Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fatigue-crack growth in Ti-6Al-4V-0.1Ru in air and seawater: Part I. Design of experiments, assessment, and crack-grown-rate curves

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fatigue-crack growth rates for different simulated ocean environments and loading conditions have been investigated for beta-annealed Ti-6Al-4V-0.1Ru (extra-low interstitials, (ELI)), a candidate material for oil production risers; the focus was on uncovering whether certain combinations of conditions could produce unexpectedly high crack growth rates. A two-level, one-quarter-fraction factorial design-of-experiments (DOE) approach was used to ascertain which testing variables and environmental conditions warranted further study. This study used eight different combinations of variables: parent/deformed material, 27 °C/85 °C temperature, 2 Hz/20 Hz loading frequency, 0.1/0.6 load ratio (R=σ min/σ max, where σ min is the minimum and σ max is the maximum stress during a fatigue cycle), and aerated/deaerated seawater. Comparisons were based on crack growth rates at ΔK=17 MPa\(\sqrt m \), roughly the middle of the Paris portion of the da/dN vs ΔK curves. The da/dN vs ΔK curves were also examined, and conclusions based upon these data were compared with those from the DOE. Consideration of the microstructure’s influence on the crack path is postponed until Part II of this article. Samples tested at the higher load ratio showed a statistically significant increase in the crack propagation rate compared to those tested at R=0.1; the same was true of specimens tested at 20 Hz vs those tested at 2 Hz, but the level of significance was lower. The parent material had somewhat higher crack growth rates than the deformed samples. Changes in environmental conditions other than frequency produced little effect on the crack growth rate. Comparison of crack growth rates over the ΔK range measured revealed details that would have not been uncovered in comparisons at a single ΔK value. The Paris exponent ranged between 3.7 and 6.7, and the only systematic variation observed was an increase in the exponent with increasing test frequency. In seawater, cold work (a 5 pct reduction in thickness by rolling) reduced fatigue-crack growth rates by a factor of 2 (compared to the parent material) at intermediate and high ΔK values. There was a crossover of crack growth rates for low ΔK values: below 10 MPa\(\sqrt m \), growth rates were lower for the parent material than for the cold-rolled material, suggesting a higher ΔK th for the parent material, while above this value, fatigue cracks grew more rapidly in the parent material than in the cold-rolled material. Crack growth rates were slightly higher in seawater than in air, but only slightly more than the sample-to-sample variation of crack growth rates, and cold work reduced fatigue-crack growth rates in air by about the same amount as in seawater. Somewhat more scatter was observed for the R=0.1 tests than for the R=0.6 tests. Differences in temperature (27 °C, 53 °C, and 85 °C) do not appear to affect fatigue-crack growth rates. For ΔK<20 MPa\(\sqrt m \), crack growth rates were similar for 0.2 and 2 Hz but were higher for 20 Hz; above 20 MPa\(\sqrt m \), the crack growth rates were similar for all three frequencies.

One explanation for the unusual frequency dependence relies on the possibility that the environment produces different amounts of closure for different test frequencies. According to this view, closure is effective in air and in seawater at 0.2 and 2 Hz but not at 20 Hz: perhaps the higher loading rate breeches the passive layer at a rate more rapid than it can reform. Because the crack growth rate appeared independent of temperature, it is unlikely that there is a significant influence of thermally activated corrosion-fatigue mechanisms for the conditions tested.

