. Mater. Rev., 1999, vol. 44, pp. 141–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stock, S.R., Langøy, M.A. Fatigue-crack growth in Ti-6Al-4V-0.1Ru in air and seawater: Part II. crack path and microstructure. Metall Mater Trans A 32, 2315–2324 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-001-0205-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-001-0205-8

Keywords

Navigation