The results demonstrate that beta-annealed Ti-6V-4Al-0.1Ru (ELI) possesses a robust response to the combinations of environment and loading expected in oil production riser service. The value of the DOE approach was clear, and supplementary tests verified the main effects predicted by the DOE results. Comparison of the single-value DOE results with the da/dN curves reveals a limitation in the former: different slopes of the Paris curves and crossover effects are or would be missed for DOE comparing crack growth rates derived from constant ΔK tests. The use of constant Δσ data and a second level of interrogation, following DOE analysis and based on the da/dN curves, addressed this limitation effectively. A DOE comparison based, for example, on three ΔK values (the lower, middle, and upper portions of the Paris regime) might be another way of proceeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Thørstad, H. Bratfos, G. Eriksen, and O.J. Hauge: Proc. Titanium Risers and Flowlines Seminar, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Berge and A.R. Ziegler: in Non-Aerospace Applications of Titanium, F.H. Froes, P.G. Allen, and M. Niinomi, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1998, pp. 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G.E.P. Box, W.G. Hunter, and J.S. Hunter: in Statistics for Experimenters, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, 1978, pp. 306–51.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.G. Saathoff and P.K. Mallick: Advancements in Fatigue Research and Applications, SAE SP-1341, SAE, Warrendale, PA, 1989, pp. 77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Spuzic, M. Zec, K. Abhary, R. Ghomanshchi, and I. Reid: Wear, 1997, vol. 212, pp. 131–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. K.D. Christian, R.M. German, and A.S. Paulson: Proc. 1988 Int. Powder Metallurgy Conf., American Powder Metallurgy Institute, Princeton, NJ, 1988, pp. 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M.I. Mendelson: Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., 1998, vol. 19, pp. 579–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. D.B. Dawson and R.M. Pelloux: Metall. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 723–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Gulbrandsen and A. Engseth: Deep Water, Institute for International Research, London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Berge, S. Saevik, A.G. Engseth, and R. Aarnes: Proc. 14th, Int. Conf. Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Mamdouh Salama, ed., ASME, Fairfield, NJ, 1995, Part 3, pp. 391–99.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C.F. Baxter and R.W. Schutz: Proc. 15th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME, Fairfield, NJ, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Takagawa, H. Yamamoto, and S. Ishida: in Proc. 14th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME, Fairfield, NJ, 1995, pp. 281–87.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Charles, J.P. Doucet, R. Boulisset, J. Sugier, J. Guesnon, and G. Chanlon: Corrosion ’86, NACE, 1986, paper no. 219.

  14. S.F. Foer: Cand Scient Thesis, University of Bergen, Norway, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Skauge: in Non-Aerospace Applications of Titanium, F.H. Froes, P.G. Allen, and M. Niinomi, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1998, pp. 165–72.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. Lunde and H.B. Norvik: in Non-Aerospace Applications of Titanium, F.H. Froes, P.G. Allen, and M. Niinomi, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1998, pp. 172–80.

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. Torster, J.F. dos Santos, G. Hutt, and M. Kocak: in Non-Aerospace Applications of Titanium, F.H. Froes, P.G. Allen, and M. Niinomi, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1998, pp. 181–88.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Baxter, S. Pillai, and G. Hutt: Proc. 29th Annual Offshore Technology Conf., 1997, vol. 2, p. 8409.

    Google Scholar 

  19. F.W. Grealish and M. O’Sullivan: Proc. Titanium Risers and Flowlines Seminar, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.W. Schutz: Platinum Met. Rev., 1996, vol. 40, pp. 54–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. E. Van der Lingen and H. De Villiers Steyn: Titanium Development Assoc., 1994, pp. 450–61.

  22. A. Saxena: Nonlinear Fracture Mechanics for Engineers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  23. “Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates,” E 647-95a, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1996, pp. 565–601.

  24. R.J. Bucci, P.C. Paris, R.W. Hertzberg, R.A. Schmidt, and A.F. Anderson: Stress Analysis and Growth of Cracks, ASTM STP 513, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1972, pp. 125–40.

    Google Scholar 

  25. T.T. Shih and R.P. Wei: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1974, vol. 6, pp. 19–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Yuen, S.W. Hopkins, G.R. Leverant, and C.A. Rau: Metall. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 1833–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. R.L. Tobler: Cracks and Fracture, ASTM STP 601, J.L. Swedlow and M.L. Williams, eds., ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1976, pp. 346–70.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J.C. Chesnutt, A.W. Thompson, and J.C. Williams: “Influence of Metallurgical Factors on the Fatigue Crack Growth Rate in Alpha-Beta Titanium Alloys,”, Report No. AFML-TR-78-68, Rockwell International Science Center, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J.C. Chesnutt and J.A. Wert: in Fatigue Crack Growth Threshold Concepts, D.L. Davidson and S. Suresh, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1983, pp. 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  30. P.E. Irving and C.J. Beevers: Metall. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 391–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. J. Ødegård, C. Thaulow, K.O. Halsen, and M. Bårde: Proc. 17th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME, Fairfield, NJ, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  32. L. Wagner: ASM Handbook, Fatigue and Fracture, 1996, vol. 19, pp. 837–45.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R.P. Wei and G. Shim: in Corrosion Fatigue, ASTM STP 801, T.W. Crooker and B.N. Leis, eds., ASTM, 1983, pp. 5–25.

  34. D.A. Jones: Principles and Prevention of Corrosion, Prentice-Hall, 1996, pp. 235–90.

  35. T.W. Crooker and E.A. Lange: Naval Research Laboratory Report No. 6944, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  36. W.J. Evans, M.R. Bache, M. McElhone, and L. Grabowski: Int. J. Fatigue, 1997, vol. 19, pp. S177-S182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. S. Chiou and R.P. Wei: Report No. NADC-83126-60-Vol. V, Naval Air Development Center, Warminster, PA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  38. G.F. Pittianto: Metall. Trans., 1972, vol. 3, pp. 235–43.

    Google Scholar 

  39. H. Döker and G. Marci: Int. J. Fatigue, 1983, vol. 5, pp. 187–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. P.E. Irving and C.J. Beevers: Metall. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 391–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. T.T. Shih and R.P. Wei: in Prospects of Fracture Mechanics, G.C. Sih, H.C. Van Elst, and B. Broek, eds., Nordhoff International Pub., 1974, pp. 2321-50.

  42. R.J.H. Wanhill: Metall. Trans. A, 1976, vol. 2A, pp. 1365–73.

    Google Scholar 

  43. M. Peters, A. Gysler, and G. Luetjering: in Titanium ’80, H. Kimura and O. Izumi, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1980, pp. 1777–86.

    Google Scholar 

  44. J.K. Gregory and H.-G. Brokmeier: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1995, vol. A203, pp. 365–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. J.T. Ryder, W.E. Krupp, D.E. Pettit, and D.W. Hoeppner: in Corrosion Fatigue Technology, ASTM STP 642, H.L. Craig, Jr., T.W. Crooker, and D.W. Hoeppner, eds., ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1978, pp. 202–22.

    Google Scholar 

  46. G.R. Yoder, L.A. Cooley, and T.W. Crooker: in Corrosion Fatigue, ASTM STP, 801, T.W. Crooker and B.N. Leis, eds., ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1983, pp. 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  47. J. Charles, J.P. Doucet, and R. Boulisset: Corrosion ’86, NACE, Houston, TX, 1986, paper no. 219.

  48. D.E. Gordon, S.D. Manning, and R.P. Wei: in Corrosion Cracking, V.S. Goel, ed., ASM International, Metals Park, OH, 1985, pp. 157–65.

    Google Scholar 

  49. R. Ebara, Y. Yamada, and A. Goto: in Corrosion Fatigue, ASTM STP 801, T.W. Crooker and B.N. Leis, eds., ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1983, pp. 135–46.

    Google Scholar 

  50. S.W. Smith and R.S. Piascik: in Fatigue Behavior of Titanium Alloys, R. Boyer, D. Eylon, and G. Lütjering, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1988, pp. 357–64.

    Google Scholar 

  51. R.J. Bucci: Ph.D. Thesis, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 1970; cited in Fatigue of Materials, S. Suresh, ed., Cambridge University Press, 1991, p. 379.

  52. L.R. Hall, R.W. Finger, and W.F. Spurr: Report No. AFML-TR-73-204, Boeing Aerospace Company, Seattle, WA, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  53. J.A. Bannantine, J.J. Comer, and J.L. Handrock: Fundamentals of Metal Fatigue Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1990, pp. 88–123.

    Google Scholar 

  54. H. Ouchi, J. Kobayashi, and I. Soya: in Environment Assisted Fatigue, EGF7, P. Scott, ed., Mechanical Engineering Publications, London, 1990, pp. 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  55. J. Kerr, R. Holms, and G.M. Brown: in Environment Assisted Fatigue, EGF7, P. Scott, ed., Mechanical Engineering Publications, London, 1990, pp. 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  56. NACE International Work Group T-11-4f (John Olson III, Chairman): NACE International Publication 11100, NACE, Houston, TX, Mar. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  57. “Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Metallic Materials,” E 8–98, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1998.

  58. J.R. Schley: RMI Titanium, supplier information and private communication, Niles, OH, 1998.

  59. “Standard Test Method for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials,” E 399–90, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1990, p. 508.

  60. C.L. Muhlstein: Master’s Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  61. A. Saxena and S.J. Hudak: Int. J. Fracture, 1978, vol. 14, 453–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. “Standard Specification for Substitute Ocean Water,” D 1141–90, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1990, pp. 2299–2300.

  63. “Minitab®,” Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995.

  64. R.R. Ferguson and R.C. Berryman: Report No. AFML-TR-76-137, Rockwell International, Los Angeles, CA, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  65. R.R. Boyer, R. Bajoraitis, and W.F. Spurr: in Microstructure Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Crack Growth Rate in Titanium Alloys, A.K. Chakrabarti and J.C. Chesnutt, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1987, pp. 149–70.

    Google Scholar 

  66. D.E. Piper, S.H. Smith, and R.V. Carter: Met. Eng. Q., 1968, pp. 50–63.

  67. G.R. Yoder, L.A. Cooley, and T.W. Crooker: Metall. Trans. A, 1977, vol. 8A, pp. 1737–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. A.J. Thompson, J.C. Williams, J.D. Frandsen, and J.D. Chesnutt: in Titanium, J.C. Williams and A.F. Belov, eds., Plenum, New York, 1976, pp. 691–704.

    Google Scholar 

  69. M.D. Halliday and C.J. Beevers: Int. J. Fracture, 1979, vol. 15, pp. R27-R30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. P.J. Bania and D. Eylon: Metall. Trans. A, 1978, vol. 9A, pp. 847–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. K.S. Ravaichandrin: Acta Metall. Mater., 1991, vol. 39, pp. 401–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. V.K. Saxena and V.M. Radhakrishnan: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1998, vol. 29A, pp. 245–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. C.G. Rhodes, J.C. Chesnutt, and J.A. Wert: in Microstructure Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Crack Growth Rate in Titanium Alloys, A.K. Chakrabarti and J.C. Chesnutt, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1987, pp. 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  74. D. Eylon and C.M. Pierce: Metall. Trans. A, 1976, vol. 7A, pp. 111–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. [Deleted in proof].

  76. G. Mankowski, J.A. Petit, and F. Dabosi: in Titanium ’80, H. Kimura and O. Izumi, eds., 1980, pp. 2605–12.

  77. R.P. Wei: in Fatigue Mechanisms, ASTM STP, 675, J.T. Fong, ed., ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1979, pp. 816–31.

    Google Scholar 

  78. F.P. Ford and P.L. Andresen: in Advances in Fracture Research. U.M. Salema, K. Ravi-Chandar, D.M.R. Taplin, and R. Ramo, eds., Pergamon, New York, 1989, pp. 1571–83.

    Google Scholar 

  79. R.O. Ritchie: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1988, vol. A103, pp. 15–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. A.K. Vaseudeven, K. Sadananda, and N. Louat: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1994, vol. A188, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  81. W. Elber: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1970, vol. 2, pp. 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. R.O. Ritchie and S. Suresh: Metall. Trans. A, 1982, vol. 13A, pp. 937–40.

    Google Scholar 

  83. R.H. Christensen: Appl. Mater. Res., 1963, pp. 207–10.

  84. H.R. Mayer, S.E. Stanzl-Tschegg, Y. Sawaki, M. Hühner, and E. Hornbogen: Fat. Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1995, vol. 18, pp. 935–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. J.-L. Tzou, C.H. Hsueh, A.G. Evans, and R.O. Ritchie: Acta Metall., 1985, vol. 33, pp. 117–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. A. Guvenilir, T.M. Breunig, J.H. Kinney, and S.R. Stock: Acta Mater., 1997, vol. 45, pp. 1977–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. A. Guvenilir and S.R. Stock: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1998, vol. 21, pp. 439–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. A. Guvenilir, T.M. Breunig, J.H. Kinney, and S.R. Stock: Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (London), 1999, vol. 357, pp. 2755–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. R. Morano, S.R. Stock, G.R. Davis, and J.C. Elliott: Nondestructive Methods for Materials Characterization, Materials Research Society Symposia Proceedings, Materials Research Society, Philadelphia, PA, 2000, vol. 591, pp. 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stock, S.R., Langøy, M.A. Fatigue-crack growth in Ti-6Al-4V-0.1Ru in air and seawater: Part I. Design of experiments, assessment, and crack-grown-rate curves. Metall Mater Trans A 32, 2297–2314 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-001-0204-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-001-0204-9

Keywords

Navigation